中国气候变化证券化对全球气候治理的启示

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-08-19 DOI:10.1142/S2377740019500076
M. Trombetta
{"title":"中国气候变化证券化对全球气候治理的启示","authors":"M. Trombetta","doi":"10.1142/S2377740019500076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the traditional resistance to consider climate change as a national security issue, the security impact of climate change has been increasingly recognized by official discourses in China over the past few years. The Chinese perception on climate change has shifted from a development issue to a security topic; and two driving forces are behind the emergence of the climate security discourse: the shift of China’s economy towards a “New Normal” and the commitments China made in the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Meanwhile, two modalities of discourse that characterize the Chinese context are also discerned. One that involves national security has a rather fixed procedure about how security can be spoken of and by whom; the other is more relevant for issues like climate change and air pollution. In both cases, even if the language of security is used with regard to climate issues, they are handled as normal politics and governmental actions are legitimized by the use of security language. Although China has taken on more climate responsibilities, it seems unprepared for global climate leadership because security considerations not only determine the country’s participation but also limit its international commitments in global climate governance.","PeriodicalId":42595,"journal":{"name":"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S2377740019500076","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Securitization of Climate Change in China: Implications for Global Climate Governance\",\"authors\":\"M. Trombetta\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2377740019500076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the traditional resistance to consider climate change as a national security issue, the security impact of climate change has been increasingly recognized by official discourses in China over the past few years. The Chinese perception on climate change has shifted from a development issue to a security topic; and two driving forces are behind the emergence of the climate security discourse: the shift of China’s economy towards a “New Normal” and the commitments China made in the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Meanwhile, two modalities of discourse that characterize the Chinese context are also discerned. One that involves national security has a rather fixed procedure about how security can be spoken of and by whom; the other is more relevant for issues like climate change and air pollution. In both cases, even if the language of security is used with regard to climate issues, they are handled as normal politics and governmental actions are legitimized by the use of security language. Although China has taken on more climate responsibilities, it seems unprepared for global climate leadership because security considerations not only determine the country’s participation but also limit its international commitments in global climate governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S2377740019500076\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740019500076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740019500076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

尽管传统上反对将气候变化视为国家安全问题,但在过去几年中,气候变化的安全影响已越来越多地得到中国官方话语的认可。中国对气候变化的看法已经从发展问题转变为安全问题;气候安全话语的出现背后有两个驱动力:中国经济向“新常态”的转变和中国在《巴黎气候变化协定》中的承诺。同时,我们也发现了两种具有中国语境特征的话语模式。一个是涉及国家安全的,有一个相当固定的程序,关于如何谈论安全以及由谁来谈论安全;另一个则与气候变化和空气污染等问题更为相关。在这两种情况下,即使在气候问题上使用了安全语言,它们也被当作正常的政治来处理,政府行为也通过使用安全语言而合法化。尽管中国承担了更多的气候责任,但它似乎还没有做好领导全球气候变化的准备,因为安全考虑不仅决定了中国的参与,也限制了中国在全球气候治理中的国际承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Securitization of Climate Change in China: Implications for Global Climate Governance
Despite the traditional resistance to consider climate change as a national security issue, the security impact of climate change has been increasingly recognized by official discourses in China over the past few years. The Chinese perception on climate change has shifted from a development issue to a security topic; and two driving forces are behind the emergence of the climate security discourse: the shift of China’s economy towards a “New Normal” and the commitments China made in the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Meanwhile, two modalities of discourse that characterize the Chinese context are also discerned. One that involves national security has a rather fixed procedure about how security can be spoken of and by whom; the other is more relevant for issues like climate change and air pollution. In both cases, even if the language of security is used with regard to climate issues, they are handled as normal politics and governmental actions are legitimized by the use of security language. Although China has taken on more climate responsibilities, it seems unprepared for global climate leadership because security considerations not only determine the country’s participation but also limit its international commitments in global climate governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
China's Policy toward Afghanistan and Its Impact on India Exporting the American Dream? Ideology and US China Policy Since 9/11 From Communist Allies to Pragmatics Partners: A Historical View of Albanian–Chinese Relations China–EU Climate Complex Interdependence Amid Covid-19 and Geopolitical Tensions: Prospects for Future The Chinese and American Military Installations in Djibouti: National and Regional Security Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1