医疗保健专业人员的共同道德决策

Darja Lasič, Sedina Kalender Smajlović
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员的共同道德决策","authors":"Darja Lasič, Sedina Kalender Smajlović","doi":"10.14528/snr.2023.57.2.3153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Making shared ethical decisions about patients' further healthcare involves coordinating the opinions of healthcare professionals, and patients and their relatives. The purpose of the research was to examine the joint ethical decision-making of healthcare professionals.Methods: A review of the scientific literature performed in the COBISS, Springer Link and PubMed databases was used. To search for literature in the Slovenian language, the following words were used: \"etika\", \"zdravstveni delavci\", \"skupne odločitve\" and in the English language: \"ethics\", \"health professionals\", \"shared decision making\". The literature review was carried out using the PRISMA diagram. Results were synthesized using thematic analysis.Results: 19 articles were included in the final analysis. We created three thematic categories: (1) ethical competence of healthcare workers, (2) problems in the area of joint ethical decision-making and (3) new approaches to joint ethical decision-making to improve outcomes in clinical practice. In the field of joint ethical decision-making of healthcare professionals, the importance of ethical competence, issues in the field of joint ethical decision-making and new approaches to joint ethical decision-making for improving results in clinical practice is demonstrated.Discussion and conclusion: The findings of the research contribute to illuminating the importance of joint ethical decision-making and giving an insight into the factors of joint ethical decision-making. The end result of certain ethical decisions that affect the interaction of healthcare professionals and all levels in healthcare are important.","PeriodicalId":32258,"journal":{"name":"Obzornik zdravstvene nege","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skupno etično odločanje zdravstvenih delavcev\",\"authors\":\"Darja Lasič, Sedina Kalender Smajlović\",\"doi\":\"10.14528/snr.2023.57.2.3153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Making shared ethical decisions about patients' further healthcare involves coordinating the opinions of healthcare professionals, and patients and their relatives. The purpose of the research was to examine the joint ethical decision-making of healthcare professionals.Methods: A review of the scientific literature performed in the COBISS, Springer Link and PubMed databases was used. To search for literature in the Slovenian language, the following words were used: \\\"etika\\\", \\\"zdravstveni delavci\\\", \\\"skupne odločitve\\\" and in the English language: \\\"ethics\\\", \\\"health professionals\\\", \\\"shared decision making\\\". The literature review was carried out using the PRISMA diagram. Results were synthesized using thematic analysis.Results: 19 articles were included in the final analysis. We created three thematic categories: (1) ethical competence of healthcare workers, (2) problems in the area of joint ethical decision-making and (3) new approaches to joint ethical decision-making to improve outcomes in clinical practice. In the field of joint ethical decision-making of healthcare professionals, the importance of ethical competence, issues in the field of joint ethical decision-making and new approaches to joint ethical decision-making for improving results in clinical practice is demonstrated.Discussion and conclusion: The findings of the research contribute to illuminating the importance of joint ethical decision-making and giving an insight into the factors of joint ethical decision-making. The end result of certain ethical decisions that affect the interaction of healthcare professionals and all levels in healthcare are important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obzornik zdravstvene nege\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obzornik zdravstvene nege\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2023.57.2.3153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obzornik zdravstvene nege","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2023.57.2.3153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:就患者的进一步医疗保健做出共同的道德决策涉及协调医疗保健专业人员、患者及其亲属的意见。这项研究的目的是检验医疗保健专业人员的共同道德决策。方法:对COBISS、Springer Link和PubMed数据库中的科学文献进行综述。为了搜索斯洛文尼亚语的文献,使用了以下单词:“etika”、“zdravstveni delavci”、“skupne odločitve”和英语:“伦理学”、“卫生专业人员”、“共同决策”。文献综述采用PRISMA图进行。结果采用专题分析法进行综合。结果:纳入最终分析的文章有19篇。我们创建了三个主题类别:(1)医护人员的道德能力,(2)联合道德决策领域的问题,以及(3)联合伦理决策的新方法,以改善临床实践的结果。在医疗保健专业人员的联合伦理决策领域,展示了伦理能力的重要性、联合伦理决策中的问题以及联合伦理决策的新方法,以提高临床实践的效果。讨论与结论:研究结果有助于阐明联合伦理决策的重要性,并深入了解联合伦理决策中的因素。影响医疗保健专业人员和医疗保健各个层面互动的某些道德决策的最终结果很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Skupno etično odločanje zdravstvenih delavcev
Introduction: Making shared ethical decisions about patients' further healthcare involves coordinating the opinions of healthcare professionals, and patients and their relatives. The purpose of the research was to examine the joint ethical decision-making of healthcare professionals.Methods: A review of the scientific literature performed in the COBISS, Springer Link and PubMed databases was used. To search for literature in the Slovenian language, the following words were used: "etika", "zdravstveni delavci", "skupne odločitve" and in the English language: "ethics", "health professionals", "shared decision making". The literature review was carried out using the PRISMA diagram. Results were synthesized using thematic analysis.Results: 19 articles were included in the final analysis. We created three thematic categories: (1) ethical competence of healthcare workers, (2) problems in the area of joint ethical decision-making and (3) new approaches to joint ethical decision-making to improve outcomes in clinical practice. In the field of joint ethical decision-making of healthcare professionals, the importance of ethical competence, issues in the field of joint ethical decision-making and new approaches to joint ethical decision-making for improving results in clinical practice is demonstrated.Discussion and conclusion: The findings of the research contribute to illuminating the importance of joint ethical decision-making and giving an insight into the factors of joint ethical decision-making. The end result of certain ethical decisions that affect the interaction of healthcare professionals and all levels in healthcare are important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Čustveno soočanje s posledicami življenjsko ogrožajočih zdravstvenih stanj Challenges to make patient engagement result in more sustainable pharmaceutical care Spolna zdravstvena pismenost slovenskih srednješolcev Vpliv porodnega položaja pri iztisu ploda na poškodbo presredka impact of an educational intervention on fertility awareness of healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1