罗曼·汉克尔恩(编),《政治平原?中世纪圣徒办公室的音乐、文本和历史背景,Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen/音乐学研究91(印刷错误为111)。渥太华:中世纪音乐学院,2009年。vi+229页,80欧元。是978 1 896926 97 5。

IF 0.5 1区 艺术学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Plainsong & Medieval Music Pub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI:10.1017/S0961137117000183
P. Mannaerts
{"title":"罗曼·汉克尔恩(编),《政治平原?中世纪圣徒办公室的音乐、文本和历史背景,Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen/音乐学研究91(印刷错误为111)。渥太华:中世纪音乐学院,2009年。vi+229页,80欧元。是978 1 896926 97 5。","authors":"P. Mannaerts","doi":"10.1017/S0961137117000183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of the Ordo Paginarum that she cites as her source for this entry. Indeed, surrounding entries given for York account book A/Y in REED/York refer to guild activity (see REED/York, II, pp. 622–3), while the references in the Ordo Paginarum are to the Corpus Christi procession of 1415. Other issues are evident as well. It was probably the block format used in the text editions that masked for both author and proofreader the two lines omitted from the first and third stanzas of Nos respectu gratie (RH 12241) in the settings from Besançon (B1–B3, p. 303). There are also a number of proofreading anomalies. Space does not permit an exhaustive list, so I offer a few examples here. The manuscript number given for Morandi’s sources N3A and N3B should be ‘nouv. acq. lat. 1235’ and not ‘lat. 1235’ (pp. xxix, 90, 332, 396 and 436). The reference to O quam dignis should be RH 13496 rather than 12496 (p. 77, n. 60), while that for Novae genitura should be RH 12329 rather than 12635 (p. 118, n. 108). The siglum for the Salisbury source is given variously as S (pp. xiv, n. 13, xxx, 119, 129 138 and 154) and Sa (pp. 4, 33 and 198). The manuscript number for the Vienna manuscript (Wi) is given as MS 552 in the list of witnesses (p. xxx) but as MS 442 elsewhere. In addition, a number of references given in the notes do not point to the correct locations. The citation from Dunbar Ogden mentioned above with respect to the Regensburg source, for example, is misplaced. On the page referenced (Ogden, p. 40), Ogden describes a fifteenth-century Visitatio Sepulchri from Regensburg and not the Officium Stellae. These issues notwithstanding, Nausica Morandi has provided an invaluable resource that can offer us a deeper understanding of the Officium Stellae should we be willing to make the effort. While one may quibble over her choices for organisation, presentation and formatting, Morandi’s provision of the complete textual and musical information for these sources makes possible investigations into aspects of these settings well beyond those that prompted and guided her presentation. The Officium Stellae is the one office among those labelled ‘liturgical drama’ that really does not seem to fit. Morandi’s study, and her editions in particular, offer the resources needed to allow future scholars to better understand the nature and history of this most peculiar office and its place both within and without the liturgy.","PeriodicalId":41539,"journal":{"name":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0961137117000183","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roman Hankeln (ed.), Political Plainchant? Music, Text and Historical Context of Medieval Saints’ Offices, Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen/Musicological Studies 91 (misprinted as 111). Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 2009. vi + 229 pp. €80. ISBN 978 1 896926 97 5.\",\"authors\":\"P. Mannaerts\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0961137117000183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"of the Ordo Paginarum that she cites as her source for this entry. Indeed, surrounding entries given for York account book A/Y in REED/York refer to guild activity (see REED/York, II, pp. 622–3), while the references in the Ordo Paginarum are to the Corpus Christi procession of 1415. Other issues are evident as well. It was probably the block format used in the text editions that masked for both author and proofreader the two lines omitted from the first and third stanzas of Nos respectu gratie (RH 12241) in the settings from Besançon (B1–B3, p. 303). There are also a number of proofreading anomalies. Space does not permit an exhaustive list, so I offer a few examples here. The manuscript number given for Morandi’s sources N3A and N3B should be ‘nouv. acq. lat. 1235’ and not ‘lat. 1235’ (pp. xxix, 90, 332, 396 and 436). The reference to O quam dignis should be RH 13496 rather than 12496 (p. 77, n. 60), while that for Novae genitura should be RH 12329 rather than 12635 (p. 118, n. 108). The siglum for the Salisbury source is given variously as S (pp. xiv, n. 13, xxx, 119, 129 138 and 154) and Sa (pp. 4, 33 and 198). The manuscript number for the Vienna manuscript (Wi) is given as MS 552 in the list of witnesses (p. xxx) but as MS 442 elsewhere. In addition, a number of references given in the notes do not point to the correct locations. The citation from Dunbar Ogden mentioned above with respect to the Regensburg source, for example, is misplaced. On the page referenced (Ogden, p. 40), Ogden describes a fifteenth-century Visitatio Sepulchri from Regensburg and not the Officium Stellae. These issues notwithstanding, Nausica Morandi has provided an invaluable resource that can offer us a deeper understanding of the Officium Stellae should we be willing to make the effort. While one may quibble over her choices for organisation, presentation and formatting, Morandi’s provision of the complete textual and musical information for these sources makes possible investigations into aspects of these settings well beyond those that prompted and guided her presentation. The Officium Stellae is the one office among those labelled ‘liturgical drama’ that really does not seem to fit. Morandi’s study, and her editions in particular, offer the resources needed to allow future scholars to better understand the nature and history of this most peculiar office and its place both within and without the liturgy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plainsong & Medieval Music\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0961137117000183\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plainsong & Medieval Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0961137117000183\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0961137117000183","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

她引用了奥尔多·帕格纳鲁姆的作品作为她的来源。事实上,REED/York中为York账簿A/Y提供的相关条目指的是公会活动(见REED/York,II,第622-3页),而Ordo Paginarum中的参考文献指的是1415年的科珀斯克里斯蒂游行。其他问题也很明显。可能是文本版本中使用的块格式为作者和校对者掩盖了在Besançon(B1–B3,第303页)的设置中从Nos respectu gratie(RH 12241)的第一节和第三节中省略的两行。还有一些校对异常。篇幅不允许列出详尽的清单,所以我在这里举几个例子。莫兰迪文献N3A和N3B的手稿编号应为“nouv。acq。lat.1235'而非'lat。1235'(第xxix、90、332、396和436页)。O quam dignis的参考文献应为RH 13496,而不是12496(第77页,第60页),而Novae gentura的参考文献则应为RH 12329,而不是12635(第118页,第108页)。索尔兹伯里来源的符号分别为S(第xiv页,第13、xxx、119、129、138和154页)和Sa(第4、33和198页)。维也纳手稿(Wi)的手稿编号在证人名单(第xxx页)中为MS 552,但在其他地方为MS 442。此外,注释中给出的一些参考文献没有指向正确的位置。例如,上面提到的Dunbar Ogden关于雷根斯堡消息来源的引文是错误的。在引用的页面上(Ogden,第40页),Ogden描述了一个来自雷根斯堡的十五世纪的Visitatio Sepulchri,而不是Officium Stellae。尽管存在这些问题,Nausica Morandi提供了宝贵的资源,如果我们愿意努力,可以让我们更深入地了解Officium Stellae。虽然人们可能会对她的组织、呈现和格式选择提出质疑,但莫兰迪为这些来源提供了完整的文本和音乐信息,这使得对这些背景的各个方面的调查成为可能,远远超出了促使和指导她的呈现的方面。在那些被贴上“礼拜戏剧”标签的办公室中,官方Stella是一个似乎真的不适合的办公室。莫兰迪的研究,尤其是她的版本,提供了所需的资源,让未来的学者更好地了解这个最独特的办公室的性质和历史,以及它在礼拜仪式内外的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Roman Hankeln (ed.), Political Plainchant? Music, Text and Historical Context of Medieval Saints’ Offices, Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen/Musicological Studies 91 (misprinted as 111). Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 2009. vi + 229 pp. €80. ISBN 978 1 896926 97 5.
of the Ordo Paginarum that she cites as her source for this entry. Indeed, surrounding entries given for York account book A/Y in REED/York refer to guild activity (see REED/York, II, pp. 622–3), while the references in the Ordo Paginarum are to the Corpus Christi procession of 1415. Other issues are evident as well. It was probably the block format used in the text editions that masked for both author and proofreader the two lines omitted from the first and third stanzas of Nos respectu gratie (RH 12241) in the settings from Besançon (B1–B3, p. 303). There are also a number of proofreading anomalies. Space does not permit an exhaustive list, so I offer a few examples here. The manuscript number given for Morandi’s sources N3A and N3B should be ‘nouv. acq. lat. 1235’ and not ‘lat. 1235’ (pp. xxix, 90, 332, 396 and 436). The reference to O quam dignis should be RH 13496 rather than 12496 (p. 77, n. 60), while that for Novae genitura should be RH 12329 rather than 12635 (p. 118, n. 108). The siglum for the Salisbury source is given variously as S (pp. xiv, n. 13, xxx, 119, 129 138 and 154) and Sa (pp. 4, 33 and 198). The manuscript number for the Vienna manuscript (Wi) is given as MS 552 in the list of witnesses (p. xxx) but as MS 442 elsewhere. In addition, a number of references given in the notes do not point to the correct locations. The citation from Dunbar Ogden mentioned above with respect to the Regensburg source, for example, is misplaced. On the page referenced (Ogden, p. 40), Ogden describes a fifteenth-century Visitatio Sepulchri from Regensburg and not the Officium Stellae. These issues notwithstanding, Nausica Morandi has provided an invaluable resource that can offer us a deeper understanding of the Officium Stellae should we be willing to make the effort. While one may quibble over her choices for organisation, presentation and formatting, Morandi’s provision of the complete textual and musical information for these sources makes possible investigations into aspects of these settings well beyond those that prompted and guided her presentation. The Officium Stellae is the one office among those labelled ‘liturgical drama’ that really does not seem to fit. Morandi’s study, and her editions in particular, offer the resources needed to allow future scholars to better understand the nature and history of this most peculiar office and its place both within and without the liturgy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Plainsong & Medieval Music is published twice a year in association with the Plainsong and Medieval Music Society and Cantus Planus, study group of the International Musicological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of medieval music: Eastern and Western chant, secular lyric, music theory, palaeography, performance practice, and medieval polyphony, both sacred and secular, as well as the history of musical institutions. The chronological scope of the journal extends from late antiquity to the early Renaissance and to the present day in the case of chant. In addition to book reviews in each issue, a comprehensive bibliography of chant research and a discography of recent and re-issued plainchant recordings appear annually.
期刊最新文献
Ornamental melismas in Aquitanian introits PMM volume 32 issue 1 Cover and Back matter Preacher and prophet: intersecting voices of St John the Evangelist in late medieval ‘s-Hertogenbosch Commemorating the Virgin Mary at Barking Abbey: Cambridge, University Library, Dd.12.56 PMM volume 32 issue 1 Cover and Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1