瘸腿混合期货

Nina Mühlemann, Celestina Widmer, Y. Schmidt
{"title":"瘸腿混合期货","authors":"Nina Mühlemann, Celestina Widmer, Y. Schmidt","doi":"10.1080/14794713.2022.2162279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this collaboratively written article, we argue that disabled performers have long since questioned notions about physicality, subjectivity, temporality and spectatorship on stage that are currently being revisited in the debate on ‘hybrid’ theatre practices during the pandemic. Disability performances, as well as hybrid theatre formats, which are now booming due to the lockdown experience, provoke discussions and discursive negotiations about what theatre is, should be and for whom, and explore boundaries of the art form. Based on these arguments, we will examine the concept of hybridity, in order to critically explore the debate on hybrid theatre in relation to disability performance practices, using the examples of the internationally recognised performing artists Neil Marcus and Sins Invalid, and challenge notions of sustainability within that discourse. We end by asking what demands a hybrid future would need to meet to accommodate the diverse realities of non-normative bodyminds.","PeriodicalId":38661,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cripping hybrid futures\",\"authors\":\"Nina Mühlemann, Celestina Widmer, Y. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14794713.2022.2162279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this collaboratively written article, we argue that disabled performers have long since questioned notions about physicality, subjectivity, temporality and spectatorship on stage that are currently being revisited in the debate on ‘hybrid’ theatre practices during the pandemic. Disability performances, as well as hybrid theatre formats, which are now booming due to the lockdown experience, provoke discussions and discursive negotiations about what theatre is, should be and for whom, and explore boundaries of the art form. Based on these arguments, we will examine the concept of hybridity, in order to critically explore the debate on hybrid theatre in relation to disability performance practices, using the examples of the internationally recognised performing artists Neil Marcus and Sins Invalid, and challenge notions of sustainability within that discourse. We end by asking what demands a hybrid future would need to meet to accommodate the diverse realities of non-normative bodyminds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2022.2162279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2022.2162279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在这篇合作撰写的文章中,我们认为,残疾演员长期以来一直对舞台上的身体性、主观性、时间性和观众性的概念提出质疑,而在疫情期间关于“混合”戏剧实践的辩论中,这些概念正被重新审视。残疾表演,以及由于封锁经历而蓬勃发展的混合戏剧形式,引发了关于戏剧是什么、应该是什么以及为谁服务的讨论和讨论性谈判,并探索了艺术形式的边界。基于这些论点,我们将研究混合性的概念,以国际公认的表演艺术家Neil Marcus和Sins Invalid为例,批判性地探讨关于混合戏剧与残疾表演实践的辩论,并在这一讨论中挑战可持续性的概念。我们最后要问的是,一个混合型的未来需要满足什么样的要求,才能适应非规范性身心的不同现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cripping hybrid futures
ABSTRACT In this collaboratively written article, we argue that disabled performers have long since questioned notions about physicality, subjectivity, temporality and spectatorship on stage that are currently being revisited in the debate on ‘hybrid’ theatre practices during the pandemic. Disability performances, as well as hybrid theatre formats, which are now booming due to the lockdown experience, provoke discussions and discursive negotiations about what theatre is, should be and for whom, and explore boundaries of the art form. Based on these arguments, we will examine the concept of hybridity, in order to critically explore the debate on hybrid theatre in relation to disability performance practices, using the examples of the internationally recognised performing artists Neil Marcus and Sins Invalid, and challenge notions of sustainability within that discourse. We end by asking what demands a hybrid future would need to meet to accommodate the diverse realities of non-normative bodyminds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media
International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Live performance in digital environments The Nāṭyaśāstra and virtual metatheatre Ambiguous devices as an example of a networked relational encounter Exploring the impact of machine learning on dance performance: a systematic review ‘Tele_Trust’ and ‘Touch My Touch’: co-creating social touch and trust experience through telematic platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1