失语症中共同基础的扩展概念

IF 1.8 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Intercultural Pragmatics Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.1515/ip-2023-0002
Roberto Graci
{"title":"失语症中共同基础的扩展概念","authors":"Roberto Graci","doi":"10.1515/ip-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to analyze the evolution of the Common Ground notion in theoretical and sociocognitive fields. Some recent studies from psychology, cognitive sciences, and socio-linguistics have enriched the traditional formulations on CG by analyzing various factors related to the nature of mental processes. It emerged that CG is a dynamic entity where sources of different nature interact in a complex way during the communication process. On the other hand, contemporary clinical investigations on CG and aphasia seem to overlook the multiple and dynamic factors involved in the communication between patients and ordinary speakers. Although most experimental studies prove that any form of knowledge can, in principle, support communication with aphasic patients, it seems that they focus their attention only on an isolated aspect of the situational or past context. A general theory that explains how personal, cultural, or perceptual knowledge jointly mediates the understanding of texts produced by aphasic patients is missing. This work does not intend to offer such a theory. Instead, it has the less ambitious purpose of highlighting the current limitations related to the practice of breaking down and analyzing isolated features of the CG. Highlighting these limitations is essential in pushing aphasiology research towards introducing more complex models of CG adhering to the reality of the facts.","PeriodicalId":13669,"journal":{"name":"Intercultural Pragmatics","volume":"20 1","pages":"29 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an extended notion of Common Ground in aphasiology\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Graci\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ip-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article aims to analyze the evolution of the Common Ground notion in theoretical and sociocognitive fields. Some recent studies from psychology, cognitive sciences, and socio-linguistics have enriched the traditional formulations on CG by analyzing various factors related to the nature of mental processes. It emerged that CG is a dynamic entity where sources of different nature interact in a complex way during the communication process. On the other hand, contemporary clinical investigations on CG and aphasia seem to overlook the multiple and dynamic factors involved in the communication between patients and ordinary speakers. Although most experimental studies prove that any form of knowledge can, in principle, support communication with aphasic patients, it seems that they focus their attention only on an isolated aspect of the situational or past context. A general theory that explains how personal, cultural, or perceptual knowledge jointly mediates the understanding of texts produced by aphasic patients is missing. This work does not intend to offer such a theory. Instead, it has the less ambitious purpose of highlighting the current limitations related to the practice of breaking down and analyzing isolated features of the CG. Highlighting these limitations is essential in pushing aphasiology research towards introducing more complex models of CG adhering to the reality of the facts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intercultural Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intercultural Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intercultural Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-0002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文旨在分析共同点概念在理论和社会认知领域的演变。心理学、认知科学和社会语言学最近的一些研究通过分析与心理过程性质相关的各种因素,丰富了CG的传统公式。CG是一个动态的实体,在交流过程中,不同性质的来源以复杂的方式相互作用。另一方面,当代对CG和失语症的临床研究似乎忽视了患者与普通说话者之间交流的多种动态因素。尽管大多数实验研究证明,原则上,任何形式的知识都可以支持与失语症患者的沟通,但他们似乎只将注意力集中在情境或过去背景的一个孤立方面。一种解释个人、文化或感知知识如何共同中介对失语症患者产生的文本的理解的一般理论是缺失的。这项工作不打算提供这样的理论。相反,它没有那么雄心勃勃的目的,即强调当前与分解和分析CG的孤立特征的实践相关的局限性。强调这些局限性对于推动失语症研究引入更复杂的CG模型至关重要,因为这些模型符合事实的真实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards an extended notion of Common Ground in aphasiology
Abstract This article aims to analyze the evolution of the Common Ground notion in theoretical and sociocognitive fields. Some recent studies from psychology, cognitive sciences, and socio-linguistics have enriched the traditional formulations on CG by analyzing various factors related to the nature of mental processes. It emerged that CG is a dynamic entity where sources of different nature interact in a complex way during the communication process. On the other hand, contemporary clinical investigations on CG and aphasia seem to overlook the multiple and dynamic factors involved in the communication between patients and ordinary speakers. Although most experimental studies prove that any form of knowledge can, in principle, support communication with aphasic patients, it seems that they focus their attention only on an isolated aspect of the situational or past context. A general theory that explains how personal, cultural, or perceptual knowledge jointly mediates the understanding of texts produced by aphasic patients is missing. This work does not intend to offer such a theory. Instead, it has the less ambitious purpose of highlighting the current limitations related to the practice of breaking down and analyzing isolated features of the CG. Highlighting these limitations is essential in pushing aphasiology research towards introducing more complex models of CG adhering to the reality of the facts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Intercultural Pragmatics is a fully peer-reviewed forum for theoretical and applied pragmatics research. The goal of the journal is to promote the development and understanding of pragmatic theory and intercultural competence by publishing research that focuses on general theoretical issues, more than one language and culture, or varieties of one language. Intercultural Pragmatics encourages ‘interculturality’ both within the discipline and in pragmatic research. It supports interaction and scholarly debate between researchers representing different subfields of pragmatics including the linguistic, cognitive, social, and interlanguage paradigms. The intercultural perspective is relevant not only to each line of research within pragmatics but also extends to several other disciplines such as anthropology, theoretical and applied linguistics, psychology, communication, sociolinguistics, second language acquisition, and bi- and multilingualism. Intercultural Pragmatics makes a special effort to cross disciplinary boundaries. What we primarily look for is innovative approaches and ideas that do not always fit into existing paradigms, and lead to new ways of thinking about language. Intercultural Pragmatics has always encouraged the publication of theoretical papers including linguistic and philosophical pragmatics that are very important for research in intercultural pragmatics.
期刊最新文献
“You’re such an idiot, but I’m only joking”: The perception of mock impoliteness by British and Italian men and women Self-translations in multilingual workplace interaction Facing differences in conceptualizing “Face” in everyday interacting Interculturality and decision making: Pursuing jointness in online teams Autistic children and control children use similar strategies when answering false belief questions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1