用元认知支架和增强现实支持非正式科学学习:对科学知识、内在动机和认知负荷的影响

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Science & Technological Education Pub Date : 2022-01-27 DOI:10.1080/02635143.2022.2032629
Ching-Huei Chen, Wen-Pi Chan, Kun Huang, C. Liao
{"title":"用元认知支架和增强现实支持非正式科学学习:对科学知识、内在动机和认知负荷的影响","authors":"Ching-Huei Chen, Wen-Pi Chan, Kun Huang, C. Liao","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2022.2032629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Museums have been paying an increasing attention to the design of experiences conducive to informal learning. While spontaneous inquiries in museums often pique visitors’ intrinsic motivation to learn, certain structures or scaffolds are needed to facilitate sense making in museum learning. Two promising approaches are identified: metacognitive scaffolding and augmented reality (AR) that offer on-demand content and interactions. Purpose This study aimed to answer the following research question: Compared with metacognitive scaffolding alone, how does the access to additional AR content affect informal learning experiences in a science museum in terms of science content knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive load?. Sample The sample of the study consisted of 63 sixth-grade students divided into two groups. The treatment group (31) received both metacognitive scaffolding and AR support in their museum visit, whereas the control group (32) received only metacognitive scaffolding. Design and methods A quasi-experimental research design was conducted. The independent variable was the treatment conditions, and the dependent variables were students’ science knowledge test performance, learning motivation, and cognitive load. The research instrument for this study included a science knowledge test, a learning motivation survey, and a perceived cognitive load questionnaire. Results The results revealed that the combination of metacognitive scaffolding and AR led the treatment group to significantly outcome the control group in the science knowledge post-test, but the effect did not last in the 2-week delayed retention test. The control group perceived more importance in the museum learning activity. No difference was found in cognitive load. Conclusions Metacognitive scaffolding may have an enduring impact on science learning in museums. The long-term impact of AR needs further investigation. Balance should be maintained between structure and open exploration to sustain intrinsic motivation in informal learning settings.","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting informal science learning with metacognitive scaffolding and augmented reality: effects on science knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive load\",\"authors\":\"Ching-Huei Chen, Wen-Pi Chan, Kun Huang, C. Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02635143.2022.2032629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Museums have been paying an increasing attention to the design of experiences conducive to informal learning. While spontaneous inquiries in museums often pique visitors’ intrinsic motivation to learn, certain structures or scaffolds are needed to facilitate sense making in museum learning. Two promising approaches are identified: metacognitive scaffolding and augmented reality (AR) that offer on-demand content and interactions. Purpose This study aimed to answer the following research question: Compared with metacognitive scaffolding alone, how does the access to additional AR content affect informal learning experiences in a science museum in terms of science content knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive load?. Sample The sample of the study consisted of 63 sixth-grade students divided into two groups. The treatment group (31) received both metacognitive scaffolding and AR support in their museum visit, whereas the control group (32) received only metacognitive scaffolding. Design and methods A quasi-experimental research design was conducted. The independent variable was the treatment conditions, and the dependent variables were students’ science knowledge test performance, learning motivation, and cognitive load. The research instrument for this study included a science knowledge test, a learning motivation survey, and a perceived cognitive load questionnaire. Results The results revealed that the combination of metacognitive scaffolding and AR led the treatment group to significantly outcome the control group in the science knowledge post-test, but the effect did not last in the 2-week delayed retention test. The control group perceived more importance in the museum learning activity. No difference was found in cognitive load. Conclusions Metacognitive scaffolding may have an enduring impact on science learning in museums. The long-term impact of AR needs further investigation. Balance should be maintained between structure and open exploration to sustain intrinsic motivation in informal learning settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2032629\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2032629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supporting informal science learning with metacognitive scaffolding and augmented reality: effects on science knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive load
ABSTRACT Background Museums have been paying an increasing attention to the design of experiences conducive to informal learning. While spontaneous inquiries in museums often pique visitors’ intrinsic motivation to learn, certain structures or scaffolds are needed to facilitate sense making in museum learning. Two promising approaches are identified: metacognitive scaffolding and augmented reality (AR) that offer on-demand content and interactions. Purpose This study aimed to answer the following research question: Compared with metacognitive scaffolding alone, how does the access to additional AR content affect informal learning experiences in a science museum in terms of science content knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive load?. Sample The sample of the study consisted of 63 sixth-grade students divided into two groups. The treatment group (31) received both metacognitive scaffolding and AR support in their museum visit, whereas the control group (32) received only metacognitive scaffolding. Design and methods A quasi-experimental research design was conducted. The independent variable was the treatment conditions, and the dependent variables were students’ science knowledge test performance, learning motivation, and cognitive load. The research instrument for this study included a science knowledge test, a learning motivation survey, and a perceived cognitive load questionnaire. Results The results revealed that the combination of metacognitive scaffolding and AR led the treatment group to significantly outcome the control group in the science knowledge post-test, but the effect did not last in the 2-week delayed retention test. The control group perceived more importance in the museum learning activity. No difference was found in cognitive load. Conclusions Metacognitive scaffolding may have an enduring impact on science learning in museums. The long-term impact of AR needs further investigation. Balance should be maintained between structure and open exploration to sustain intrinsic motivation in informal learning settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Ocean wave energy learning project (OWELP): a program to communicate alternative energy technology Development and use of an instrument to measure pseudoscientific beliefs in quantum mechanics: the PSEUDO-QM scale Teachers’ views on the potential of school science clubs for enhancing their learning Turkish adaptation of the science-P reasoning inventory: examining the relationships between epistemological beliefs, gender, and residential area Navigating the AI-Enhanced STEM education landscape: a decade of insights, trends, and opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1