{"title":"失语症中共同基础的扩展概念","authors":"Roberto Graci","doi":"10.1515/ip-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to analyze the evolution of the Common Ground notion in theoretical and sociocognitive fields. Some recent studies from psychology, cognitive sciences, and socio-linguistics have enriched the traditional formulations on CG by analyzing various factors related to the nature of mental processes. It emerged that CG is a dynamic entity where sources of different nature interact in a complex way during the communication process. On the other hand, contemporary clinical investigations on CG and aphasia seem to overlook the multiple and dynamic factors involved in the communication between patients and ordinary speakers. Although most experimental studies prove that any form of knowledge can, in principle, support communication with aphasic patients, it seems that they focus their attention only on an isolated aspect of the situational or past context. A general theory that explains how personal, cultural, or perceptual knowledge jointly mediates the understanding of texts produced by aphasic patients is missing. This work does not intend to offer such a theory. Instead, it has the less ambitious purpose of highlighting the current limitations related to the practice of breaking down and analyzing isolated features of the CG. Highlighting these limitations is essential in pushing aphasiology research towards introducing more complex models of CG adhering to the reality of the facts.","PeriodicalId":13669,"journal":{"name":"Intercultural Pragmatics","volume":"20 1","pages":"29 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an extended notion of Common Ground in aphasiology\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Graci\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ip-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article aims to analyze the evolution of the Common Ground notion in theoretical and sociocognitive fields. Some recent studies from psychology, cognitive sciences, and socio-linguistics have enriched the traditional formulations on CG by analyzing various factors related to the nature of mental processes. It emerged that CG is a dynamic entity where sources of different nature interact in a complex way during the communication process. On the other hand, contemporary clinical investigations on CG and aphasia seem to overlook the multiple and dynamic factors involved in the communication between patients and ordinary speakers. Although most experimental studies prove that any form of knowledge can, in principle, support communication with aphasic patients, it seems that they focus their attention only on an isolated aspect of the situational or past context. A general theory that explains how personal, cultural, or perceptual knowledge jointly mediates the understanding of texts produced by aphasic patients is missing. This work does not intend to offer such a theory. Instead, it has the less ambitious purpose of highlighting the current limitations related to the practice of breaking down and analyzing isolated features of the CG. Highlighting these limitations is essential in pushing aphasiology research towards introducing more complex models of CG adhering to the reality of the facts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intercultural Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intercultural Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intercultural Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-0002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards an extended notion of Common Ground in aphasiology
Abstract This article aims to analyze the evolution of the Common Ground notion in theoretical and sociocognitive fields. Some recent studies from psychology, cognitive sciences, and socio-linguistics have enriched the traditional formulations on CG by analyzing various factors related to the nature of mental processes. It emerged that CG is a dynamic entity where sources of different nature interact in a complex way during the communication process. On the other hand, contemporary clinical investigations on CG and aphasia seem to overlook the multiple and dynamic factors involved in the communication between patients and ordinary speakers. Although most experimental studies prove that any form of knowledge can, in principle, support communication with aphasic patients, it seems that they focus their attention only on an isolated aspect of the situational or past context. A general theory that explains how personal, cultural, or perceptual knowledge jointly mediates the understanding of texts produced by aphasic patients is missing. This work does not intend to offer such a theory. Instead, it has the less ambitious purpose of highlighting the current limitations related to the practice of breaking down and analyzing isolated features of the CG. Highlighting these limitations is essential in pushing aphasiology research towards introducing more complex models of CG adhering to the reality of the facts.
期刊介绍:
Intercultural Pragmatics is a fully peer-reviewed forum for theoretical and applied pragmatics research. The goal of the journal is to promote the development and understanding of pragmatic theory and intercultural competence by publishing research that focuses on general theoretical issues, more than one language and culture, or varieties of one language. Intercultural Pragmatics encourages ‘interculturality’ both within the discipline and in pragmatic research. It supports interaction and scholarly debate between researchers representing different subfields of pragmatics including the linguistic, cognitive, social, and interlanguage paradigms. The intercultural perspective is relevant not only to each line of research within pragmatics but also extends to several other disciplines such as anthropology, theoretical and applied linguistics, psychology, communication, sociolinguistics, second language acquisition, and bi- and multilingualism. Intercultural Pragmatics makes a special effort to cross disciplinary boundaries. What we primarily look for is innovative approaches and ideas that do not always fit into existing paradigms, and lead to new ways of thinking about language. Intercultural Pragmatics has always encouraged the publication of theoretical papers including linguistic and philosophical pragmatics that are very important for research in intercultural pragmatics.