碳税调整值

SSRN Pub Date : 2022-02-15 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3974773
David Blitz, T. Hoogteijling
{"title":"碳税调整值","authors":"David Blitz, T. Hoogteijling","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3974773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors examine the effects of incorporating a potential tax on carbon emissions into a value investment strategy. They show that in a portfolio optimization problem, a carbon tax at the stock level is mathematically equivalent to a carbon constraint at the portfolio level. Using this insight, the authors derive a value–carbon efficient frontier that reflects the trade-off between a high value exposure and a low carbon footprint. Empirically, they find that carbon taxes up to $100, corresponding to a portfolio carbon footprint reduction of about 50%, have little effect on the characteristics and performance of the long side of a value strategy. More aggressive footprint reduction targets require progressively higher, less realistic carbon tax levels that do erode the magnitude of the value premium.","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":"48 1","pages":"121 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon-Tax-Adjusted Value\",\"authors\":\"David Blitz, T. Hoogteijling\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3974773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors examine the effects of incorporating a potential tax on carbon emissions into a value investment strategy. They show that in a portfolio optimization problem, a carbon tax at the stock level is mathematically equivalent to a carbon constraint at the portfolio level. Using this insight, the authors derive a value–carbon efficient frontier that reflects the trade-off between a high value exposure and a low carbon footprint. Empirically, they find that carbon taxes up to $100, corresponding to a portfolio carbon footprint reduction of about 50%, have little effect on the characteristics and performance of the long side of a value strategy. More aggressive footprint reduction targets require progressively higher, less realistic carbon tax levels that do erode the magnitude of the value premium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSRN\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSRN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3974773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3974773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者研究了将潜在的碳排放税纳入价值投资策略的影响。他们表明,在投资组合优化问题中,股票水平上的碳税在数学上等同于投资组合水平上的碳约束。利用这一见解,作者得出了一个价值-碳效率边界,反映了高价值暴露和低碳足迹之间的权衡。根据经验,他们发现高达100美元的碳税,相当于投资组合碳足迹减少了约50%,对价值策略的长期特征和表现几乎没有影响。更积极的碳足迹减少目标要求逐步提高、不太现实的碳税水平,这确实会侵蚀价值溢价的幅度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbon-Tax-Adjusted Value
The authors examine the effects of incorporating a potential tax on carbon emissions into a value investment strategy. They show that in a portfolio optimization problem, a carbon tax at the stock level is mathematically equivalent to a carbon constraint at the portfolio level. Using this insight, the authors derive a value–carbon efficient frontier that reflects the trade-off between a high value exposure and a low carbon footprint. Empirically, they find that carbon taxes up to $100, corresponding to a portfolio carbon footprint reduction of about 50%, have little effect on the characteristics and performance of the long side of a value strategy. More aggressive footprint reduction targets require progressively higher, less realistic carbon tax levels that do erode the magnitude of the value premium.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stocks as a Hedge against Inflation: Does Corporate Profitability Keep Up with Inflation? How Useful Is a Prospectus in Identifying Greenwashing versus True ESG Funds? Beyond Direct Indexing: Dynamic Direct Long-Short Investing The Hidden Cost in Costless Put-Spread Collars: Rebalance Timing Luck Investing in Carbon Credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1