黑暗黑社会与诈骗钻石交叉点的网络诈骗

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100753
Kenneth J. Smith , David J. Emerson , Shawn Mauldin
{"title":"黑暗黑社会与诈骗钻石交叉点的网络诈骗","authors":"Kenneth J. Smith ,&nbsp;David J. Emerson ,&nbsp;Shawn Mauldin","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Academic misconduct is an issue that has plagued educators for as long as there have been formal performance assessments, and the technological advances in recent years have exacerbated an already vexing problem. Today’s student has a broad array of resources available to assist in their learning process. Unfortunately, many of those resources can be used to actively circumvent that process. A variety of assignment assistance websites offer students fee-based access to content ranging from publisher-provided test banks and homework solutions to course specific material generated by the instructor. Unauthorized access to these materials constitutes academic fraud. In this study we evaluate student use of these websites by developing a comprehensive framework consisting of the Dark Triad constellation of personality traits and the Fraud Diamond elements. We find that each Dark Triad trait exerts a unique influence on the Fraud Diamond elements, which in turn are associated with students’ intentions to access and use these websites.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online cheating at the intersection of the dark triad and fraud diamond\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth J. Smith ,&nbsp;David J. Emerson ,&nbsp;Shawn Mauldin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Academic misconduct is an issue that has plagued educators for as long as there have been formal performance assessments, and the technological advances in recent years have exacerbated an already vexing problem. Today’s student has a broad array of resources available to assist in their learning process. Unfortunately, many of those resources can be used to actively circumvent that process. A variety of assignment assistance websites offer students fee-based access to content ranging from publisher-provided test banks and homework solutions to course specific material generated by the instructor. Unauthorized access to these materials constitutes academic fraud. In this study we evaluate student use of these websites by developing a comprehensive framework consisting of the Dark Triad constellation of personality traits and the Fraud Diamond elements. We find that each Dark Triad trait exerts a unique influence on the Fraud Diamond elements, which in turn are associated with students’ intentions to access and use these websites.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575121000403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575121000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

自从有正式的绩效评估以来,学术不端行为就一直困扰着教育工作者,近年来的技术进步加剧了这个本已令人烦恼的问题。今天的学生有广泛的资源来帮助他们的学习过程。不幸的是,其中许多资源可以用来积极地规避这一过程。各种各样的作业协助网站为学生提供收费的内容,从出版商提供的测试库和家庭作业解决方案到教师生成的课程特定材料。未经授权访问这些材料构成学术欺诈。在这项研究中,我们通过开发一个综合框架来评估学生对这些网站的使用,该框架由人格特质的黑暗三合一星座和欺诈钻石元素组成。我们发现,每一种黑暗人格特质对欺诈钻石元素都有独特的影响,而欺诈钻石元素又与学生访问和使用这些网站的意图有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Online cheating at the intersection of the dark triad and fraud diamond

Academic misconduct is an issue that has plagued educators for as long as there have been formal performance assessments, and the technological advances in recent years have exacerbated an already vexing problem. Today’s student has a broad array of resources available to assist in their learning process. Unfortunately, many of those resources can be used to actively circumvent that process. A variety of assignment assistance websites offer students fee-based access to content ranging from publisher-provided test banks and homework solutions to course specific material generated by the instructor. Unauthorized access to these materials constitutes academic fraud. In this study we evaluate student use of these websites by developing a comprehensive framework consisting of the Dark Triad constellation of personality traits and the Fraud Diamond elements. We find that each Dark Triad trait exerts a unique influence on the Fraud Diamond elements, which in turn are associated with students’ intentions to access and use these websites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
期刊最新文献
How a color-based teaching method has lifted grades for first-year accounting students Workbook design and controls: A framework Examining the contribution of diverse feedback perspectives during a work-integrated learning intervention Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1