在中美环境下培养教师专业精神:背景、标准和人格

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Inquiry Pub Date : 2021-07-12 DOI:10.1080/20004508.2021.1950274
L.B. Liu, J. Conner, Q. Li
{"title":"在中美环境下培养教师专业精神:背景、标准和人格","authors":"L.B. Liu, J. Conner, Q. Li","doi":"10.1080/20004508.2021.1950274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Our global era invites research on teacher reflection that is grounded in local contexts and enriched by cross-regional collaborations. Teacher professionalism is a shared global interest that is shaped by unique cultural factors in local settings. This study examines Chinese and U.S. undergraduate teacher education student views on the criteria for and standardised measures used to assess teacher professionalism. Data analyses of participant products, specifically group rubrics and individual reflections, involved constant comparative analyses to highlight convergent and divergent themes in student conceptions of teacher professionalism within and across the U.S. and Chinese university contexts. Findings demonstrate similarities and distinctions across participant views on the professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions involved in becoming a teacher, and reveals teacher professionalism as a dialectic among contexts, standards, and persons. Context distinguishes professional practice in ways that bring meaning and relevancy to local student needs. Standards provide a shared foundation for global discourse around key elements of a profession. Maintaining a person-centred view helps ensure assessment practices keep education’s broader civic goals central. Engaging in international dialogue on the meaning of teacher professionalism across regional cultures expanded understandings of professionalism, and how it may be fostered and evaluated more effectively in teacher education.","PeriodicalId":37203,"journal":{"name":"Education Inquiry","volume":"14 1","pages":"22 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950274","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultivating teacher professionalism in Chinese and U.S. settings: contexts, standards, and personhood\",\"authors\":\"L.B. Liu, J. Conner, Q. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20004508.2021.1950274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Our global era invites research on teacher reflection that is grounded in local contexts and enriched by cross-regional collaborations. Teacher professionalism is a shared global interest that is shaped by unique cultural factors in local settings. This study examines Chinese and U.S. undergraduate teacher education student views on the criteria for and standardised measures used to assess teacher professionalism. Data analyses of participant products, specifically group rubrics and individual reflections, involved constant comparative analyses to highlight convergent and divergent themes in student conceptions of teacher professionalism within and across the U.S. and Chinese university contexts. Findings demonstrate similarities and distinctions across participant views on the professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions involved in becoming a teacher, and reveals teacher professionalism as a dialectic among contexts, standards, and persons. Context distinguishes professional practice in ways that bring meaning and relevancy to local student needs. Standards provide a shared foundation for global discourse around key elements of a profession. Maintaining a person-centred view helps ensure assessment practices keep education’s broader civic goals central. Engaging in international dialogue on the meaning of teacher professionalism across regional cultures expanded understandings of professionalism, and how it may be fostered and evaluated more effectively in teacher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950274\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们的全球化时代要求对教师反思的研究立足于地方背景,并通过跨区域合作丰富。教师专业精神是一种全球共同利益,受到当地独特文化因素的影响。本研究考察了中国和美国本科师范教育学生对教师专业精神评估标准和标准化措施的看法。参与者产品的数据分析,特别是群体规则和个人反思,涉及持续的比较分析,以突出在美国和中国大学背景下学生对教师专业主义概念的趋同和不同主题。研究结果显示了参与者对成为一名教师所涉及的专业知识、技能和性格的看法的异同,并揭示了教师专业主义是背景、标准和个人之间的辩证关系。情境将专业实践区分开来,为当地学生的需求带来意义和相关性。标准为围绕专业关键要素的全球讨论提供了一个共享的基础。保持以人为本的观点有助于确保评估实践以教育更广泛的公民目标为中心。参与跨区域文化教师专业精神意义的国际对话,扩大了对专业精神的理解,以及如何在教师教育中更有效地培养和评估专业精神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cultivating teacher professionalism in Chinese and U.S. settings: contexts, standards, and personhood
ABSTRACT Our global era invites research on teacher reflection that is grounded in local contexts and enriched by cross-regional collaborations. Teacher professionalism is a shared global interest that is shaped by unique cultural factors in local settings. This study examines Chinese and U.S. undergraduate teacher education student views on the criteria for and standardised measures used to assess teacher professionalism. Data analyses of participant products, specifically group rubrics and individual reflections, involved constant comparative analyses to highlight convergent and divergent themes in student conceptions of teacher professionalism within and across the U.S. and Chinese university contexts. Findings demonstrate similarities and distinctions across participant views on the professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions involved in becoming a teacher, and reveals teacher professionalism as a dialectic among contexts, standards, and persons. Context distinguishes professional practice in ways that bring meaning and relevancy to local student needs. Standards provide a shared foundation for global discourse around key elements of a profession. Maintaining a person-centred view helps ensure assessment practices keep education’s broader civic goals central. Engaging in international dialogue on the meaning of teacher professionalism across regional cultures expanded understandings of professionalism, and how it may be fostered and evaluated more effectively in teacher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education Inquiry
Education Inquiry Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Transforming Nordic early childhood education and care in times of marketisation, privatisation and commercialisation Police education reform in Iceland: examining the legitimating principles, contradictions, and tensions in policy discourse Describing teacher educators’ metatalk moves enacted for teaching how to teach concepts Newly qualified secondary school teachers’ perspectives on workplace learning Status beliefs negatively affect expected university attainment of lower class students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1