评估古生态记录中与生态基线的距离和随时间变化的指南

IF 1.6 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Holocene Pub Date : 2023-04-29 DOI:10.1177/09596836231169986
O. Burge, S. Richardson, Jamie R. Wood, J. Wilmshurst
{"title":"评估古生态记录中与生态基线的距离和随时间变化的指南","authors":"O. Burge, S. Richardson, Jamie R. Wood, J. Wilmshurst","doi":"10.1177/09596836231169986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Palaeoecology provides critical data for establishing ecological ‘baselines’, which can guide restoration efforts and be used to assess ecosystem change. However, statistical analyses can be challenging because of the large number of methods available for establishing palaeoecological baselines combined with a lack of practical guidance, particularly around quantifying baselines that include natural variability. We contribute one solution by providing guidance and an R package baselines for using palaeoecological data to (i) define baselines and (ii) test for change over time that incorporates variability. These methods provide an alternative to single-taxon analyses and allow ecosystem complexity to be captured. We use published pollen records as case studies to demonstrate how to establish vegetation baselines for seven localities in New Zealand where relatively recent (c. 1280 AD) and near-simultaneous human settlement across the country allows background environmental disturbance in the pre-human era to be distinguished from anthropogenic disturbance. We present methods for calculating distance from initial sample, distance from baseline in ordination space, allowing incorporation of ecosystem variability, and analysis of rates of change over time using principal curves. We found conventional and Bayesian ordination methods yielded similar results and were effective at identifying change following human settlement, despite the potential for a positive mean-variance relationship to confound results. Principal response curves were most sensitive to a known period of vegetation disturbance caused by volcanic eruptions at two sites with tephra deposits. Our proposed methods, case study and R package baselines are designed to provide a suite of tools to encourage and enable palaeoecological data to be used by palaeoecologists to assess trajectories and change over time, and monitor whether historical management actions have facilitated a change in direction towards a desired baseline state.","PeriodicalId":50402,"journal":{"name":"Holocene","volume":"33 1","pages":"905 - 917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A guide to assess distance from ecological baselines and change over time in palaeoecological records\",\"authors\":\"O. Burge, S. Richardson, Jamie R. Wood, J. Wilmshurst\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09596836231169986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Palaeoecology provides critical data for establishing ecological ‘baselines’, which can guide restoration efforts and be used to assess ecosystem change. However, statistical analyses can be challenging because of the large number of methods available for establishing palaeoecological baselines combined with a lack of practical guidance, particularly around quantifying baselines that include natural variability. We contribute one solution by providing guidance and an R package baselines for using palaeoecological data to (i) define baselines and (ii) test for change over time that incorporates variability. These methods provide an alternative to single-taxon analyses and allow ecosystem complexity to be captured. We use published pollen records as case studies to demonstrate how to establish vegetation baselines for seven localities in New Zealand where relatively recent (c. 1280 AD) and near-simultaneous human settlement across the country allows background environmental disturbance in the pre-human era to be distinguished from anthropogenic disturbance. We present methods for calculating distance from initial sample, distance from baseline in ordination space, allowing incorporation of ecosystem variability, and analysis of rates of change over time using principal curves. We found conventional and Bayesian ordination methods yielded similar results and were effective at identifying change following human settlement, despite the potential for a positive mean-variance relationship to confound results. Principal response curves were most sensitive to a known period of vegetation disturbance caused by volcanic eruptions at two sites with tephra deposits. Our proposed methods, case study and R package baselines are designed to provide a suite of tools to encourage and enable palaeoecological data to be used by palaeoecologists to assess trajectories and change over time, and monitor whether historical management actions have facilitated a change in direction towards a desired baseline state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Holocene\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"905 - 917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Holocene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09596836231169986\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Holocene","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09596836231169986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

古生态学为建立生态“基线”提供了关键数据,可以指导恢复工作并用于评估生态系统变化。然而,统计分析可能具有挑战性,因为建立古生态基线的方法很多,而且缺乏实际指导,特别是在量化包括自然变率在内的基线方面。我们提供了一个解决方案,通过提供指导和R包基线来使用古生态数据来(i)定义基线和(ii)测试随时间的变化,包括可变性。这些方法为单分类分析提供了另一种选择,并允许捕获生态系统的复杂性。我们使用已发表的花粉记录作为案例研究,展示了如何在新西兰的7个地点建立植被基线,这些地点相对较近(约公元1280年),全国各地几乎同时有人类定居,可以将前人类时代的背景环境干扰与人为干扰区分开来。我们提出了计算与初始样本的距离的方法,在协调空间中与基线的距离,允许纳入生态系统变异性,并使用主曲线分析随时间的变化率。我们发现传统和贝叶斯排序方法产生了相似的结果,并且在识别人类定居后的变化方面是有效的,尽管可能存在正均值方差关系来混淆结果。主响应曲线对已知时期火山喷发引起的植被扰动最为敏感。我们提出的方法、案例研究和R包基线旨在提供一套工具,鼓励并使古生态学家能够使用古生态数据来评估轨迹和随时间的变化,并监测历史管理行动是否促进了向预期基线状态的方向变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A guide to assess distance from ecological baselines and change over time in palaeoecological records
Palaeoecology provides critical data for establishing ecological ‘baselines’, which can guide restoration efforts and be used to assess ecosystem change. However, statistical analyses can be challenging because of the large number of methods available for establishing palaeoecological baselines combined with a lack of practical guidance, particularly around quantifying baselines that include natural variability. We contribute one solution by providing guidance and an R package baselines for using palaeoecological data to (i) define baselines and (ii) test for change over time that incorporates variability. These methods provide an alternative to single-taxon analyses and allow ecosystem complexity to be captured. We use published pollen records as case studies to demonstrate how to establish vegetation baselines for seven localities in New Zealand where relatively recent (c. 1280 AD) and near-simultaneous human settlement across the country allows background environmental disturbance in the pre-human era to be distinguished from anthropogenic disturbance. We present methods for calculating distance from initial sample, distance from baseline in ordination space, allowing incorporation of ecosystem variability, and analysis of rates of change over time using principal curves. We found conventional and Bayesian ordination methods yielded similar results and were effective at identifying change following human settlement, despite the potential for a positive mean-variance relationship to confound results. Principal response curves were most sensitive to a known period of vegetation disturbance caused by volcanic eruptions at two sites with tephra deposits. Our proposed methods, case study and R package baselines are designed to provide a suite of tools to encourage and enable palaeoecological data to be used by palaeoecologists to assess trajectories and change over time, and monitor whether historical management actions have facilitated a change in direction towards a desired baseline state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Holocene
Holocene 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Holocene is a high impact, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to fundamental scientific research at the interface between the long Quaternary record and the natural and human-induced environmental processes operating at the Earth''s surface today. The Holocene emphasizes environmental change over the last ca 11 700 years.
期刊最新文献
3D digitization and archaeobotanical analysis of wooden artifacts Inherited age of floating charcoal fragments in a sand-bed stream, Macdonald River, NSW, Australia: Implications for radiocarbon dating of sediments Climate change, site formation, and indigenous use of coastlines in Barbuda Living through changing climates: Temperature and seasonality correlate with population fluctuations among Holocene hunter-fisher-gatherers on the west coast of Norway Northern Norway paleofire records reveal two distinct phases of early human impacts on fire activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1