国家海洋保护区捕获了加利福尼亚当前生态系统鸟类的丰富和多样性

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Marine Systems Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2023.103887
Tamara M. Russell , Angela R. Szesciorka , Trevor W. Joyce , David G. Ainley , Lisa T. Ballance
{"title":"国家海洋保护区捕获了加利福尼亚当前生态系统鸟类的丰富和多样性","authors":"Tamara M. Russell ,&nbsp;Angela R. Szesciorka ,&nbsp;Trevor W. Joyce ,&nbsp;David G. Ainley ,&nbsp;Lisa T. Ballance","doi":"10.1016/j.jmarsys.2023.103887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantifying the spatial patterns of marine predators, such as seabirds, reveals areas of ecological importance and associated food web characteristics, upon which marine conservation and management plans can be based. Owing to high productivity, the California Current Ecosystem (CCE) harbors an abundant and diverse avifauna comprised of resident and migratory species. With a goal of protecting habitats in three biogeographic regions — North, Central, and South CCE — a network of marine protected areas have been designated, including five National Marine Sanctuaries (NMS). Using an extensive at-sea survey dataset (1980 to 2017), we characterize spatial patterns of seabirds, and compare mean relative abundance, diversity, and community composition both within and outside the NMSs. We found that within the CCE, seabird abundance and diversity increase linearly from south to north (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.54 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55, respectively) and decrease linearly with distance from the coast (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.16 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.23, respectively). The avifauna of the North and South regions are the most distinct, with the Central region being transitional between the two. The CCE avifauna shows limited overall diversity, with just 10 species contributing &gt;93% of abundance totals. In addition, certain foraging guilds and prey preference groups were dominant: pursuit-feeding and piscivorous species in the North and surface feeding generalists in the South. Overall, seabird relative abundance and diversity are higher within NMS boundaries compared to outside. Although relative abundance and diversity of seabirds within NMSs were broadly representative of corresponding biogeographic regions, the overall NMS network captures a range of distinct seabird communities. The analysis of this extensive dataset provides a better understanding of seabird spatial patterns and their ecological roles within different regions, thus facilitating more effective, adaptive management of CCE biotic resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Marine Sanctuaries capture enhanced abundance and diversity of the California Current Ecosystem avifauna\",\"authors\":\"Tamara M. Russell ,&nbsp;Angela R. Szesciorka ,&nbsp;Trevor W. Joyce ,&nbsp;David G. Ainley ,&nbsp;Lisa T. Ballance\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmarsys.2023.103887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Quantifying the spatial patterns of marine predators, such as seabirds, reveals areas of ecological importance and associated food web characteristics, upon which marine conservation and management plans can be based. Owing to high productivity, the California Current Ecosystem (CCE) harbors an abundant and diverse avifauna comprised of resident and migratory species. With a goal of protecting habitats in three biogeographic regions — North, Central, and South CCE — a network of marine protected areas have been designated, including five National Marine Sanctuaries (NMS). Using an extensive at-sea survey dataset (1980 to 2017), we characterize spatial patterns of seabirds, and compare mean relative abundance, diversity, and community composition both within and outside the NMSs. We found that within the CCE, seabird abundance and diversity increase linearly from south to north (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.54 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55, respectively) and decrease linearly with distance from the coast (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.16 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.23, respectively). The avifauna of the North and South regions are the most distinct, with the Central region being transitional between the two. The CCE avifauna shows limited overall diversity, with just 10 species contributing &gt;93% of abundance totals. In addition, certain foraging guilds and prey preference groups were dominant: pursuit-feeding and piscivorous species in the North and surface feeding generalists in the South. Overall, seabird relative abundance and diversity are higher within NMS boundaries compared to outside. Although relative abundance and diversity of seabirds within NMSs were broadly representative of corresponding biogeographic regions, the overall NMS network captures a range of distinct seabird communities. The analysis of this extensive dataset provides a better understanding of seabird spatial patterns and their ecological roles within different regions, thus facilitating more effective, adaptive management of CCE biotic resources.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marine Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marine Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924796323000313\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924796323000313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

量化海鸟等海洋捕食者的空间模式,揭示了具有生态重要性的区域和相关的食物网特征,海洋保护和管理计划可以以此为基础。由于生产力高,加州洋流生态系统(CCE)拥有丰富多样的鸟类,包括常驻物种和迁徙物种。为了保护CCE北部、中部和南部三个生物地理区域的栖息地,已经指定了一个海洋保护区网络,包括五个国家海洋保护区(NMS)。使用广泛的海上调查数据集(1980年至2017年),我们描述了海鸟的空间模式,并比较了NMS内外的平均相对丰度、多样性和群落组成。我们发现,在CCE内,海鸟的丰度和多样性从南到北呈线性增加(R2=0.54和R2=0.55),并随着距离海岸的距离呈线性减少(R2=0.16和R2=0.23)。北部和南部地区的鸟类区系最为独特,中部地区介于两者之间。CCE鸟类显示出有限的整体多样性,只有10个物种贡献>;丰度总量的93%。此外,某些觅食群体和猎物偏好群体占主导地位:北方的捕食性和食豆性物种,南方的表食性多面手。总体而言,与外部相比,NMS边界内的海鸟相对丰度和多样性更高。尽管NMS内海鸟的相对丰度和多样性广泛代表了相应的生物地理区域,但整个NMS网络捕捉到了一系列不同的海鸟群落。对这一广泛数据集的分析可以更好地了解海鸟的空间模式及其在不同地区的生态作用,从而促进对CCE生物资源的更有效、适应性管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
National Marine Sanctuaries capture enhanced abundance and diversity of the California Current Ecosystem avifauna

Quantifying the spatial patterns of marine predators, such as seabirds, reveals areas of ecological importance and associated food web characteristics, upon which marine conservation and management plans can be based. Owing to high productivity, the California Current Ecosystem (CCE) harbors an abundant and diverse avifauna comprised of resident and migratory species. With a goal of protecting habitats in three biogeographic regions — North, Central, and South CCE — a network of marine protected areas have been designated, including five National Marine Sanctuaries (NMS). Using an extensive at-sea survey dataset (1980 to 2017), we characterize spatial patterns of seabirds, and compare mean relative abundance, diversity, and community composition both within and outside the NMSs. We found that within the CCE, seabird abundance and diversity increase linearly from south to north (R2 = 0.54 and R2 = 0.55, respectively) and decrease linearly with distance from the coast (R2 = 0.16 and R2 = 0.23, respectively). The avifauna of the North and South regions are the most distinct, with the Central region being transitional between the two. The CCE avifauna shows limited overall diversity, with just 10 species contributing >93% of abundance totals. In addition, certain foraging guilds and prey preference groups were dominant: pursuit-feeding and piscivorous species in the North and surface feeding generalists in the South. Overall, seabird relative abundance and diversity are higher within NMS boundaries compared to outside. Although relative abundance and diversity of seabirds within NMSs were broadly representative of corresponding biogeographic regions, the overall NMS network captures a range of distinct seabird communities. The analysis of this extensive dataset provides a better understanding of seabird spatial patterns and their ecological roles within different regions, thus facilitating more effective, adaptive management of CCE biotic resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Systems
Journal of Marine Systems 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Marine Systems provides a medium for interdisciplinary exchange between physical, chemical and biological oceanographers and marine geologists. The journal welcomes original research papers and review articles. Preference will be given to interdisciplinary approaches to marine systems.
期刊最新文献
Climate drivers of phytoplankton production along the Chilean coast A multidecadal study of the Malabar upwelling system influencing Indian Mackerel landings along the coasts of Karnataka and Kerala, south-east Arabian Sea Coexistence of a native and an invasive mussel species across an environmental gradient: Do interactions matter? Potential bottom-up and top-down control of large microzooplankton in response to contrasting productive scenarios in the tropical southwestern Atlantic Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1