当涉及亲密关系时,最好在网上询问?关系质量评估中的调查模式差异

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Demographic Research Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.4054/demres.2023.48.22
Almut Schumann, Detlev Lück
{"title":"当涉及亲密关系时,最好在网上询问?关系质量评估中的调查模式差异","authors":"Almut Schumann, Detlev Lück","doi":"10.4054/demres.2023.48.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND The assessment of relationship quality is a key construct in family research and relies on several indicators. As answer behavior for sensitive and subjective questions can be biased by the interview situation, the emerging switch from face-to-face mode to web or mixed mode in surveys challenges the comparability of measurements. OBJECTIVE This study investigates the impact of two modes of data collection – face-to-face mode and web mode – on central measurements of relationship quality in quantitative family research. METHODS In a German experimental pilot study (2018) within the Generations and Gender Programme, target persons were randomly assigned to face-to-face or online interviews. Mode differences are assessed by comparing distributions for various indicators of relationship quality. To adjust for confounders, post-stratification weighting and multivariate regression analysis are applied.","PeriodicalId":48242,"journal":{"name":"Demographic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better to ask online when it concerns intimate relationships? Survey mode differences in the assessment of relationship quality\",\"authors\":\"Almut Schumann, Detlev Lück\",\"doi\":\"10.4054/demres.2023.48.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND The assessment of relationship quality is a key construct in family research and relies on several indicators. As answer behavior for sensitive and subjective questions can be biased by the interview situation, the emerging switch from face-to-face mode to web or mixed mode in surveys challenges the comparability of measurements. OBJECTIVE This study investigates the impact of two modes of data collection – face-to-face mode and web mode – on central measurements of relationship quality in quantitative family research. METHODS In a German experimental pilot study (2018) within the Generations and Gender Programme, target persons were randomly assigned to face-to-face or online interviews. Mode differences are assessed by comparing distributions for various indicators of relationship quality. To adjust for confounders, post-stratification weighting and multivariate regression analysis are applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Demographic Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Demographic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2023.48.22\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demographic Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2023.48.22","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭关系质量评价是家庭研究的重要内容,它依赖于几个指标。由于敏感和主观问题的回答行为会受到采访情况的影响,调查中出现的从面对面模式到网络或混合模式的转变对测量结果的可比性提出了挑战。目的探讨定量家庭研究中面对面和网络两种数据收集模式对关系质量中心测量的影响。方法在德国世代与性别项目的一项实验性试点研究(2018年)中,目标人群被随机分配到面对面或在线访谈中。通过比较各种关系质量指标的分布来评估模式差异。为了调整混杂因素,应用分层后加权和多元回归分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Better to ask online when it concerns intimate relationships? Survey mode differences in the assessment of relationship quality
BACKGROUND The assessment of relationship quality is a key construct in family research and relies on several indicators. As answer behavior for sensitive and subjective questions can be biased by the interview situation, the emerging switch from face-to-face mode to web or mixed mode in surveys challenges the comparability of measurements. OBJECTIVE This study investigates the impact of two modes of data collection – face-to-face mode and web mode – on central measurements of relationship quality in quantitative family research. METHODS In a German experimental pilot study (2018) within the Generations and Gender Programme, target persons were randomly assigned to face-to-face or online interviews. Mode differences are assessed by comparing distributions for various indicators of relationship quality. To adjust for confounders, post-stratification weighting and multivariate regression analysis are applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Demographic Research
Demographic Research DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Demographic Research is a free, online, open access, peer-reviewed journal of the population sciences published by the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, Germany. The journal pioneers an expedited review system. Contributions can generally be published within one month after final acceptance.
期刊最新文献
How do environmental stressors influence migration? A meta-regression analysis of environmental migration literature Lives saved, lives lost, and under-reported COVID-19 deaths: Excess and non-excess mortality in relation to cause-specific mortality during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden Bayesian implementation of Rogers–Castro model migration schedules: An alternative technique for parameter estimation The formal demography of kinship V: Kin loss, bereavement, and causes of death Programmatic access to open statistical data for population studies: The SDMX standard
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1