马克·吐温与矛盾的自然隐喻

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN Mark Twain Annual Pub Date : 2019-10-24 DOI:10.5325/marktwaij.17.1.0129
J. Bird
{"title":"马克·吐温与矛盾的自然隐喻","authors":"J. Bird","doi":"10.5325/marktwaij.17.1.0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In 1978, William Rueckert coined the term “ecocriticism,” defining it as “the application of ecology and ecological concepts to the study of literature.” He proposed three postulates about literature, which are all metaphors. Taking a cue from Rueckert, this article examines the metaphorical nature of Mark Twain’s nature writing, looking at the way his works function as stored energy, as energy pathways, and as both fossil fuel and renewable resources, using passages from The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, “Old Times on the Mississippi,” and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Unlike Rueckert’s rather sunny postulates, this article sees a darker side in Twain’s works, a recognition that is revealed in his conflicted metaphors of nature. Just as Samuel Clemens and Mark Twain have long been considered divided, we as humans are divided: we are both a part of and apart from nature, a bifurcation and conflict that is contained in Twain’s metaphorical language.","PeriodicalId":41060,"journal":{"name":"Mark Twain Annual","volume":"17 1","pages":"129 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mark Twain and the Conflicted Metaphor of Nature\",\"authors\":\"J. Bird\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/marktwaij.17.1.0129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In 1978, William Rueckert coined the term “ecocriticism,” defining it as “the application of ecology and ecological concepts to the study of literature.” He proposed three postulates about literature, which are all metaphors. Taking a cue from Rueckert, this article examines the metaphorical nature of Mark Twain’s nature writing, looking at the way his works function as stored energy, as energy pathways, and as both fossil fuel and renewable resources, using passages from The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, “Old Times on the Mississippi,” and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Unlike Rueckert’s rather sunny postulates, this article sees a darker side in Twain’s works, a recognition that is revealed in his conflicted metaphors of nature. Just as Samuel Clemens and Mark Twain have long been considered divided, we as humans are divided: we are both a part of and apart from nature, a bifurcation and conflict that is contained in Twain’s metaphorical language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mark Twain Annual\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mark Twain Annual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/marktwaij.17.1.0129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mark Twain Annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/marktwaij.17.1.0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:1978年,William Rueckert创造了“生态批评”一词,将其定义为“生态学和生态学概念在文学研究中的应用”。他提出了关于文学的三个假设,这些假设都是隐喻。这篇文章借鉴了吕克特的观点,利用《汤姆·索耶历险记》、《密西西比河上的旧时光》和《哈克贝里·费恩历险记》中的段落,考察了马克·吐温自然写作的隐喻性,考察了他的作品作为储存能量、能源途径以及化石燃料和可再生资源的功能。与吕克特相当乐观的假设不同,这篇文章在吐温的作品中看到了黑暗的一面,这一认识在他对自然的矛盾隐喻中得到了体现。正如塞缪尔·克莱门斯和马克·吐温长期以来被认为是分裂的一样,我们人类也是分裂的:我们既是自然的一部分,又与自然分离,吐温的隐喻语言中包含着分歧和冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mark Twain and the Conflicted Metaphor of Nature
Abstract:In 1978, William Rueckert coined the term “ecocriticism,” defining it as “the application of ecology and ecological concepts to the study of literature.” He proposed three postulates about literature, which are all metaphors. Taking a cue from Rueckert, this article examines the metaphorical nature of Mark Twain’s nature writing, looking at the way his works function as stored energy, as energy pathways, and as both fossil fuel and renewable resources, using passages from The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, “Old Times on the Mississippi,” and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Unlike Rueckert’s rather sunny postulates, this article sees a darker side in Twain’s works, a recognition that is revealed in his conflicted metaphors of nature. Just as Samuel Clemens and Mark Twain have long been considered divided, we as humans are divided: we are both a part of and apart from nature, a bifurcation and conflict that is contained in Twain’s metaphorical language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mark Twain Annual
Mark Twain Annual LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Mark Twain Annual publishes articles related to Mark Twain and those who surrounded him and serves as an outlet for new scholarship as well as new pedagogical approaches. It is the official publication of the Mark Twain Circle of America, an international association of people interested in the life and work of Mark Twain. The Circle encourages interest in Mark Twain and fosters the formal presentation of ideas about the author and his work, as well as the informal exchange of information among its members.
期刊最新文献
Studying Mark Twain’s The Diaries of Adam and Eve from a Ghanaian Context Susy Clemens: The Final Years The Stakes of Stormfield: On Mark Twain’s Vision of Heaven Critical Insights: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer Why I Still Teach Mark Twain in the Twenty-first-Century Indian Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1