{"title":"舌神经显微外科重建中的神经移植","authors":"Claudio Huentequeo , Carolina Ulloa , Pilar Schneeberger , Sergio Olate","doi":"10.1016/j.rmclc.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Lingual nerve (LN) microsurgical reconstruction is an effective technique with a high success rate. Early surgery is associated with better results. Direct nerve reconstruction and graft reconstruction, whether by allograft or autograft, all present a favorable prognosis. This article presents the treatment protocol in 3 cases of microsurgical reconstruction of the lingual nerve using nerve grafts.</p></div><div><h3>Case</h3><p>The maxillofacial surgery team treated patients from Hospital Dr. Abraham Godoy Peña, Clínica Alemana de Temuco and Hospital Padre Las Casas (Chile). Microsurgical reconstruction by autogenous grafts was performed in 2 cases and allograft in one case; all of them showed positive results (S3+), along with functional sensorial improvemente (FSR+), and recovery of taste.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>LN surgery has been more studied in the last decade. Although many studies with different results exist, early direct reconstruction contributes to better results in FSR. The grafts are reserved for circumstances where the tension doesn’t allow a reasonable reconstruction of the LN. The autologous graft has been the gold standard, the sural nerve being the most used. The cost-benefit of using allografts has likewise been widely endorsed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Autolog graft and allograft, in either early or late interventions, have excellent success rates, comparable with direct lingual nerve reconstruction. Further evaluation regarding autologous graft morbidity versus allograft costs is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31544,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 282-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injertos nerviosos en la reconstrucción microquirúrgica del nervio lingual\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Huentequeo , Carolina Ulloa , Pilar Schneeberger , Sergio Olate\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmclc.2023.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Lingual nerve (LN) microsurgical reconstruction is an effective technique with a high success rate. Early surgery is associated with better results. Direct nerve reconstruction and graft reconstruction, whether by allograft or autograft, all present a favorable prognosis. This article presents the treatment protocol in 3 cases of microsurgical reconstruction of the lingual nerve using nerve grafts.</p></div><div><h3>Case</h3><p>The maxillofacial surgery team treated patients from Hospital Dr. Abraham Godoy Peña, Clínica Alemana de Temuco and Hospital Padre Las Casas (Chile). Microsurgical reconstruction by autogenous grafts was performed in 2 cases and allograft in one case; all of them showed positive results (S3+), along with functional sensorial improvemente (FSR+), and recovery of taste.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>LN surgery has been more studied in the last decade. Although many studies with different results exist, early direct reconstruction contributes to better results in FSR. The grafts are reserved for circumstances where the tension doesn’t allow a reasonable reconstruction of the LN. The autologous graft has been the gold standard, the sural nerve being the most used. The cost-benefit of using allografts has likewise been widely endorsed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Autolog graft and allograft, in either early or late interventions, have excellent success rates, comparable with direct lingual nerve reconstruction. Further evaluation regarding autologous graft morbidity versus allograft costs is needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 282-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0716864023000524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0716864023000524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
舌神经显微外科重建是一种成功率高的有效技术。手术越早,效果越好。直接神经重建和移植物重建,无论是同种异体移植物还是自体移植物,都有良好的预后。本文介绍了3例舌神经移植显微外科重建的治疗方法。颌面外科小组治疗了来自Abraham Godoy博士医院Peña, Clínica Alemana de Temuco医院和Padre Las Casas医院(智利)的患者。显微外科重建自体移植物2例,同种异体移植物1例;结果均为阳性(S3+),并伴有功能性感官改善(FSR+)和味觉恢复。在过去的十年里,ln手术得到了更多的研究。虽然有许多研究结果不一,但早期的直接重建有助于FSR的更好效果。移植物保留在张力不允许合理重建LN的情况下。自体移植物一直是金标准,腓肠神经是最常用的。同种异体移植的成本效益同样得到了广泛认可。结论自体神经移植和同种异体神经移植在早期或晚期干预中均具有良好的成功率,可与直接舌神经重建相媲美。需要进一步评估自体移植物的发病率与同种异体移植物的成本。
Injertos nerviosos en la reconstrucción microquirúrgica del nervio lingual
Introduction
Lingual nerve (LN) microsurgical reconstruction is an effective technique with a high success rate. Early surgery is associated with better results. Direct nerve reconstruction and graft reconstruction, whether by allograft or autograft, all present a favorable prognosis. This article presents the treatment protocol in 3 cases of microsurgical reconstruction of the lingual nerve using nerve grafts.
Case
The maxillofacial surgery team treated patients from Hospital Dr. Abraham Godoy Peña, Clínica Alemana de Temuco and Hospital Padre Las Casas (Chile). Microsurgical reconstruction by autogenous grafts was performed in 2 cases and allograft in one case; all of them showed positive results (S3+), along with functional sensorial improvemente (FSR+), and recovery of taste.
Discussion
LN surgery has been more studied in the last decade. Although many studies with different results exist, early direct reconstruction contributes to better results in FSR. The grafts are reserved for circumstances where the tension doesn’t allow a reasonable reconstruction of the LN. The autologous graft has been the gold standard, the sural nerve being the most used. The cost-benefit of using allografts has likewise been widely endorsed.
Conclusion
Autolog graft and allograft, in either early or late interventions, have excellent success rates, comparable with direct lingual nerve reconstruction. Further evaluation regarding autologous graft morbidity versus allograft costs is needed.