尼泊尔加德满都肉类加工者的肉类细菌质量和卫生实践

B. Saud, Neetu Amatya, Rajkishor Yadav, G. Paudel, S. Adhikari, V. Shrestha, A. Lakhey
{"title":"尼泊尔加德满都肉类加工者的肉类细菌质量和卫生实践","authors":"B. Saud, Neetu Amatya, Rajkishor Yadav, G. Paudel, S. Adhikari, V. Shrestha, A. Lakhey","doi":"10.18502/jfsh.v9i2.13424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated bacterial growth from raw meats and items used during meat handling, and hygiene practices followed by meat handlers at butcher shops in Kathmandu. A cross-sectional study was conducted; a total of 200 swab samples were collected from 121 butcher shops. A mean bacterial count was performed, and bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility test were performed. A face-to-face interview was conducted to evaluate the hygiene practices. Out of 200 samples, 90.5% showed bacterial growth. All Buffalo meat samples and more than 90.0% of Goat and Pork meat samples showed bacterial growth, and only 60.0% of knife swabs showed bacterial growth. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant isolate followed by Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Citrobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., and Proteus spp. Mean bacterial count in Buffalo meat (6.43 log cfu/cm2 ) was the highest followed by Pork meat (5.26 log cfu/cm2 ) and Goat meat (5.04 log cfu/cm2 ). A total of 456 bacteria were isolated, of which 24.3% were multi-drug resistant. Out of 136 S. aureus isolated, 10.2% were Methicillin Resistant S. aureus. A statistically significant difference was noted in carcass handling during hand injury, before and after knives and chopping block cleaning, use of fly and rodent controllers, and clean water supply. Hygiene practices depicted a significant relation with the mean bacterial count, whilst no significant relation with hand hygiene practice after the use of restrooms and use of gloves. Bacterial growth in meat and butcher items is at an alarming rate in spite of having good hygiene practices and nearly a quarter of isolates are multi-drug resistant.","PeriodicalId":91000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food safety and hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacteriological quality of meat and hygiene practice among meat handlers in Kathmandu, Nepal\",\"authors\":\"B. Saud, Neetu Amatya, Rajkishor Yadav, G. Paudel, S. Adhikari, V. Shrestha, A. Lakhey\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jfsh.v9i2.13424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigated bacterial growth from raw meats and items used during meat handling, and hygiene practices followed by meat handlers at butcher shops in Kathmandu. A cross-sectional study was conducted; a total of 200 swab samples were collected from 121 butcher shops. A mean bacterial count was performed, and bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility test were performed. A face-to-face interview was conducted to evaluate the hygiene practices. Out of 200 samples, 90.5% showed bacterial growth. All Buffalo meat samples and more than 90.0% of Goat and Pork meat samples showed bacterial growth, and only 60.0% of knife swabs showed bacterial growth. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant isolate followed by Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Citrobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., and Proteus spp. Mean bacterial count in Buffalo meat (6.43 log cfu/cm2 ) was the highest followed by Pork meat (5.26 log cfu/cm2 ) and Goat meat (5.04 log cfu/cm2 ). A total of 456 bacteria were isolated, of which 24.3% were multi-drug resistant. Out of 136 S. aureus isolated, 10.2% were Methicillin Resistant S. aureus. A statistically significant difference was noted in carcass handling during hand injury, before and after knives and chopping block cleaning, use of fly and rodent controllers, and clean water supply. Hygiene practices depicted a significant relation with the mean bacterial count, whilst no significant relation with hand hygiene practice after the use of restrooms and use of gloves. Bacterial growth in meat and butcher items is at an alarming rate in spite of having good hygiene practices and nearly a quarter of isolates are multi-drug resistant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food safety and hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food safety and hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh.v9i2.13424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food safety and hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh.v9i2.13424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了生肉和肉类处理过程中使用的物品的细菌生长情况,以及加德满都肉店肉类处理人员遵循的卫生习惯。进行了一项横断面研究;共从121家肉铺采集了200份拭子样本。进行平均细菌计数,并进行细菌鉴定和抗生素敏感性测试。进行了一次面对面的访谈,以评估卫生习惯。在200个样本中,90.5%的样本显示细菌生长。所有水牛肉样本和超过90.0%的山羊肉和猪肉样本显示细菌生长,只有60.0%的刀拭子显示细菌生长。金黄色葡萄球菌是主要的分离物,其次是大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌、柠檬酸杆菌、克雷伯菌和变形杆菌。水牛肉的平均细菌计数(6.43 log cfu/cm2)最高,其次是猪肉(5.26 log cfu/cm 2)和山羊肉(5.04 log cfu/cm3)。共分离到456株细菌,其中24.3%具有多重耐药性。在136株分离的金黄色葡萄球菌中,10.2%为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄菌。在手部受伤期间、刀具和砧板清洗前后、苍蝇和啮齿动物控制器的使用以及清洁水供应方面,尸体处理存在统计学显著差异。卫生实践与平均细菌计数有显著关系,而与使用洗手间和手套后的手部卫生实践没有显著关系。尽管有良好的卫生习惯,但肉类和肉品中的细菌生长速度惊人,近四分之一的分离株具有多重耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bacteriological quality of meat and hygiene practice among meat handlers in Kathmandu, Nepal
We investigated bacterial growth from raw meats and items used during meat handling, and hygiene practices followed by meat handlers at butcher shops in Kathmandu. A cross-sectional study was conducted; a total of 200 swab samples were collected from 121 butcher shops. A mean bacterial count was performed, and bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility test were performed. A face-to-face interview was conducted to evaluate the hygiene practices. Out of 200 samples, 90.5% showed bacterial growth. All Buffalo meat samples and more than 90.0% of Goat and Pork meat samples showed bacterial growth, and only 60.0% of knife swabs showed bacterial growth. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant isolate followed by Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Citrobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., and Proteus spp. Mean bacterial count in Buffalo meat (6.43 log cfu/cm2 ) was the highest followed by Pork meat (5.26 log cfu/cm2 ) and Goat meat (5.04 log cfu/cm2 ). A total of 456 bacteria were isolated, of which 24.3% were multi-drug resistant. Out of 136 S. aureus isolated, 10.2% were Methicillin Resistant S. aureus. A statistically significant difference was noted in carcass handling during hand injury, before and after knives and chopping block cleaning, use of fly and rodent controllers, and clean water supply. Hygiene practices depicted a significant relation with the mean bacterial count, whilst no significant relation with hand hygiene practice after the use of restrooms and use of gloves. Bacterial growth in meat and butcher items is at an alarming rate in spite of having good hygiene practices and nearly a quarter of isolates are multi-drug resistant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the antioxidant activity and the level of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in honey Assessment of aflatoxin levels in whole and peeled ginger marketed in Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania Bacteriological quality of street-vended beverages sold in two popular markets in Georgetown, Guyana Assessment of meat preservation methods used by retailers and the estimation of direct economic losses associated with meat spoilage in Kenya Nitrosamine in meat and meat products: a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1