{"title":"利用机器学习分类算法预测具有文化智能和自我效能感的文化反应型教师角色","authors":"Kasım Karataş, Ibrahim Arpaci, Yusuf Yildirim","doi":"10.1177/00131245221087999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to predict the culturally responsive teacher roles based on cultural intelligence and self-efficacy using machine learning classification algorithms. The research group consists of 415 teachers from different branches. The Bayes classifier (NaiveBayes), logistic-regression (SMO), lazy-classifier (KStar), meta-classifier (LogitBoost), rule-learner (JRip), and decision-tree (J48) were employed in the assessment of the predictive model. The results indicated that JRip rule-learner had a better performance than other classifiers in predicting the culturally responsive teachers based on six attributes used in the study. The JRip rule-learner classified the culturally responsive teachers as low, medium, or high with an accuracy of 99.76% (CCI: 414/415) [Kappa statistic: 0.996, Mean Absolute Error (MAE): 0.003, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE): 0.043, Relative Absolute Error (RAE): 0.663, Relative Squared Error (RRSE): 9.244]. The results indicated that all classifiers had an acceptable performance but JRip rule-learner had a better performance than the other classifiers in predicting the culturally responsive teachers.","PeriodicalId":47248,"journal":{"name":"Education and Urban Society","volume":"55 1","pages":"674 - 697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the Culturally Responsive Teacher Roles With Cultural Intelligence and Self-Efficacy Using Machine Learning Classification Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Kasım Karataş, Ibrahim Arpaci, Yusuf Yildirim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00131245221087999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to predict the culturally responsive teacher roles based on cultural intelligence and self-efficacy using machine learning classification algorithms. The research group consists of 415 teachers from different branches. The Bayes classifier (NaiveBayes), logistic-regression (SMO), lazy-classifier (KStar), meta-classifier (LogitBoost), rule-learner (JRip), and decision-tree (J48) were employed in the assessment of the predictive model. The results indicated that JRip rule-learner had a better performance than other classifiers in predicting the culturally responsive teachers based on six attributes used in the study. The JRip rule-learner classified the culturally responsive teachers as low, medium, or high with an accuracy of 99.76% (CCI: 414/415) [Kappa statistic: 0.996, Mean Absolute Error (MAE): 0.003, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE): 0.043, Relative Absolute Error (RAE): 0.663, Relative Squared Error (RRSE): 9.244]. The results indicated that all classifiers had an acceptable performance but JRip rule-learner had a better performance than the other classifiers in predicting the culturally responsive teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Urban Society\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"674 - 697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Urban Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245221087999\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Urban Society","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245221087999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting the Culturally Responsive Teacher Roles With Cultural Intelligence and Self-Efficacy Using Machine Learning Classification Algorithms
This study aimed to predict the culturally responsive teacher roles based on cultural intelligence and self-efficacy using machine learning classification algorithms. The research group consists of 415 teachers from different branches. The Bayes classifier (NaiveBayes), logistic-regression (SMO), lazy-classifier (KStar), meta-classifier (LogitBoost), rule-learner (JRip), and decision-tree (J48) were employed in the assessment of the predictive model. The results indicated that JRip rule-learner had a better performance than other classifiers in predicting the culturally responsive teachers based on six attributes used in the study. The JRip rule-learner classified the culturally responsive teachers as low, medium, or high with an accuracy of 99.76% (CCI: 414/415) [Kappa statistic: 0.996, Mean Absolute Error (MAE): 0.003, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE): 0.043, Relative Absolute Error (RAE): 0.663, Relative Squared Error (RRSE): 9.244]. The results indicated that all classifiers had an acceptable performance but JRip rule-learner had a better performance than the other classifiers in predicting the culturally responsive teachers.
期刊介绍:
Education and Urban Society (EUS) is a multidisciplinary journal that examines the role of education as a social institution in an increasingly urban and multicultural society. To this end, EUS publishes articles exploring the functions of educational institutions, policies, and processes in light of national concerns for improving the environment of urban schools that seek to provide equal educational opportunities for all students. EUS welcomes articles based on practice and research with an explicit urban context or component that examine the role of education from a variety of perspectives including, but not limited to, those based on empirical analyses, action research, and ethnographic perspectives as well as those that view education from philosophical, historical, policy, and/or legal points of view.lyses.