规范与创造:康德的品味判断

Gianluigi Dallarda
{"title":"规范与创造:康德的品味判断","authors":"Gianluigi Dallarda","doi":"10.13130/2240-9599/8698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates some of the main problems concerning the normativity of aesthetic judgments in Kant’s  Critique of Judgment . Kant’s attempt to provide a transcendental foundation to aesthetic judgments clashes with the impossibility to find a determined conceptual rule under which they could be subsumed. This paper aims to discuss and clarify the set of problems derived from this attempt, focusing especially on the artistic perspective. In order to do that, it will be necessary to deal with the following notions: eautonomy,  sensus communis aestheticus  and genius. From this analysis it will emerge the importance of exemplarity as concept that allow us to highlight some implicit and usually neglected aspects of Kant’s aesthetic theory.","PeriodicalId":53793,"journal":{"name":"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normatività e creazione: i giudizi di gusto in Kant\",\"authors\":\"Gianluigi Dallarda\",\"doi\":\"10.13130/2240-9599/8698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates some of the main problems concerning the normativity of aesthetic judgments in Kant’s  Critique of Judgment . Kant’s attempt to provide a transcendental foundation to aesthetic judgments clashes with the impossibility to find a determined conceptual rule under which they could be subsumed. This paper aims to discuss and clarify the set of problems derived from this attempt, focusing especially on the artistic perspective. In order to do that, it will be necessary to deal with the following notions: eautonomy,  sensus communis aestheticus  and genius. From this analysis it will emerge the importance of exemplarity as concept that allow us to highlight some implicit and usually neglected aspects of Kant’s aesthetic theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/8698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/8698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了康德《判断批判》中有关审美判断规范性的一些主要问题。康德试图为美学判断提供先验基础,但却不可能找到一个确定的概念规则,将其纳入其中。本文旨在讨论和澄清这一尝试所引发的一系列问题,特别是从艺术的角度。为了做到这一点,有必要处理以下概念:美、共感、美和天才。从这一分析中,我们将看到例证性作为一个概念的重要性,它使我们能够突出康德美学理论中一些隐含的、通常被忽视的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Normatività e creazione: i giudizi di gusto in Kant
This paper investigates some of the main problems concerning the normativity of aesthetic judgments in Kant’s  Critique of Judgment . Kant’s attempt to provide a transcendental foundation to aesthetic judgments clashes with the impossibility to find a determined conceptual rule under which they could be subsumed. This paper aims to discuss and clarify the set of problems derived from this attempt, focusing especially on the artistic perspective. In order to do that, it will be necessary to deal with the following notions: eautonomy,  sensus communis aestheticus  and genius. From this analysis it will emerge the importance of exemplarity as concept that allow us to highlight some implicit and usually neglected aspects of Kant’s aesthetic theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Desublimare il sublime kantiano? Alcune considerazioni a partire da Lyotard e Deleuze lettori dell'Analitica del sublime La bellezza nella sparizione Mostri e mirabilia naturae da Francis Bacon a Athanasius Kircher Barbara Wolf-Christian Julmi, Die Macht der Atmosphären Teoria dell'errore in Kant, tra Sogni di un visionario e Critica della ragion pura
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1