不同肥胖参数对肥胖者胰岛素抵抗的意义

Ban Ali, Ismail Hussein, Ali Almaliky
{"title":"不同肥胖参数对肥胖者胰岛素抵抗的意义","authors":"Ban Ali, Ismail Hussein, Ali Almaliky","doi":"10.4103/mj.mj_19_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies found a link between visceral obesity and insulin resistance (IR). Numerous attempts made to discover a link between fat lipotoxicity and IR by measuring waist circumference (WC) or body mass index (BMI). This study investigates the relationship between body adiposity index [BAI], a body shape index [ABSI], BMI, waist-to-hip ratio [WHR], TGI-WC = Triglyceride glucose index-× WC, and TGI-BMI = Triglyceride glucose index-BMI. Homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) is utilized to examine the significance of those indices in the target population with obesity-linked IR in Iraq. Objective: The aim is to identify the most relevant obesity index by examining the relationship between multiple obesity indices and IR in obese healthy individuals. Design and Methods: 100 obese and nonobese patients' height, weight, and hip circumference were taken. Triglycerides (TGs), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum insulin, and fasting plasma glucose were obtained to calculate HOMA-IR, TGI-WC, and TGI-BMI. Results: Healthy adults 18–50 years were divided (obese and not-obese), clinical features were averaged, and standard errors of the mean calculated. Results for the first obese group were blood pressure [BP] = 114 ± 2/75 ± 9, HbA1c=5.76 ± 0.09, TG = 175.26 ± 3.66, fasting blood glucose [FBG] = 111.84 ± 1.57, WC = 106.62 ± 1.68, BMI = 32.02 ± 0.69, while those for the second group were BP = 111 ± 8/70 ± 6, HbA1c = 4.41 ± 0.06, TG = 96.36 ± 2.02, FBG = 82.40 ± 1.48, WC = 83.76 ± 0.85, and BMI = 22.84 ± 0.22. The relationships between obesity indices were analyzed with HOMA-IR being judged to be IR when it acquired a score value of ≥ 2. The Pearson's correlation coefficient® used to represent was WHR: r = 0.58, P = 0.0001, ABSI: r = 0.44, P = 0.04, BAI: r = 0.50, P = 0.02, TGI-WC: r = 0.89, P = 0.0001, and TGI-BMI: r = 0.74, P = 0.74. Conclusion: All of the obesity and lipid-related indices investigated were positively correlated with IR. The use of TGI-WC is recommended since it is straightforward to calculate using accessible laboratory tests; it showed the highest (Pearson's) coefficient (r = 0.89; P = 0.0001).","PeriodicalId":33069,"journal":{"name":"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The significance of different obesity parameters in obese participants with insulin resistance\",\"authors\":\"Ban Ali, Ismail Hussein, Ali Almaliky\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/mj.mj_19_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Studies found a link between visceral obesity and insulin resistance (IR). Numerous attempts made to discover a link between fat lipotoxicity and IR by measuring waist circumference (WC) or body mass index (BMI). This study investigates the relationship between body adiposity index [BAI], a body shape index [ABSI], BMI, waist-to-hip ratio [WHR], TGI-WC = Triglyceride glucose index-× WC, and TGI-BMI = Triglyceride glucose index-BMI. Homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) is utilized to examine the significance of those indices in the target population with obesity-linked IR in Iraq. Objective: The aim is to identify the most relevant obesity index by examining the relationship between multiple obesity indices and IR in obese healthy individuals. Design and Methods: 100 obese and nonobese patients' height, weight, and hip circumference were taken. Triglycerides (TGs), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum insulin, and fasting plasma glucose were obtained to calculate HOMA-IR, TGI-WC, and TGI-BMI. Results: Healthy adults 18–50 years were divided (obese and not-obese), clinical features were averaged, and standard errors of the mean calculated. Results for the first obese group were blood pressure [BP] = 114 ± 2/75 ± 9, HbA1c=5.76 ± 0.09, TG = 175.26 ± 3.66, fasting blood glucose [FBG] = 111.84 ± 1.57, WC = 106.62 ± 1.68, BMI = 32.02 ± 0.69, while those for the second group were BP = 111 ± 8/70 ± 6, HbA1c = 4.41 ± 0.06, TG = 96.36 ± 2.02, FBG = 82.40 ± 1.48, WC = 83.76 ± 0.85, and BMI = 22.84 ± 0.22. The relationships between obesity indices were analyzed with HOMA-IR being judged to be IR when it acquired a score value of ≥ 2. The Pearson's correlation coefficient® used to represent was WHR: r = 0.58, P = 0.0001, ABSI: r = 0.44, P = 0.04, BAI: r = 0.50, P = 0.02, TGI-WC: r = 0.89, P = 0.0001, and TGI-BMI: r = 0.74, P = 0.74. Conclusion: All of the obesity and lipid-related indices investigated were positively correlated with IR. The use of TGI-WC is recommended since it is straightforward to calculate using accessible laboratory tests; it showed the highest (Pearson's) coefficient (r = 0.89; P = 0.0001).\",\"PeriodicalId\":33069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/mj.mj_19_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mjl@ lmstnSry@ lTby@","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mj.mj_19_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究发现内脏肥胖与胰岛素抵抗(IR)之间存在联系。许多人试图通过测量腰围(WC)或体重指数(BMI)来发现脂肪毒性和IR之间的联系。本研究探讨体脂指数[BAI]、体型指数[ABSI]、BMI、腰臀比[WHR]、TGI-WC =甘油三酯葡萄糖指数-× WC、TGI-BMI =甘油三酯葡萄糖指数-BMI之间的关系。利用IR的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)来检查这些指标在伊拉克肥胖相关IR目标人群中的意义。目的:通过研究肥胖健康人多种肥胖指标与IR的关系,找出最相关的肥胖指标。设计与方法:测定100例肥胖和非肥胖患者的身高、体重和臀围。获取甘油三酯(tg)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血清胰岛素和空腹血糖,计算HOMA-IR、TGI-WC和TGI-BMI。结果:将18-50岁的健康成人分为肥胖和非肥胖两组,取临床特征平均值,计算平均值的标准误差。结果第一肥胖组血压(BP) = 114±2/75±9,糖化血红蛋白= 5.76±0.09,TG = 175.26±3.66,空腹血糖(FBG) = 111.84±1.57,WC = 106.62±1.68,体重指数= 32.02±0.69,而第二组BP = 111±8/70±6,糖化血红蛋白= 4.41±0.06,TG = 96.36±2.02,光纤光栅= 82.40±1.48,WC = 83.76±0.85,体重指数= 22.84±0.22。分析肥胖指标之间的关系,当HOMA-IR得分≥2时判断为IR。Pearson相关系数®分别为:WHR: r = 0.58, P = 0.0001, ABSI: r = 0.44, P = 0.04, BAI: r = 0.50, P = 0.02, TGI-WC: r = 0.89, P = 0.0001, TGI-BMI: r = 0.74, P = 0.74。结论:肥胖及血脂相关指标均与IR呈正相关。建议使用TGI-WC,因为使用易于获得的实验室测试可以直接计算;Pearson’s系数最高(r = 0.89);P = 0.0001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The significance of different obesity parameters in obese participants with insulin resistance
Background: Studies found a link between visceral obesity and insulin resistance (IR). Numerous attempts made to discover a link between fat lipotoxicity and IR by measuring waist circumference (WC) or body mass index (BMI). This study investigates the relationship between body adiposity index [BAI], a body shape index [ABSI], BMI, waist-to-hip ratio [WHR], TGI-WC = Triglyceride glucose index-× WC, and TGI-BMI = Triglyceride glucose index-BMI. Homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) is utilized to examine the significance of those indices in the target population with obesity-linked IR in Iraq. Objective: The aim is to identify the most relevant obesity index by examining the relationship between multiple obesity indices and IR in obese healthy individuals. Design and Methods: 100 obese and nonobese patients' height, weight, and hip circumference were taken. Triglycerides (TGs), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum insulin, and fasting plasma glucose were obtained to calculate HOMA-IR, TGI-WC, and TGI-BMI. Results: Healthy adults 18–50 years were divided (obese and not-obese), clinical features were averaged, and standard errors of the mean calculated. Results for the first obese group were blood pressure [BP] = 114 ± 2/75 ± 9, HbA1c=5.76 ± 0.09, TG = 175.26 ± 3.66, fasting blood glucose [FBG] = 111.84 ± 1.57, WC = 106.62 ± 1.68, BMI = 32.02 ± 0.69, while those for the second group were BP = 111 ± 8/70 ± 6, HbA1c = 4.41 ± 0.06, TG = 96.36 ± 2.02, FBG = 82.40 ± 1.48, WC = 83.76 ± 0.85, and BMI = 22.84 ± 0.22. The relationships between obesity indices were analyzed with HOMA-IR being judged to be IR when it acquired a score value of ≥ 2. The Pearson's correlation coefficient® used to represent was WHR: r = 0.58, P = 0.0001, ABSI: r = 0.44, P = 0.04, BAI: r = 0.50, P = 0.02, TGI-WC: r = 0.89, P = 0.0001, and TGI-BMI: r = 0.74, P = 0.74. Conclusion: All of the obesity and lipid-related indices investigated were positively correlated with IR. The use of TGI-WC is recommended since it is straightforward to calculate using accessible laboratory tests; it showed the highest (Pearson's) coefficient (r = 0.89; P = 0.0001).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of activity of xanthine oxidase on some biomarkers in patients with kidney stones in Iraqi Patients Blood lead level and renal function: Sample of Iraqi patients attending Baghdad Teaching Hospital in 2022 Morphometric measurements of carrying angle of the elbow among sample of Iraqi medical students: An observational, cross-sectional study Dimensions of the sphenoid and ethmoid sinuses on computed tomography: Clinical implications and role in sex determination Study of the link between ligament laxity and the occurrence of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1