加入或死亡:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,义务论道德直觉如何使合作复杂化

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Forum Italicum Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1177/00145858231166913
Alessandro Del Ponte
{"title":"加入或死亡:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,义务论道德直觉如何使合作复杂化","authors":"Alessandro Del Ponte","doi":"10.1177/00145858231166913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tackling COVID-19 requires universal collective action: everyone must play their part to reduce the spread of the virus and quell the pandemic. Yet, some people obstinately refuse to cooperate, irrespective of the consequences for themselves and others. In this note, I illustrate a key element of human psychology that hampers cooperation amid the pandemic: deontological moral intuitions. Deontological morality prescribes that moral taboos must be followed no matter the consequences. This means that people who consider Covid vaccines a moral taboo are prepared to suffer virtually any consequence rather than take the vaccine. I discuss the evolutionary basis of deontological intuitions, their implications for cooperation, and consider possible solutions. In conclusion, although not always harmful, deontological moral intuitions against Covid measures -and vaccines in particular- are a major obstacle that stands in the way of successful collective action during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":12355,"journal":{"name":"Forum Italicum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Join or die: How deontological moral intuitions complicate cooperation amid the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Del Ponte\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00145858231166913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tackling COVID-19 requires universal collective action: everyone must play their part to reduce the spread of the virus and quell the pandemic. Yet, some people obstinately refuse to cooperate, irrespective of the consequences for themselves and others. In this note, I illustrate a key element of human psychology that hampers cooperation amid the pandemic: deontological moral intuitions. Deontological morality prescribes that moral taboos must be followed no matter the consequences. This means that people who consider Covid vaccines a moral taboo are prepared to suffer virtually any consequence rather than take the vaccine. I discuss the evolutionary basis of deontological intuitions, their implications for cooperation, and consider possible solutions. In conclusion, although not always harmful, deontological moral intuitions against Covid measures -and vaccines in particular- are a major obstacle that stands in the way of successful collective action during the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forum Italicum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forum Italicum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00145858231166913\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Italicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00145858231166913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应对新冠肺炎需要普遍的集体行动:每个人都必须发挥自己的作用,减少病毒的传播,平息疫情。然而,有些人顽固地拒绝合作,不顾对自己和他人的后果。在这篇文章中,我阐述了在疫情期间阻碍合作的人类心理学的一个关键因素:义务论道德直觉。道德伦理规定,无论后果如何,都必须遵守道德禁忌。这意味着,那些认为新冠肺炎疫苗是道德禁忌的人准备承受几乎任何后果,而不是接种疫苗。我讨论义务论直觉的进化基础,它们对合作的影响,并考虑可能的解决方案。总之,尽管并非总是有害的,但反对新冠肺炎措施——尤其是疫苗——的道义道德直觉是在大流行期间成功采取集体行动的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Join or die: How deontological moral intuitions complicate cooperation amid the COVID-19 pandemic
Tackling COVID-19 requires universal collective action: everyone must play their part to reduce the spread of the virus and quell the pandemic. Yet, some people obstinately refuse to cooperate, irrespective of the consequences for themselves and others. In this note, I illustrate a key element of human psychology that hampers cooperation amid the pandemic: deontological moral intuitions. Deontological morality prescribes that moral taboos must be followed no matter the consequences. This means that people who consider Covid vaccines a moral taboo are prepared to suffer virtually any consequence rather than take the vaccine. I discuss the evolutionary basis of deontological intuitions, their implications for cooperation, and consider possible solutions. In conclusion, although not always harmful, deontological moral intuitions against Covid measures -and vaccines in particular- are a major obstacle that stands in the way of successful collective action during the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forum Italicum
Forum Italicum Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Levi, Bradbury e l’Ecclesiaste. Intertestualità e interdiscorsività in Trattamento di quiescenza Book review: La nott’e’l giorno. L’opera poetica by Patrizia Vicinelli Political and cultural changes as an effect of the pestilences and pandemics through the centuries: Case studies La letteratura nella didattica dell’italiano a stranieri: l’eredità di Leonardo Sciascia Book Review: Edizione nazionale degli scritti di Antonio Gramsci. Scritti (1910–1926). V. 3, 1918 by Antonio Gramsci
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1