这不(只是)关于成本:学术图书馆和有意参与OER促进社会正义

IF 0.3 4区 管理学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library Trends Pub Date : 2021-01-14 DOI:10.1353/lib.2020.0042
Marco Seiferle-Valencia
{"title":"这不(只是)关于成本:学术图书馆和有意参与OER促进社会正义","authors":"Marco Seiferle-Valencia","doi":"10.1353/lib.2020.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:How can librarians seize the radical affordances of OER to complicate standard narratives with the stories of those historically and systemically marginalized? Using work created through the University of Idaho’s Think Open Fellows 2019–20 Cohort as a starting point, the author explores how these projects created OER content that demonstrates Lambert’s three principles of OER and social justice. The author discusses the unique potentials of the academic library to support intentionally engaged OER as well as the responsibility of librarians to center marginalized perspectives in their work with faculty as cocreators and identifiers of OER. A discussion of some of the transformative aspects of this work follows, including the potential impacts on librarians with marginalized identities in creating intentionally engaged OER, as briefly examined through bell hooks’s notion of engaged pedagogy. The article concludes with a call to action, inspired by hooks and Austin, to specifically and intentionally diversify the perspectives represented in the OER we identify and create as librarians.","PeriodicalId":47175,"journal":{"name":"Library Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/lib.2020.0042","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It’s Not (Just) About the Cost: Academic Libraries and Intentionally Engaged OER for Social Justice\",\"authors\":\"Marco Seiferle-Valencia\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/lib.2020.0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:How can librarians seize the radical affordances of OER to complicate standard narratives with the stories of those historically and systemically marginalized? Using work created through the University of Idaho’s Think Open Fellows 2019–20 Cohort as a starting point, the author explores how these projects created OER content that demonstrates Lambert’s three principles of OER and social justice. The author discusses the unique potentials of the academic library to support intentionally engaged OER as well as the responsibility of librarians to center marginalized perspectives in their work with faculty as cocreators and identifiers of OER. A discussion of some of the transformative aspects of this work follows, including the potential impacts on librarians with marginalized identities in creating intentionally engaged OER, as briefly examined through bell hooks’s notion of engaged pedagogy. The article concludes with a call to action, inspired by hooks and Austin, to specifically and intentionally diversify the perspectives represented in the OER we identify and create as librarians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Library Trends\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/lib.2020.0042\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Library Trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2020.0042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Trends","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2020.0042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要:图书馆员如何抓住OER的激进可供性,将那些历史上和系统上被边缘化的人的故事与标准叙事复杂化?作者以爱达荷大学Think Open Fellows 2019-20 Cohort创建的工作为起点,探讨了这些项目如何创建OER内容,展示了Lambert的OER和社会正义三大原则。作者讨论了学术图书馆在支持有意参与的OER方面的独特潜力,以及图书馆员在与教师作为OER的共同创建者和识别者的工作中集中边缘化视角的责任。以下是对这项工作的一些变革性方面的讨论,包括对具有边缘化身份的图书馆员在创建有意参与的OER方面的潜在影响,通过bell hooks的参与教育学概念进行了简要考察。文章最后呼吁采取行动,灵感来自hooks和Austin,具体而有意地使我们作为图书馆员确定和创建的OER中所代表的观点多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
It’s Not (Just) About the Cost: Academic Libraries and Intentionally Engaged OER for Social Justice
Abstract:How can librarians seize the radical affordances of OER to complicate standard narratives with the stories of those historically and systemically marginalized? Using work created through the University of Idaho’s Think Open Fellows 2019–20 Cohort as a starting point, the author explores how these projects created OER content that demonstrates Lambert’s three principles of OER and social justice. The author discusses the unique potentials of the academic library to support intentionally engaged OER as well as the responsibility of librarians to center marginalized perspectives in their work with faculty as cocreators and identifiers of OER. A discussion of some of the transformative aspects of this work follows, including the potential impacts on librarians with marginalized identities in creating intentionally engaged OER, as briefly examined through bell hooks’s notion of engaged pedagogy. The article concludes with a call to action, inspired by hooks and Austin, to specifically and intentionally diversify the perspectives represented in the OER we identify and create as librarians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Library Trends
Library Trends INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Library Trends, issued quarterly and edited by F. W. Lancaster, explores critical trends in professional librarianship, including practical applications, thorough analyses, and literature reviews. Both practicing librarians and educators use Library Trends as an essential tool in their professional development and continuing education. Each issue is devoted to a single aspect of professional activity or interest. In-depth, thoughtful articles explore important facets of the issue topic. Every year, Library Trends provides breadth, covering a wide variety of themes, from special libraries to emerging technologies. An invaluable resource to practicing librarians and educators, the journal is an important tool that is utilized for professional development and continuing education.
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Copyright Alternative in Small Claims Enforcement (CASE) Act in an Education and Library Environment Linda C. Smith: Fifty Years of Library and Information Science Education by Design Closing the Loop: Bridging Machine Learning (ML) Research and Library Systems Modeling of Serials The Renaissance Scholar of Library and Information Science: Professor Linda C. Smith
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1