Bethany J. Macdonald, Tilman M. Davies, Martin L. Hazelton
{"title":"蒙特卡罗极大似然拟合空间对数-高斯Cox过程的可行性","authors":"Bethany J. Macdonald, Tilman M. Davies, Martin L. Hazelton","doi":"10.1016/j.spasta.2023.100759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Log-Gaussian Cox processes (LGCPs) are a popular and flexible tool for modelling point pattern data. While maximum likelihood estimation<span> of the parameters of such a model is attractive in principle, the likelihood function is not available in closed form. Various Monte Carlo approximations have been proposed, but these have seen very limited use in the literature and are often dismissed as impractical. This article provides a comprehensive study of the computational properties of Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation (MCMLE) for LGCPs. We compare various importance sampling algorithms for MCMLE, and also consider their performance against other methods of inference (such as minimum contrast) in numerical studies. We find that the best MCMLE algorithm is a practical </span></span>proposition for parameter estimation given modern computing power, but the performance of this methodology is rather sensitive to the choice of reference parameters defining the importance sampling distribution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Monte-Carlo maximum likelihood for fitting spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes\",\"authors\":\"Bethany J. Macdonald, Tilman M. Davies, Martin L. Hazelton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spasta.2023.100759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Log-Gaussian Cox processes (LGCPs) are a popular and flexible tool for modelling point pattern data. While maximum likelihood estimation<span> of the parameters of such a model is attractive in principle, the likelihood function is not available in closed form. Various Monte Carlo approximations have been proposed, but these have seen very limited use in the literature and are often dismissed as impractical. This article provides a comprehensive study of the computational properties of Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation (MCMLE) for LGCPs. We compare various importance sampling algorithms for MCMLE, and also consider their performance against other methods of inference (such as minimum contrast) in numerical studies. We find that the best MCMLE algorithm is a practical </span></span>proposition for parameter estimation given modern computing power, but the performance of this methodology is rather sensitive to the choice of reference parameters defining the importance sampling distribution.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211675323000349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211675323000349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feasibility of Monte-Carlo maximum likelihood for fitting spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes
Log-Gaussian Cox processes (LGCPs) are a popular and flexible tool for modelling point pattern data. While maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of such a model is attractive in principle, the likelihood function is not available in closed form. Various Monte Carlo approximations have been proposed, but these have seen very limited use in the literature and are often dismissed as impractical. This article provides a comprehensive study of the computational properties of Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation (MCMLE) for LGCPs. We compare various importance sampling algorithms for MCMLE, and also consider their performance against other methods of inference (such as minimum contrast) in numerical studies. We find that the best MCMLE algorithm is a practical proposition for parameter estimation given modern computing power, but the performance of this methodology is rather sensitive to the choice of reference parameters defining the importance sampling distribution.