分析天津、天津、拉斯维加斯、新里诺、孟古纳坎、安特里安、垂尾

Dony Fahrudy, Bambang Sugiantoro
{"title":"分析天津、天津、拉斯维加斯、新里诺、孟古纳坎、安特里安、垂尾","authors":"Dony Fahrudy, Bambang Sugiantoro","doi":"10.14421/jiska.2022.7.1.20-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TCP was developed to deal with problems that often occur in the network, such as congestion problems. Congestion can occur when the number of packets transmitted in the network approaches the network capacity which can cause network problems. This can be overcome by implementing TCP and queue management. In this research, we will test the performance of TCP Newreno and TCP Vegas using NS-2 in the Drop Tail queue. The performance parameters used are throughput, packet drop, and congestion window with additional buffer capacity. The test results for the congestion window and packet drop parameters, TCP Vegas has better performance when the buffer gets bigger when congestion occurs with the congestion window smaller than TCP New Reno and the average packet drop is 18.33 packets compared to TCP New Reno with an average of 18.33 packets. average 41.67 packets. For throughput parameters, TCP New Reno has better performance with an average of 6.77253 Mbps than TCP Vegas with an average of 4.29693 Mbps. From testing and analysis that TCP Vegas has better performance than TCP New Reno when using Drop Tail queues.","PeriodicalId":34216,"journal":{"name":"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail\",\"authors\":\"Dony Fahrudy, Bambang Sugiantoro\",\"doi\":\"10.14421/jiska.2022.7.1.20-32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"TCP was developed to deal with problems that often occur in the network, such as congestion problems. Congestion can occur when the number of packets transmitted in the network approaches the network capacity which can cause network problems. This can be overcome by implementing TCP and queue management. In this research, we will test the performance of TCP Newreno and TCP Vegas using NS-2 in the Drop Tail queue. The performance parameters used are throughput, packet drop, and congestion window with additional buffer capacity. The test results for the congestion window and packet drop parameters, TCP Vegas has better performance when the buffer gets bigger when congestion occurs with the congestion window smaller than TCP New Reno and the average packet drop is 18.33 packets compared to TCP New Reno with an average of 18.33 packets. average 41.67 packets. For throughput parameters, TCP New Reno has better performance with an average of 6.77253 Mbps than TCP Vegas with an average of 4.29693 Mbps. From testing and analysis that TCP Vegas has better performance than TCP New Reno when using Drop Tail queues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14421/jiska.2022.7.1.20-32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/jiska.2022.7.1.20-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

TCP的开发是为了解决网络中经常出现的问题,例如拥塞问题。当网络中传输的数据包数量接近网络容量时,可能会发生拥塞,这可能会导致网络问题。这可以通过实现TCP和队列管理来克服。在本研究中,我们将在Drop-Tail队列中使用NS-2测试TCP Newreno和TCP Vegas的性能。使用的性能参数是吞吐量、数据包丢弃和具有额外缓冲容量的拥塞窗口。对拥塞窗口和丢包参数的测试结果表明,当拥塞窗口小于TCP New Reno时,当缓冲区变大时,TCP Vegas具有更好的性能,与平均18.33包的TCP New Reno相比,平均丢包为18.33包。平均41.67个数据包。在吞吐量参数方面,TCP New Reno的平均性能为6.77253 Mbps,比TCP Vegas的平均性能4.29693 Mbps要好。通过测试和分析,TCP Vegas在使用Drop Tail队列时比TCP New Reno具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail
TCP was developed to deal with problems that often occur in the network, such as congestion problems. Congestion can occur when the number of packets transmitted in the network approaches the network capacity which can cause network problems. This can be overcome by implementing TCP and queue management. In this research, we will test the performance of TCP Newreno and TCP Vegas using NS-2 in the Drop Tail queue. The performance parameters used are throughput, packet drop, and congestion window with additional buffer capacity. The test results for the congestion window and packet drop parameters, TCP Vegas has better performance when the buffer gets bigger when congestion occurs with the congestion window smaller than TCP New Reno and the average packet drop is 18.33 packets compared to TCP New Reno with an average of 18.33 packets. average 41.67 packets. For throughput parameters, TCP New Reno has better performance with an average of 6.77253 Mbps than TCP Vegas with an average of 4.29693 Mbps. From testing and analysis that TCP Vegas has better performance than TCP New Reno when using Drop Tail queues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pemodelan Proses Bisnis Kuliah Online MOOCs menggunakan BPMN (Studi Kasus alison.com) Analisis Bibliometrik Publikasi Isu Kebocoran Data Menggunakan VOSviewer Klasifikasi Sentimen Masyarakat Terhadap Proses Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara (IKN) Indonesia pada Media Sosial Twitter Menggunakan Metode Naïve Bayes Klasifikasi Tingkat Kerusakan Sektor Pasca Bencana Alam Menggunakan Metode MULTIMOORA Berbasis Web Pembuatan Ergonomic Mechanical Keyboard untuk Mengurangi Cidera Tangan Menggunakan Teknologi Arduino
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1