两种不同腹腔镜左半肝切除术技术的比较研究

Baiwen Chen, K. Qiu, Hong Li
{"title":"两种不同腹腔镜左半肝切除术技术的比较研究","authors":"Baiwen Chen, K. Qiu, Hong Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2019.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the safety and efficacy of the retrograde and the antegrade techniques in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. \n \n \nMethods \nOf the 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy between January 2016 to June 2018 at the Ningbo Li Huili Hospital of Medical Center, retrograde left hemihepatectomy was carried out in 31 patients, and antegrade left hemihepatectomy in 34 patients. The perioperative data, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications (including major bleeding, abdominal abscess and bile leakage), and post-operative hospital stay were retrospectively compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nThere were no significant differences in the perioperative general status between the two groups (P>0.05). Both the duration of operation [(121.5±22.1) min vs. (190.9±48.9) min, P 0.05]. \n \n \nConclusions \nOcclusion of hepatic vascular inflow and outflow combined with retrograde left hemihepatectomy was safe and feasibly. The retrograde approach was superior to the antegrade approach in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. \n \n \nKey words: \nLaparoscopes; Hepatectomy; Retrograde; Antegrade","PeriodicalId":10021,"journal":{"name":"中华肝胆外科杂志","volume":"25 1","pages":"815-818"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on two different techniques in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Baiwen Chen, K. Qiu, Hong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2019.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the safety and efficacy of the retrograde and the antegrade techniques in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nOf the 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy between January 2016 to June 2018 at the Ningbo Li Huili Hospital of Medical Center, retrograde left hemihepatectomy was carried out in 31 patients, and antegrade left hemihepatectomy in 34 patients. The perioperative data, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications (including major bleeding, abdominal abscess and bile leakage), and post-operative hospital stay were retrospectively compared between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were no significant differences in the perioperative general status between the two groups (P>0.05). Both the duration of operation [(121.5±22.1) min vs. (190.9±48.9) min, P 0.05]. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nOcclusion of hepatic vascular inflow and outflow combined with retrograde left hemihepatectomy was safe and feasibly. The retrograde approach was superior to the antegrade approach in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nLaparoscopes; Hepatectomy; Retrograde; Antegrade\",\"PeriodicalId\":10021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华肝胆外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"815-818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华肝胆外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2019.11.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝胆外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2019.11.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较腹腔镜左半肝切除术中逆行和顺行技术的安全性和有效性。方法2016年1月至2018年6月在宁波市李惠利医学中心医院接受腹腔镜左半肝切除术的65例患者中,31例进行了逆行左半肝手术,34例进行了顺行左半肝术。回顾性比较两组的围手术期数据、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症(包括大出血、腹腔脓肿和胆汁渗漏)和术后住院时间。结果两组围手术期总体情况无显著性差异(P>0.05),手术时间[(121.5±22.1)minvs.(190.9±48.9)min]。腹腔镜左半肝切除术中逆行入路优于顺行入路。关键词:腹腔镜;肝切除术;逆行;顺行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study on two different techniques in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of the retrograde and the antegrade techniques in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. Methods Of the 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy between January 2016 to June 2018 at the Ningbo Li Huili Hospital of Medical Center, retrograde left hemihepatectomy was carried out in 31 patients, and antegrade left hemihepatectomy in 34 patients. The perioperative data, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications (including major bleeding, abdominal abscess and bile leakage), and post-operative hospital stay were retrospectively compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in the perioperative general status between the two groups (P>0.05). Both the duration of operation [(121.5±22.1) min vs. (190.9±48.9) min, P 0.05]. Conclusions Occlusion of hepatic vascular inflow and outflow combined with retrograde left hemihepatectomy was safe and feasibly. The retrograde approach was superior to the antegrade approach in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. Key words: Laparoscopes; Hepatectomy; Retrograde; Antegrade
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华肝胆外科杂志
中华肝胆外科杂志 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7101
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association and supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, founded in 1995. The journal has the following columns: review, hot spotlight, academic thinking, thesis, experimental research, short thesis, case report, synthesis, etc. The journal has been recognized by Beida Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences). Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery has been included in famous databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Source Journals of China Science Citation Database (with Extended Version) and so on, and it is one of the national key academic journals under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic efficacy of external and internal-external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice Combined postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein chemotherapy to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis: a meta-analysis Retrograde approach to the retroperitoneal Castleman disease: a case report and literature review Application of laparoscopy in liver metastasis of colorectal cancer Hepatic biloma after minimally invasive interventional therapies: treatment and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1