IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY FILOZOFIA Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI:10.31577/filozofia.2022.77.8.2
Lukáš H. Zámečník
{"title":"Explanační monismus u nekauzálních vysvětlení","authors":"Lukáš H. Zámečník","doi":"10.31577/filozofia.2022.77.8.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates possible forms of explanatory monism for the cases of non-causal explanations (primarily Reutlinger 2018; Woodward 2018). In the conceptual analysis, the advantages and weaknesses of the counterfactual view of explanation are examined. Although this conception of explanation provides a common explanatory framework, it cannot sufficiently take into account the specificity of individual nomic generalizations and, in the non-causal case, it is difficult to construct a non-interventionist form of counterfactual. Therefore, the paper offers a return to the unificacionist view of explanation (primarily Kitcher 1981), which is a type of explanatory monism, does not suffer from the men-tioned problems, and also offers a solution to the problem of asymmetry of non-causal explanations.","PeriodicalId":44340,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILOZOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2022.77.8.2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了非因果解释情况下解释一元论的可能形式(主要是Reutlinger 2018;Woodward 2018)。在概念分析中,考察了反事实解释观的优缺点。尽管这种解释概念提供了一个共同的解释框架,但它不能充分考虑到个体经济学概括的特殊性,而且在非因果的情况下,很难构建一种反事实的非干预形式。因此,本文回归了解释的统一论观点(主要是Kitcher 1981),这是一种解释一元论,不受人为问题的影响,也解决了非因果解释的不对称问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explanační monismus u nekauzálních vysvětlení
The paper investigates possible forms of explanatory monism for the cases of non-causal explanations (primarily Reutlinger 2018; Woodward 2018). In the conceptual analysis, the advantages and weaknesses of the counterfactual view of explanation are examined. Although this conception of explanation provides a common explanatory framework, it cannot sufficiently take into account the specificity of individual nomic generalizations and, in the non-causal case, it is difficult to construct a non-interventionist form of counterfactual. Therefore, the paper offers a return to the unificacionist view of explanation (primarily Kitcher 1981), which is a type of explanatory monism, does not suffer from the men-tioned problems, and also offers a solution to the problem of asymmetry of non-causal explanations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FILOZOFIA
FILOZOFIA PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Filozofia publishes original articles in a wide range of areas including metaphysics, epistemology, history of philosophy, social and political philosophy, philosophy of mind, ethics, philosophy of religion and related disciplines. The journal is published monthly, with the exception of July and August, i.e. ten issues yearly. The articles are accepted in Slovak, Czech and English languages.
期刊最新文献
Capitalism, Communism, Environmentalism, and the Ideology of Freedom Internal History of Philosophy Climate Activism, Sovereignty, and the Role of States: Envisioning Post-Liberal Climate Governance Freedom in the Anthropocene: Bringing Political Philosophy to Global Environmental Problems On Global Environmental Citizenship in the Context of the Anthropocene and the Deepening Environmental Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1