受害对犯罪的影响:一般应变理论、犯罪倾向、风险、保护和弹性的检验

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Victims & Offenders Pub Date : 2022-06-13 DOI:10.1080/15564886.2022.2077495
Mackenzie Kushner, A. Fagan
{"title":"受害对犯罪的影响:一般应变理论、犯罪倾向、风险、保护和弹性的检验","authors":"Mackenzie Kushner, A. Fagan","doi":"10.1080/15564886.2022.2077495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT General strain theory (GST) proposes that criminal coping is most likely for victims who possess multiple individual and environmental risk factors that together create a strong propensity for offending. However, this conceptualization does not consider the potential buffering effects of multiple protective factors on the victimization/offending relationship. This study addresses this limitation using self-report data from waves I and II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) (N = 13,346). Negative binomial logistic regression models assessed the conditioning effects of composite and individual measures representing criminal propensity/risk and protection/resilience on the victim/offending relationship. Results support GST’s premise that victimization increases involvement in offending but, contrary to GST, greater risk weakened the relationship between victimization and offending while greater protection strengthened this relationship. Findings highlight a need for further theoretical development and a greater understanding of the subjective experience of victimization and pathways associated with increased risk and resiliency.","PeriodicalId":47085,"journal":{"name":"Victims & Offenders","volume":"18 1","pages":"1009 - 1029"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Victimization on Offending: An Examination of General Strain Theory, Criminal Propensity, Risk, Protection, and Resilience\",\"authors\":\"Mackenzie Kushner, A. Fagan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15564886.2022.2077495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT General strain theory (GST) proposes that criminal coping is most likely for victims who possess multiple individual and environmental risk factors that together create a strong propensity for offending. However, this conceptualization does not consider the potential buffering effects of multiple protective factors on the victimization/offending relationship. This study addresses this limitation using self-report data from waves I and II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) (N = 13,346). Negative binomial logistic regression models assessed the conditioning effects of composite and individual measures representing criminal propensity/risk and protection/resilience on the victim/offending relationship. Results support GST’s premise that victimization increases involvement in offending but, contrary to GST, greater risk weakened the relationship between victimization and offending while greater protection strengthened this relationship. Findings highlight a need for further theoretical development and a greater understanding of the subjective experience of victimization and pathways associated with increased risk and resiliency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Victims & Offenders\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"1009 - 1029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Victims & Offenders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2077495\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victims & Offenders","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2077495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

一般紧张理论(GST)提出,犯罪应对最有可能发生在具有多种个人和环境风险因素的受害者身上,这些因素共同产生了强烈的犯罪倾向。然而,这种概念化没有考虑多种保护因素对受害/犯罪关系的潜在缓冲作用。这项研究利用国家青少年至成人健康纵向研究(添加健康)第一波和第二波的自我报告数据解决了这一限制(N=13346)。负二项逻辑回归模型评估了代表犯罪倾向/风险和保护/复原力的综合和个人措施对受害者/犯罪关系的制约作用。结果支持商品及服务税的前提,即受害增加了犯罪的参与,但与商品及服务税法相反,更大的风险削弱了受害和犯罪之间的关系,而更大的保护加强了这种关系。研究结果强调,需要进一步的理论发展,更好地了解受害的主观体验以及与风险和复原力增加相关的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effects of Victimization on Offending: An Examination of General Strain Theory, Criminal Propensity, Risk, Protection, and Resilience
ABSTRACT General strain theory (GST) proposes that criminal coping is most likely for victims who possess multiple individual and environmental risk factors that together create a strong propensity for offending. However, this conceptualization does not consider the potential buffering effects of multiple protective factors on the victimization/offending relationship. This study addresses this limitation using self-report data from waves I and II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) (N = 13,346). Negative binomial logistic regression models assessed the conditioning effects of composite and individual measures representing criminal propensity/risk and protection/resilience on the victim/offending relationship. Results support GST’s premise that victimization increases involvement in offending but, contrary to GST, greater risk weakened the relationship between victimization and offending while greater protection strengthened this relationship. Findings highlight a need for further theoretical development and a greater understanding of the subjective experience of victimization and pathways associated with increased risk and resiliency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Victims & Offenders
Victims & Offenders CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Victims & Offenders is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an interdisciplinary and international forum for the dissemination of new research, policies, and practices related to both victimization and offending throughout the life course. Our aim is to provide an opportunity for researchers -- both in the United States and internationally -- from a wide range of disciplines (criminal justice, psychology, sociology, political science, economics, public health, and social work) to publish articles that examine issues from a variety of perspectives in a unique, interdisciplinary forum. We are interested in both quantitative and qualitative research, systematic, evidence-based reviews, and articles that focus on theory development related to offenders and victims.
期刊最新文献
Veterans Treatment Courts: A Nationwide Review of Enacting and Eligibility State Statutes. The Influence of Offender Motivation on Unwanted Pursuit Perpetration Among College Students Relatives’ Understanding of Perpetrators of Elder Family Financial Exploitation: A Bioecological Approach to Understanding Risk Factors What Separates Offenders Who are Not Victimized from Offenders Who are Victimized? Results from a Nationally Representative Sample of Males and Females Scams, Cons, Frauds, and Deceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1