慢性脑卒中运动康复后触觉改善:有力的随机对照试验

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Pub Date : 2022-06-11 DOI:10.1177/15459683221107893
Alexandra L Borstad, D. Nichols-Larsen, G. Uswatte, Nancy Strahl, Marie Simeo, Rachel Proffitt, Lynne V. Gauthier
{"title":"慢性脑卒中运动康复后触觉改善:有力的随机对照试验","authors":"Alexandra L Borstad, D. Nichols-Larsen, G. Uswatte, Nancy Strahl, Marie Simeo, Rachel Proffitt, Lynne V. Gauthier","doi":"10.1177/15459683221107893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Up to 85% of people with chronic stroke experience somatosensory impairment, which contributes to poor sensorimotor control and non-use of the affected limb. Neurophysiological mechanisms suggest motor rehabilitation may improve tactile sense post-stroke, however, somatosensory recovery has rarely been reported in controlled trials. Objective. To compare the effect of four upper limb motor rehabilitation programs on the recovery of tactile sensation in adults with chronic stroke. Methods. Adults with chronic stroke and mild or moderate upper extremity hemiparesis (n = 167) were enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Participants completed three weeks of gaming therapy, gaming therapy with additional telerehabilition, Constraint-Induced Movement therapy, or traditional rehabilitation. Here, we report the results of a secondary outcome, tactile sensation, measured with monofilaments, before and after treatment, and 6 months later. Results. A mixed-effects general linear model revealed similar positive change in tactile sensitivity regardless of the type of training. On average, participants were able to detect a stimulus that was 32% and 33% less after training and at 6-month follow-up, respectively. One-third of participants experienced recategorization of their level of somatosensory impairment (e.g., regained protective sensation) following training. Poorer tactile sensation at baseline was associated with greater change. Conclusions. About one-third of individuals with mild/moderate chronic hemiparesis experience sustained improvements in tactile sensation following motor rehabilitation, regardless of the extent of tactile input in the rehabilitation program. Potential for sensory improvement is an additional motivator for those post-stroke. Characteristics of those who improve and mechanisms of improvement are important future questions. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631850","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"36 1","pages":"525 - 534"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra L Borstad, D. Nichols-Larsen, G. Uswatte, Nancy Strahl, Marie Simeo, Rachel Proffitt, Lynne V. Gauthier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683221107893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Up to 85% of people with chronic stroke experience somatosensory impairment, which contributes to poor sensorimotor control and non-use of the affected limb. Neurophysiological mechanisms suggest motor rehabilitation may improve tactile sense post-stroke, however, somatosensory recovery has rarely been reported in controlled trials. Objective. To compare the effect of four upper limb motor rehabilitation programs on the recovery of tactile sensation in adults with chronic stroke. Methods. Adults with chronic stroke and mild or moderate upper extremity hemiparesis (n = 167) were enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Participants completed three weeks of gaming therapy, gaming therapy with additional telerehabilition, Constraint-Induced Movement therapy, or traditional rehabilitation. Here, we report the results of a secondary outcome, tactile sensation, measured with monofilaments, before and after treatment, and 6 months later. Results. A mixed-effects general linear model revealed similar positive change in tactile sensitivity regardless of the type of training. On average, participants were able to detect a stimulus that was 32% and 33% less after training and at 6-month follow-up, respectively. One-third of participants experienced recategorization of their level of somatosensory impairment (e.g., regained protective sensation) following training. Poorer tactile sensation at baseline was associated with greater change. Conclusions. About one-third of individuals with mild/moderate chronic hemiparesis experience sustained improvements in tactile sensation following motor rehabilitation, regardless of the extent of tactile input in the rehabilitation program. Potential for sensory improvement is an additional motivator for those post-stroke. Characteristics of those who improve and mechanisms of improvement are important future questions. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631850\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"525 - 534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221107893\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221107893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景。高达85%的慢性中风患者经历体感障碍,这导致感觉运动控制不良和无法使用受影响的肢体。神经生理学机制提示运动康复可以改善中风后的触觉,然而,在对照试验中很少有躯体感觉恢复的报道。目标。目的比较四种上肢运动康复方案对成人慢性脑卒中患者触觉功能恢复的影响。方法。患有慢性中风和轻度或中度上肢偏瘫的成人(n = 167)被纳入一项多地点随机对照试验。参与者完成了三周的游戏治疗,游戏治疗加上额外的远程康复,约束诱导运动治疗或传统康复。在这里,我们报告了治疗前后和6个月后用单丝测量的次要结果触觉的结果。结果。混合效应一般线性模型显示,无论训练类型如何,触觉敏感性都有类似的积极变化。平均而言,参与者能够在训练后和6个月的随访中分别检测到32%和33%的刺激。三分之一的参与者在训练后经历了他们的体感损伤水平的重新分类(例如,恢复了保护性感觉)。基线时较差的触觉与较大的变化相关。结论。大约三分之一的轻度/中度慢性偏瘫患者在运动康复后触觉感觉持续改善,无论康复计划中触觉输入的程度如何。感觉改善的潜力是卒中后患者的另一个激励因素。改善者的特征和改善机制是未来的重要问题。Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631850
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial
Background. Up to 85% of people with chronic stroke experience somatosensory impairment, which contributes to poor sensorimotor control and non-use of the affected limb. Neurophysiological mechanisms suggest motor rehabilitation may improve tactile sense post-stroke, however, somatosensory recovery has rarely been reported in controlled trials. Objective. To compare the effect of four upper limb motor rehabilitation programs on the recovery of tactile sensation in adults with chronic stroke. Methods. Adults with chronic stroke and mild or moderate upper extremity hemiparesis (n = 167) were enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Participants completed three weeks of gaming therapy, gaming therapy with additional telerehabilition, Constraint-Induced Movement therapy, or traditional rehabilitation. Here, we report the results of a secondary outcome, tactile sensation, measured with monofilaments, before and after treatment, and 6 months later. Results. A mixed-effects general linear model revealed similar positive change in tactile sensitivity regardless of the type of training. On average, participants were able to detect a stimulus that was 32% and 33% less after training and at 6-month follow-up, respectively. One-third of participants experienced recategorization of their level of somatosensory impairment (e.g., regained protective sensation) following training. Poorer tactile sensation at baseline was associated with greater change. Conclusions. About one-third of individuals with mild/moderate chronic hemiparesis experience sustained improvements in tactile sensation following motor rehabilitation, regardless of the extent of tactile input in the rehabilitation program. Potential for sensory improvement is an additional motivator for those post-stroke. Characteristics of those who improve and mechanisms of improvement are important future questions. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631850
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
期刊最新文献
Altered Corticospinal and Intracortical Excitability After Stroke: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Hemodynamics of the Frontopolar and Dorsolateral Pre-Frontal Cortex in People with Multiple Sclerosis During Walking, Cognitive Subtraction, and Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task. Comparative Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Comparable outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures and for rotator cuff arthropathy in a predominantly asian population. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Digital Therapeutic to Enhance Gait Function in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1