瑞典应对新冠肺炎的方法——基于国家自我形象

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.4000/rccs.13440
A. Kubai
{"title":"瑞典应对新冠肺炎的方法——基于国家自我形象","authors":"A. Kubai","doi":"10.4000/rccs.13440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of the Pandemic, Sweden took a different path from her Nordic neighbours and many other countries, namely by not implementing a \"forced mass lockdown\" or applying stringent restrictions. This paper sets out to examine Sweden s national strategy for responding to COVID-19. This research seeks to address the extent to which the underlying concepts of Swedish \"ethos\" and \"tradition\" influenced or shaped the national strategy to avoid forced mass lockdown during the pandemic. To prevent an enforced lockdown to control the spread of COVID-19, the Swedish government presented a range of different measures, both \"voluntary and legally binding\". The strategy employed by the Public Health Authority was based on notions of \"individual responsibility\" and \"mutual trust\" between the government and the citizenry. The guidelines were often ambiguous and left to individuals to interpret for themselves. © 2022 Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":54161,"journal":{"name":"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sweden’s Approach to COVID-19 in the Context of a Poised National Self-Image\",\"authors\":\"A. Kubai\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/rccs.13440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the beginning of the Pandemic, Sweden took a different path from her Nordic neighbours and many other countries, namely by not implementing a \\\"forced mass lockdown\\\" or applying stringent restrictions. This paper sets out to examine Sweden s national strategy for responding to COVID-19. This research seeks to address the extent to which the underlying concepts of Swedish \\\"ethos\\\" and \\\"tradition\\\" influenced or shaped the national strategy to avoid forced mass lockdown during the pandemic. To prevent an enforced lockdown to control the spread of COVID-19, the Swedish government presented a range of different measures, both \\\"voluntary and legally binding\\\". The strategy employed by the Public Health Authority was based on notions of \\\"individual responsibility\\\" and \\\"mutual trust\\\" between the government and the citizenry. The guidelines were often ambiguous and left to individuals to interpret for themselves. © 2022 Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.13440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.13440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在大流行病开始时,瑞典走了一条与北欧邻国和许多其他国家不同的道路,即不实施“强制大规模封锁”或实施严格的限制。本文旨在研究瑞典应对新冠肺炎的国家战略。这项研究试图探讨瑞典“民族精神”和“传统”的基本概念在多大程度上影响或塑造了国家战略,以避免疫情期间的强制大规模封锁。为了防止强制封锁以控制新冠肺炎的传播,瑞典政府提出了一系列不同的措施,既有“自愿的,也有法律约束力的”。公共卫生局采用的战略基于政府和公民之间的“个人责任”和“互信”概念。指导方针往往含糊不清,由个人自行解释。©2022科英布拉大学社会科学中心。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sweden’s Approach to COVID-19 in the Context of a Poised National Self-Image
At the beginning of the Pandemic, Sweden took a different path from her Nordic neighbours and many other countries, namely by not implementing a "forced mass lockdown" or applying stringent restrictions. This paper sets out to examine Sweden s national strategy for responding to COVID-19. This research seeks to address the extent to which the underlying concepts of Swedish "ethos" and "tradition" influenced or shaped the national strategy to avoid forced mass lockdown during the pandemic. To prevent an enforced lockdown to control the spread of COVID-19, the Swedish government presented a range of different measures, both "voluntary and legally binding". The strategy employed by the Public Health Authority was based on notions of "individual responsibility" and "mutual trust" between the government and the citizenry. The guidelines were often ambiguous and left to individuals to interpret for themselves. © 2022 Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais
Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Movimiento indígena, ecologías y contrahegemonía en Nayarit (México) Título da Página Eletrónica: Arquivo.pt Transgressão e limites: intercetar as alternativas de género na vida social Título da Página Eletrónica: Portal da Oferta Formativa O urbano nas margens do campo: por uma sociologia dos espaços e vidas residuais
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1