启用限制

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Osiris Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1086/713762
M. Maxera
{"title":"启用限制","authors":"M. Maxera","doi":"10.1086/713762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Costa Rica today, where the use of contraceptives is widespread, the most popular method is female sterilization. Notably, Costa Rica’s high rates of this surgery were attained in the context of a very restrictive legal framework for the provision of sterilization. Until 1999, when a presidential decree explicitly regulated and permitted sterilization for contraceptive purposes, only therapeutic sterilization was legally allowed (i.e., to prevent a woman who had a serious health condition from becoming pregnant). Between 1970 and 1999, successive governments and state judicial bodies were unwilling to resolve the legal status of voluntary contraceptive sterilization. Government bureaucracies and different judicial branches repeatedly bounced the legal problem back to physicians to resolve. In the uncomfortable position of having to respond to an increasing demand for the surgery, specialist physicians responsible for sterilization, and their professional association, created a regulatory legal framework that ostensibly restricted the practice while actually enabling it. The provisions established by the professional association dictated access to sterilization in the country for over two decades, and were acknowledged not only by the population but also by state institutions, including those charged with surveying and protecting legality. A kind of judicial surrogacy was created in Costa Rica, though this surrogate role was not one Costa Rican physicians ever wanted, or felt comfortable playing.","PeriodicalId":54659,"journal":{"name":"Osiris","volume":"36 1","pages":"181 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/713762","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enabling Restrictions\",\"authors\":\"M. Maxera\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/713762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Costa Rica today, where the use of contraceptives is widespread, the most popular method is female sterilization. Notably, Costa Rica’s high rates of this surgery were attained in the context of a very restrictive legal framework for the provision of sterilization. Until 1999, when a presidential decree explicitly regulated and permitted sterilization for contraceptive purposes, only therapeutic sterilization was legally allowed (i.e., to prevent a woman who had a serious health condition from becoming pregnant). Between 1970 and 1999, successive governments and state judicial bodies were unwilling to resolve the legal status of voluntary contraceptive sterilization. Government bureaucracies and different judicial branches repeatedly bounced the legal problem back to physicians to resolve. In the uncomfortable position of having to respond to an increasing demand for the surgery, specialist physicians responsible for sterilization, and their professional association, created a regulatory legal framework that ostensibly restricted the practice while actually enabling it. The provisions established by the professional association dictated access to sterilization in the country for over two decades, and were acknowledged not only by the population but also by state institutions, including those charged with surveying and protecting legality. A kind of judicial surrogacy was created in Costa Rica, though this surrogate role was not one Costa Rican physicians ever wanted, or felt comfortable playing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osiris\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/713762\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osiris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/713762\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osiris","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/713762","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在今天的哥斯达黎加,避孕药具的使用是广泛的,最流行的方法是女性绝育。值得注意的是,哥斯达黎加这种手术的高比率是在提供绝育手术的法律框架非常严格的情况下实现的。在1999年总统令明确规定并允许出于避孕目的的绝育之前,法律只允许治疗性绝育(即防止有严重健康状况的妇女怀孕)。1970年至1999年间,历届政府和国家司法机构都不愿解决自愿避孕绝育的法律地位问题。政府官僚机构和不同的司法部门一再将法律问题退回给医生解决。由于不得不应对日益增长的手术需求,负责绝育的专科医生和他们的专业协会创造了一个监管法律框架,表面上限制了这种做法,实际上却使其得以实施。专业协会制定的规定规定了二十多年来在国内可以进行绝育手术,这不仅得到了人民的承认,而且得到了国家机构的承认,包括那些负责调查和保护合法性的机构。哥斯达黎加创造了一种司法代理,尽管这种代理角色不是哥斯达黎加医生想要的,也不是他们觉得适合扮演的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enabling Restrictions
In Costa Rica today, where the use of contraceptives is widespread, the most popular method is female sterilization. Notably, Costa Rica’s high rates of this surgery were attained in the context of a very restrictive legal framework for the provision of sterilization. Until 1999, when a presidential decree explicitly regulated and permitted sterilization for contraceptive purposes, only therapeutic sterilization was legally allowed (i.e., to prevent a woman who had a serious health condition from becoming pregnant). Between 1970 and 1999, successive governments and state judicial bodies were unwilling to resolve the legal status of voluntary contraceptive sterilization. Government bureaucracies and different judicial branches repeatedly bounced the legal problem back to physicians to resolve. In the uncomfortable position of having to respond to an increasing demand for the surgery, specialist physicians responsible for sterilization, and their professional association, created a regulatory legal framework that ostensibly restricted the practice while actually enabling it. The provisions established by the professional association dictated access to sterilization in the country for over two decades, and were acknowledged not only by the population but also by state institutions, including those charged with surveying and protecting legality. A kind of judicial surrogacy was created in Costa Rica, though this surrogate role was not one Costa Rican physicians ever wanted, or felt comfortable playing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osiris
Osiris 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936 by George Sarton, and relaunched by the History of Science Society in 1985, Osiris is an annual thematic journal that highlights research on significant themes in the history of science. Recent volumes have included Scientific Masculinities, History of Science and the Emotions, and Data Histories.
期刊最新文献
Front and Back Matter Notes on the Contributors Acknowledgments Statecraft by Algorithms Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1