脑电分析中的超频带约束:模态分解在推边界中的作用

Signals Pub Date : 2023-07-05 DOI:10.3390/signals4030026
Eduardo Arrufat-Pié, M. Estévez-Báez, José Mario Estévez-Carreras, Gerry Leisman, C. Machado, Carlos Beltrán-León
{"title":"脑电分析中的超频带约束:模态分解在推边界中的作用","authors":"Eduardo Arrufat-Pié, M. Estévez-Báez, José Mario Estévez-Carreras, Gerry Leisman, C. Machado, Carlos Beltrán-León","doi":"10.3390/signals4030026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the use of empirical mode decomposition (EMD) to extract intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) for the spectral analysis of EEG signals in healthy individuals and its possible biological interpretations. Unlike traditional EEG analysis, this approach does not require the establishment of arbitrary band limits. The study uses a multivariate EMD algorithm (APIT-MEMD) to extract IMFs from the EEG signals of 34 healthy volunteers. The first six IMFs are analyzed using two different methods, based on FFT and HHT, and the results compared using the ANOVA test and the Bland–Altman method for agreement test. The outcomes show that the frequency values of the first six IMFs fall within the range of classic EEG bands (1.72–52.4 Hz). Although there was a lack of agreement in the mean weighted frequency values of the first three IMFs between the two methods (>3 Hz), both methods showed similar results for power spectral density (<5% normalized units, %, of power spectral density). The HHT method is found to have better frequency resolution than APIT-MEMD associated with FTT that produce less overlapping between IMF3 and 4 (p = 0.0046) and it is recommended for analyzing the spectral properties of IMFs. The study concludes that the HHT method could help to avoid the assumption of strict frequency band limits, and that the potential impact of EEG physiological phenomenon on mode-mixing interpretation, particularly for the alpha and theta ranges, must be considered in future research.","PeriodicalId":93815,"journal":{"name":"Signals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Frequency Band Constraints in EEG Analysis: The Role of the Mode Decomposition in Pushing the Boundaries\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Arrufat-Pié, M. Estévez-Báez, José Mario Estévez-Carreras, Gerry Leisman, C. Machado, Carlos Beltrán-León\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/signals4030026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the use of empirical mode decomposition (EMD) to extract intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) for the spectral analysis of EEG signals in healthy individuals and its possible biological interpretations. Unlike traditional EEG analysis, this approach does not require the establishment of arbitrary band limits. The study uses a multivariate EMD algorithm (APIT-MEMD) to extract IMFs from the EEG signals of 34 healthy volunteers. The first six IMFs are analyzed using two different methods, based on FFT and HHT, and the results compared using the ANOVA test and the Bland–Altman method for agreement test. The outcomes show that the frequency values of the first six IMFs fall within the range of classic EEG bands (1.72–52.4 Hz). Although there was a lack of agreement in the mean weighted frequency values of the first three IMFs between the two methods (>3 Hz), both methods showed similar results for power spectral density (<5% normalized units, %, of power spectral density). The HHT method is found to have better frequency resolution than APIT-MEMD associated with FTT that produce less overlapping between IMF3 and 4 (p = 0.0046) and it is recommended for analyzing the spectral properties of IMFs. The study concludes that the HHT method could help to avoid the assumption of strict frequency band limits, and that the potential impact of EEG physiological phenomenon on mode-mixing interpretation, particularly for the alpha and theta ranges, must be considered in future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/signals4030026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/signals4030026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了利用经验模态分解(EMD)提取健康个体脑电图信号频谱分析的内在模态函数(IMFs)及其可能的生物学解释。与传统的脑电图分析不同,这种方法不需要建立任意的频带限制。本研究采用多元EMD算法(APIT-MEMD)从34名健康志愿者的脑电图信号中提取imf。使用FFT和HHT两种不同的方法对前六个IMFs进行分析,并使用ANOVA检验和Bland-Altman方法进行一致性检验。结果表明,前6个IMFs的频率值均在经典EEG频带(1.72 ~ 52.4 Hz)范围内。尽管两种方法(> - 3hz)的前三个imf的平均加权频率值缺乏一致性,但两种方法在功率谱密度(功率谱密度的归一化单位<5%,%)上显示出相似的结果。HHT方法比APIT-MEMD方法具有更好的频率分辨率,与FTT相关的APIT-MEMD方法在IMF3和4之间产生较少的重叠(p = 0.0046),推荐用于分析IMF3和4的频谱特性。研究认为,HHT方法可以避免假设严格的频带限制,并且在未来的研究中必须考虑脑电生理现象对模式混合解释的潜在影响,特别是对α和θ范围的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond Frequency Band Constraints in EEG Analysis: The Role of the Mode Decomposition in Pushing the Boundaries
This study investigates the use of empirical mode decomposition (EMD) to extract intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) for the spectral analysis of EEG signals in healthy individuals and its possible biological interpretations. Unlike traditional EEG analysis, this approach does not require the establishment of arbitrary band limits. The study uses a multivariate EMD algorithm (APIT-MEMD) to extract IMFs from the EEG signals of 34 healthy volunteers. The first six IMFs are analyzed using two different methods, based on FFT and HHT, and the results compared using the ANOVA test and the Bland–Altman method for agreement test. The outcomes show that the frequency values of the first six IMFs fall within the range of classic EEG bands (1.72–52.4 Hz). Although there was a lack of agreement in the mean weighted frequency values of the first three IMFs between the two methods (>3 Hz), both methods showed similar results for power spectral density (<5% normalized units, %, of power spectral density). The HHT method is found to have better frequency resolution than APIT-MEMD associated with FTT that produce less overlapping between IMF3 and 4 (p = 0.0046) and it is recommended for analyzing the spectral properties of IMFs. The study concludes that the HHT method could help to avoid the assumption of strict frequency band limits, and that the potential impact of EEG physiological phenomenon on mode-mixing interpretation, particularly for the alpha and theta ranges, must be considered in future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Detection of Movement and Lead-Popping Artifacts in Polysomnography EEG Data. Development of an Integrated System of sEMG Signal Acquisition, Processing, and Analysis with AI Techniques Correction: Martin et al. ApeTI: A Thermal Image Dataset for Face and Nose Segmentation with Apes. Signals 2024, 5, 147–164 On the Impulse Response of Singular Discrete LTI Systems and Three Fourier Transform Pairs Noncooperative Spectrum Sensing Strategy Based on Recurrence Quantification Analysis in the Context of the Cognitive Radio
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1