跨国教学实践与课程设置

IF 0.1 4区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Forum Italicum Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1177/00145858231172187
Liz Wren-Owens
{"title":"跨国教学实践与课程设置","authors":"Liz Wren-Owens","doi":"10.1177/00145858231172187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2016 it was considered a radical change to propose a curriculum review which put the transnational at the centre of what we teach. Today, ‘transnational’ is a common descriptor in module titles across Modern Languages in the UK. The transnational has facilitated new approaches to the discipline that put migration, mobility, translation, and the legacies of empire at the heart of what we do. It has encouraged teachers and learners to think about the way that cultures and communities have been shaped by their interactions with others, and about the power dynamics inherent in these exchanges. At its best, the transnational is a powerful tool for interrogating not only what we learn and teach but also how we situate ourselves and how we create and disseminate knowledge. However, in practice it can be more complex to achieve these ideals, and embedding the transnational in teaching runs the risk of dilution and vagueness. My reflections in this article come from three interlinked perspectives: institutional, disciplinary, and as a citizen of a devolved nation. At institutional level, I led a curriculum review in the School of Modern Languages at Cardiff University in the UK in 2016. As Director of Learning and Teaching, I spearheaded a wholesale re-thinking of every module in every language programme. One of the key goals was to embed transnational thinking and practices into compulsory ‘culture’ options in year 1 and 2, in line with the ethos of the ‘Transnationalising Modern Languages’ (TML) project, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). The second perspective comes from my experience of organising and attending symposia and workshops on transnationalising (and decolonising) the curriculum through work with the University Council of Modern Languages (UCML), the Institute for Modern Languages Research (IMLR), and the AHRC Creative Multilingualism project. The final perspective comes from my situated experience as a white Welsh academic working in a Welsh institution in a UK context. Many of the debates in the sector in the UK quite naturally focus on the English context, given the relative sizes of England and Wales. However the landscape in Wales, while informed by this broader UK framework, is also shaped by the different transnational and (de)colonial histories of Wales, and by the politics of the current devolved government. Compared to the UK government in Westminster, the Welsh government has a more","PeriodicalId":12355,"journal":{"name":"Forum Italicum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transnational teaching practice and the curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Liz Wren-Owens\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00145858231172187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2016 it was considered a radical change to propose a curriculum review which put the transnational at the centre of what we teach. Today, ‘transnational’ is a common descriptor in module titles across Modern Languages in the UK. The transnational has facilitated new approaches to the discipline that put migration, mobility, translation, and the legacies of empire at the heart of what we do. It has encouraged teachers and learners to think about the way that cultures and communities have been shaped by their interactions with others, and about the power dynamics inherent in these exchanges. At its best, the transnational is a powerful tool for interrogating not only what we learn and teach but also how we situate ourselves and how we create and disseminate knowledge. However, in practice it can be more complex to achieve these ideals, and embedding the transnational in teaching runs the risk of dilution and vagueness. My reflections in this article come from three interlinked perspectives: institutional, disciplinary, and as a citizen of a devolved nation. At institutional level, I led a curriculum review in the School of Modern Languages at Cardiff University in the UK in 2016. As Director of Learning and Teaching, I spearheaded a wholesale re-thinking of every module in every language programme. One of the key goals was to embed transnational thinking and practices into compulsory ‘culture’ options in year 1 and 2, in line with the ethos of the ‘Transnationalising Modern Languages’ (TML) project, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). The second perspective comes from my experience of organising and attending symposia and workshops on transnationalising (and decolonising) the curriculum through work with the University Council of Modern Languages (UCML), the Institute for Modern Languages Research (IMLR), and the AHRC Creative Multilingualism project. The final perspective comes from my situated experience as a white Welsh academic working in a Welsh institution in a UK context. Many of the debates in the sector in the UK quite naturally focus on the English context, given the relative sizes of England and Wales. However the landscape in Wales, while informed by this broader UK framework, is also shaped by the different transnational and (de)colonial histories of Wales, and by the politics of the current devolved government. Compared to the UK government in Westminster, the Welsh government has a more\",\"PeriodicalId\":12355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forum Italicum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forum Italicum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00145858231172187\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Italicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00145858231172187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年,提出了一项课程审查,将跨国教育置于我们教学的中心,这被认为是一项根本性的变革。如今,“跨国”在英国现代语言的模块标题中是一个常见的描述词。跨国为将移民、流动、翻译和帝国遗产置于我们工作核心的学科提供了新的方法。它鼓励教师和学习者思考他们与他人的互动如何塑造文化和社区,以及这些交流中固有的权力动态。在最好的情况下,跨国是一个强大的工具,不仅可以询问我们所学和所教,还可以询问我们如何定位自己,以及我们如何创造和传播知识。然而,在实践中,实现这些理想可能会更加复杂,在教学中嵌入跨国性存在淡化和模糊的风险。我在这篇文章中的思考来自三个相互关联的角度:制度、纪律和作为一个权力下放国家的公民。在机构层面,2016年,我在英国卡迪夫大学现代语言学院领导了一次课程审查。作为学习和教学总监,我带头对每一门语言课程的每一个模块进行了全面的重新思考。其中一个关键目标是根据由艺术与人文研究委员会(AHRC)资助的“现代语言跨国化”(TML)项目的精神,在第一年和第二年将跨国思维和实践纳入强制性的“文化”选项。第二个观点来自我通过与现代语言大学理事会(UCML)、现代语言研究所(IMLR)和AHRC创造性多语项目合作,组织和参加关于课程跨国化(和非殖民化)的研讨会和研讨会的经历。最后一个观点来自于我作为一名白人威尔士学者在英国的威尔士机构工作的经历。考虑到英格兰和威尔士的相对规模,英国该行业的许多辩论很自然地集中在英语背景上。然而,威尔士的景观虽然受到英国这一更广泛框架的影响,但也受到威尔士不同的跨国和(去)殖民历史以及当前权力下放政府的政治的影响。与威斯敏斯特的英国政府相比,威尔士政府拥有更多
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transnational teaching practice and the curriculum
In 2016 it was considered a radical change to propose a curriculum review which put the transnational at the centre of what we teach. Today, ‘transnational’ is a common descriptor in module titles across Modern Languages in the UK. The transnational has facilitated new approaches to the discipline that put migration, mobility, translation, and the legacies of empire at the heart of what we do. It has encouraged teachers and learners to think about the way that cultures and communities have been shaped by their interactions with others, and about the power dynamics inherent in these exchanges. At its best, the transnational is a powerful tool for interrogating not only what we learn and teach but also how we situate ourselves and how we create and disseminate knowledge. However, in practice it can be more complex to achieve these ideals, and embedding the transnational in teaching runs the risk of dilution and vagueness. My reflections in this article come from three interlinked perspectives: institutional, disciplinary, and as a citizen of a devolved nation. At institutional level, I led a curriculum review in the School of Modern Languages at Cardiff University in the UK in 2016. As Director of Learning and Teaching, I spearheaded a wholesale re-thinking of every module in every language programme. One of the key goals was to embed transnational thinking and practices into compulsory ‘culture’ options in year 1 and 2, in line with the ethos of the ‘Transnationalising Modern Languages’ (TML) project, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). The second perspective comes from my experience of organising and attending symposia and workshops on transnationalising (and decolonising) the curriculum through work with the University Council of Modern Languages (UCML), the Institute for Modern Languages Research (IMLR), and the AHRC Creative Multilingualism project. The final perspective comes from my situated experience as a white Welsh academic working in a Welsh institution in a UK context. Many of the debates in the sector in the UK quite naturally focus on the English context, given the relative sizes of England and Wales. However the landscape in Wales, while informed by this broader UK framework, is also shaped by the different transnational and (de)colonial histories of Wales, and by the politics of the current devolved government. Compared to the UK government in Westminster, the Welsh government has a more
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forum Italicum
Forum Italicum Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Levi, Bradbury e l’Ecclesiaste. Intertestualità e interdiscorsività in Trattamento di quiescenza Book review: La nott’e’l giorno. L’opera poetica by Patrizia Vicinelli Political and cultural changes as an effect of the pestilences and pandemics through the centuries: Case studies La letteratura nella didattica dell’italiano a stranieri: l’eredità di Leonardo Sciascia Book Review: Edizione nazionale degli scritti di Antonio Gramsci. Scritti (1910–1926). V. 3, 1918 by Antonio Gramsci
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1