增强现实在大学教育中应用的困难:专家的看法

IF 4.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research Pub Date : 2019-07-15 DOI:10.7821/NAER.2019.7.409
Julio Barroso Osuna, Juan-Jesús Gutiérrez-Castillo, María del Carmen Llorente-Cejudo, Rubicelia Valencia Ortiz
{"title":"增强现实在大学教育中应用的困难:专家的看法","authors":"Julio Barroso Osuna, Juan-Jesús Gutiérrez-Castillo, María del Carmen Llorente-Cejudo, Rubicelia Valencia Ortiz","doi":"10.7821/NAER.2019.7.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Augmented reality” (AR) is presented as technology that harmonizes, in real time and with user collaboration, digital information with physical information through different technological supports. Such are AR possibilities, that when it is incorporated into teaching, students show high satisfaction rates and positive attitudes for its use, but at the same time, a series of limitations and obstacles can be noticed. As an attempt to investigate the technical, curricular and organizational difficulties of AR incorporation in training contexts, an instrument “AR obstacle questionnaire” (CORA) was designed, which in turn was administered to a total of 264 subject experts for validation through the Delphi method, subsequently applying the “K coefficient” (K = ½ Kc (knowledge coefficient) + Ka (argumentation coefficient)), selecting those experts who obtained a ≥ 0,8 score in the coefficient. Among the results obtained in the study we manage to point out the main obstacles involving AR implementation into university education: the lack of teacher training and improvement, the few educational experiences found, lack of conceptual foundation, limited educational research and lack of institutional support.","PeriodicalId":51833,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difficulties in the Incorporation of Augmented Reality in University Education: Visions from the Experts\",\"authors\":\"Julio Barroso Osuna, Juan-Jesús Gutiérrez-Castillo, María del Carmen Llorente-Cejudo, Rubicelia Valencia Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.7821/NAER.2019.7.409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Augmented reality” (AR) is presented as technology that harmonizes, in real time and with user collaboration, digital information with physical information through different technological supports. Such are AR possibilities, that when it is incorporated into teaching, students show high satisfaction rates and positive attitudes for its use, but at the same time, a series of limitations and obstacles can be noticed. As an attempt to investigate the technical, curricular and organizational difficulties of AR incorporation in training contexts, an instrument “AR obstacle questionnaire” (CORA) was designed, which in turn was administered to a total of 264 subject experts for validation through the Delphi method, subsequently applying the “K coefficient” (K = ½ Kc (knowledge coefficient) + Ka (argumentation coefficient)), selecting those experts who obtained a ≥ 0,8 score in the coefficient. Among the results obtained in the study we manage to point out the main obstacles involving AR implementation into university education: the lack of teacher training and improvement, the few educational experiences found, lack of conceptual foundation, limited educational research and lack of institutional support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7821/NAER.2019.7.409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7821/NAER.2019.7.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

摘要

“增强现实”(AR)是一种通过不同的技术支持,在实时和用户协作的情况下,协调数字信息和物理信息的技术。这些都是增强现实的可能性,当它被纳入教学时,学生对它的使用表现出很高的满意度和积极的态度,但同时也可以注意到一系列的限制和障碍。为了探讨培训情境中AR整合的技术、课程和组织困难,设计了一份“AR障碍问卷”(CORA),通过德尔菲法对264名受试者专家进行验证,然后应用“K系数”(K =½Kc(知识系数)+ Ka(论证系数)),选择系数得分≥0.8分的专家。在研究所得的结果中,我们设法指出了AR在大学教育中实施的主要障碍:缺乏教师培训和改进,发现的教育经验很少,缺乏概念基础,教育研究有限,缺乏制度支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Difficulties in the Incorporation of Augmented Reality in University Education: Visions from the Experts
“Augmented reality” (AR) is presented as technology that harmonizes, in real time and with user collaboration, digital information with physical information through different technological supports. Such are AR possibilities, that when it is incorporated into teaching, students show high satisfaction rates and positive attitudes for its use, but at the same time, a series of limitations and obstacles can be noticed. As an attempt to investigate the technical, curricular and organizational difficulties of AR incorporation in training contexts, an instrument “AR obstacle questionnaire” (CORA) was designed, which in turn was administered to a total of 264 subject experts for validation through the Delphi method, subsequently applying the “K coefficient” (K = ½ Kc (knowledge coefficient) + Ka (argumentation coefficient)), selecting those experts who obtained a ≥ 0,8 score in the coefficient. Among the results obtained in the study we manage to point out the main obstacles involving AR implementation into university education: the lack of teacher training and improvement, the few educational experiences found, lack of conceptual foundation, limited educational research and lack of institutional support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: NAER seeks academic articles on educational sciences based on innovative experiences which can contribute the development of the educational sciences in any of their manifestations and provide new approaches to teaching as a response to the deep changes our society is going through.
期刊最新文献
Improving reporting standards in quantitative educational intervention research: introducing the CLOSER and CIDER checklists. Violence and the Right to Education in the Northern Triangle of Central America The 'Birth of Doubt' and 'The Existence of Other Possibilities': Exploring How the ACAD Toolkit Supports Design for Learning Suicidal Ideation in Undergraduate Students of Social Work: A Quantitative Study Moving Learning: A Systematic Review of Mobile Learning Applications for Online Higher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1