中线切口作为标本提取部位:总是要避免吗?关于扩大脐带套管针入路使用的单中心经验。

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2020-09-25 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08384-4
E. Botteri, C. Turolo, M. Caprioli, N. Vettoretto
{"title":"中线切口作为标本提取部位:总是要避免吗?关于扩大脐带套管针入路使用的单中心经验。","authors":"E. Botteri, C. Turolo, M. Caprioli, N. Vettoretto","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08384-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By the years several locations for specimen extraction site (SES) during laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease have been proposed and many studies have focused their attention on outcomes and complications, but the 'best' SES has not yet been found. In this paper we describe our experience using the enlargement of umbilical trocar access as SES during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: at the end of the intracorporal phase we remove Hasson's trocar from the umbilicus, therefore the skin and fascial incision is enlarged up to 5-6 cm. In our work we considered 36 patients extracted from our database from 2017 with at least one year follow up. We don't report any skin closure dehiscence or surgical site infection (SSI) and in only one patient (2.7%) occurred incisional hernia (IH). The results of our study are good and an accurate wound closure at the end of the surgery and an optimal perioperative management are important to reach this goal. The enlargement of umbilical access could enable several post-operative advantages such as a fewer painful areas and a reduced number of incisions with a potential risk of SSI and incisional hernia compared to traditional SES options but further studies investigating that are needed. In the future other incisions will not be necessary except the normal trocar site ones.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midline incision as specimen extraction site: always to avoid? Single center experience about the use of enlarged umbilical trocar access.\",\"authors\":\"E. Botteri, C. Turolo, M. Caprioli, N. Vettoretto\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08384-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By the years several locations for specimen extraction site (SES) during laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease have been proposed and many studies have focused their attention on outcomes and complications, but the 'best' SES has not yet been found. In this paper we describe our experience using the enlargement of umbilical trocar access as SES during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: at the end of the intracorporal phase we remove Hasson's trocar from the umbilicus, therefore the skin and fascial incision is enlarged up to 5-6 cm. In our work we considered 36 patients extracted from our database from 2017 with at least one year follow up. We don't report any skin closure dehiscence or surgical site infection (SSI) and in only one patient (2.7%) occurred incisional hernia (IH). The results of our study are good and an accurate wound closure at the end of the surgery and an optimal perioperative management are important to reach this goal. The enlargement of umbilical access could enable several post-operative advantages such as a fewer painful areas and a reduced number of incisions with a potential risk of SSI and incisional hernia compared to traditional SES options but further studies investigating that are needed. In the future other incisions will not be necessary except the normal trocar site ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08384-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08384-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多年来,已经提出了结肠直肠癌腹腔镜手术中标本提取部位(SES)的几个位置,许多研究都将注意力集中在结果和并发症上,但尚未找到“最佳”SES。在本文中,我们描述了我们在腹腔镜结直肠手术中使用扩大脐部套管针通路作为SES的经验:在体内阶段结束时,我们从脐部取出Hasson套管针,因此皮肤和筋膜切口扩大到5-6厘米。在我们的工作中,我们考虑了从2017年的数据库中提取的36名患者,并进行了至少一年的随访。我们没有报告任何皮肤闭合处裂开或手术部位感染(SSI),只有一名患者(2.7%)发生切口疝(IH)。我们的研究结果是好的,手术结束时准确的伤口闭合和最佳的围手术期管理对实现这一目标很重要。与传统的SES方案相比,扩大脐带通道可以带来一些术后优势,如更少的疼痛区域和更少的切口数量,具有SSI和切口疝的潜在风险,但还需要进一步研究。在未来,除了正常的套管针部位外,其他切口将不必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Midline incision as specimen extraction site: always to avoid? Single center experience about the use of enlarged umbilical trocar access.
By the years several locations for specimen extraction site (SES) during laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease have been proposed and many studies have focused their attention on outcomes and complications, but the 'best' SES has not yet been found. In this paper we describe our experience using the enlargement of umbilical trocar access as SES during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: at the end of the intracorporal phase we remove Hasson's trocar from the umbilicus, therefore the skin and fascial incision is enlarged up to 5-6 cm. In our work we considered 36 patients extracted from our database from 2017 with at least one year follow up. We don't report any skin closure dehiscence or surgical site infection (SSI) and in only one patient (2.7%) occurred incisional hernia (IH). The results of our study are good and an accurate wound closure at the end of the surgery and an optimal perioperative management are important to reach this goal. The enlargement of umbilical access could enable several post-operative advantages such as a fewer painful areas and a reduced number of incisions with a potential risk of SSI and incisional hernia compared to traditional SES options but further studies investigating that are needed. In the future other incisions will not be necessary except the normal trocar site ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid. Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with end-stage alcohol-related liver disease and severe acute alcohol-related hepatitis: a concise review. Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results. Management of intra- and post-operative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1