评估数学成绩的性别差异

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL School Psychology International Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI:10.1177/01430343221149689
Yujie Lu, Xuan Zhang, Xinlin Zhou
{"title":"评估数学成绩的性别差异","authors":"Yujie Lu, Xuan Zhang, Xinlin Zhou","doi":"10.1177/01430343221149689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender differences in math-related professional achievements have been identified as a worldwide problem. Academic achievement assessments, however, have repeatedly revealed gender similarities. The observed gender similarity might be due to biased assessments that heavily rely on reading skills, which favors girls. The current study analyzed 29 international and within-country datasets representing a total of 9,471,692 students from 1,456 regions through four typical, large-scale student academic achievement assessments. The results showed a gender difference in mathematics achievements of greater than 0.76 (Cohen's d), favoring boys for each dataset after controlling for general reading achievements. The gender difference in mathematics achievements favoring boys exceeded 0.35 in each region, with a mean of 0.70 for 79 countries or jurisdictions in the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2018) after controlling for general reading achievements. Dataset- and region-level gender differences are robust, suggesting that there is a clear gender difference in mathematics achievements that previous analyses have not identified due to the effect of reading achievements differences.","PeriodicalId":47723,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology International","volume":"44 1","pages":"553 - 567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing gender difference in mathematics achievement\",\"authors\":\"Yujie Lu, Xuan Zhang, Xinlin Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01430343221149689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gender differences in math-related professional achievements have been identified as a worldwide problem. Academic achievement assessments, however, have repeatedly revealed gender similarities. The observed gender similarity might be due to biased assessments that heavily rely on reading skills, which favors girls. The current study analyzed 29 international and within-country datasets representing a total of 9,471,692 students from 1,456 regions through four typical, large-scale student academic achievement assessments. The results showed a gender difference in mathematics achievements of greater than 0.76 (Cohen's d), favoring boys for each dataset after controlling for general reading achievements. The gender difference in mathematics achievements favoring boys exceeded 0.35 in each region, with a mean of 0.70 for 79 countries or jurisdictions in the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2018) after controlling for general reading achievements. Dataset- and region-level gender differences are robust, suggesting that there is a clear gender difference in mathematics achievements that previous analyses have not identified due to the effect of reading achievements differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Psychology International\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"553 - 567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Psychology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343221149689\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology International","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343221149689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数学相关专业成就的性别差异已被认为是一个全球性问题。然而,学业成绩评估一再显示出性别相似性。观察到的性别相似性可能是由于严重依赖阅读技能的有偏见的评估,这种评估对女孩更有利。目前的研究通过四次典型的大规模学生学业成绩评估,分析了29个国际和国内数据集,代表了来自1456个地区的9,471,692名学生。结果显示,数学成绩的性别差异大于0.76 (Cohen’s d),在控制了一般阅读成绩后,每个数据集都倾向于男孩。在2018年国际学生评估项目(PISA 2018)中,男生在数学成绩上的性别差异超过0.35,在控制了一般阅读成绩后,79个国家或地区的平均成绩为0.70。数据集和地区层面的性别差异是稳健的,这表明数学成绩存在明显的性别差异,而之前的分析并未发现这一差异,因为阅读成绩差异的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing gender difference in mathematics achievement
Gender differences in math-related professional achievements have been identified as a worldwide problem. Academic achievement assessments, however, have repeatedly revealed gender similarities. The observed gender similarity might be due to biased assessments that heavily rely on reading skills, which favors girls. The current study analyzed 29 international and within-country datasets representing a total of 9,471,692 students from 1,456 regions through four typical, large-scale student academic achievement assessments. The results showed a gender difference in mathematics achievements of greater than 0.76 (Cohen's d), favoring boys for each dataset after controlling for general reading achievements. The gender difference in mathematics achievements favoring boys exceeded 0.35 in each region, with a mean of 0.70 for 79 countries or jurisdictions in the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2018) after controlling for general reading achievements. Dataset- and region-level gender differences are robust, suggesting that there is a clear gender difference in mathematics achievements that previous analyses have not identified due to the effect of reading achievements differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology International
School Psychology International PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The official publication of the ISPA. School Psychology International highlights the concerns of those who provide quality mental health, educational, therapeutic and support services to schools and their communities throughout the world. The Journal publishes a wide range of original empirical research, cross-cultural replications of promising procedures and descriptions of technology transfer
期刊最新文献
“It takes a village”: An ecological analysis of social and emotional learning environments in Malawi Provision of educational psychological services under a high inflationary environment in Masvingo Province, Zimbabwe The role of teachers’ social and emotional competence in implementing social and emotional learning (SEL) curriculum in Malawi Botho/Ubuntu paradigm as cognitive justice in psychology School psychologists’ training to support inclusive education in Portugal: Trainers’ perspectives of opportunities, challenges, and improvements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1