{"title":"根据碳足迹选择南欧葡萄酒","authors":"Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis , Zoi-Panagiota Kryona , Nestor Tsirliganis","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The largest wine producers globally are located in Southern Europe and climate is a major factor in wine production. The European Union aims to complement the consumer’s choice for wine with information about environmental sustainability. The carbon footprint is a worldwide-standardized indicator that both wine producers and consumers perceive as the most important environmental indicator. So far, environmental life cycle assessment studies show variability in the system boundaries design and functional unit selection, and review papers do not include life cycle inventory data, and consider vineyards in various locations worldwide. This study aimed to investigate what are the key factors affecting the carbon footprint of red and white wine production in South European countries with the same climatic conditions, and benchmark both wine types. The results showed that the carbon footprints of white and red wines are comparable. The average carbon footprints were 1.02, 1.25, and 1.62 CO<sub>2</sub> eq. bottle of wine <sup>−1</sup> for organic red wine, conventional red wine, and conventional white wine, respectively. The viticulture, winemaking, and packaging stages affect greatly the carbon footprint. Diesel consumption at the viticulture stage, electricity consumption at the viticulture and winemaking stages, and glass production at the packaging stage are the largest contributors to the carbon footprint. Wine consumption stage was omitted from most studies, even though it can increase the carbon footprint by 5%. Our results suggest that consumers should choose (conventional or organic) red wine that is produced locally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916122000214/pdfft?md5=c6e75b31c5944cfff79d59b80f61089c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916122000214-main.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selecting south European wine based on carbon footprint\",\"authors\":\"Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis , Zoi-Panagiota Kryona , Nestor Tsirliganis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The largest wine producers globally are located in Southern Europe and climate is a major factor in wine production. The European Union aims to complement the consumer’s choice for wine with information about environmental sustainability. The carbon footprint is a worldwide-standardized indicator that both wine producers and consumers perceive as the most important environmental indicator. So far, environmental life cycle assessment studies show variability in the system boundaries design and functional unit selection, and review papers do not include life cycle inventory data, and consider vineyards in various locations worldwide. This study aimed to investigate what are the key factors affecting the carbon footprint of red and white wine production in South European countries with the same climatic conditions, and benchmark both wine types. The results showed that the carbon footprints of white and red wines are comparable. The average carbon footprints were 1.02, 1.25, and 1.62 CO<sub>2</sub> eq. bottle of wine <sup>−1</sup> for organic red wine, conventional red wine, and conventional white wine, respectively. The viticulture, winemaking, and packaging stages affect greatly the carbon footprint. Diesel consumption at the viticulture stage, electricity consumption at the viticulture and winemaking stages, and glass production at the packaging stage are the largest contributors to the carbon footprint. Wine consumption stage was omitted from most studies, even though it can increase the carbon footprint by 5%. Our results suggest that consumers should choose (conventional or organic) red wine that is produced locally.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916122000214/pdfft?md5=c6e75b31c5944cfff79d59b80f61089c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916122000214-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916122000214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916122000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
全球最大的葡萄酒生产商位于南欧,气候是影响葡萄酒生产的一个主要因素。欧盟的目标是为消费者选择葡萄酒提供环境可持续性的信息。碳足迹是一个全球标准化的指标,葡萄酒生产商和消费者都认为这是最重要的环境指标。到目前为止,环境生命周期评估研究显示了系统边界设计和功能单元选择的可变性,并且综述论文没有包括生命周期库存数据,并且考虑了世界各地的葡萄园。本研究旨在探讨在相同气候条件下影响南欧国家红葡萄酒和白葡萄酒生产碳足迹的关键因素,并对两种葡萄酒类型进行基准测试。结果表明,白葡萄酒和红葡萄酒的碳足迹是相当的。有机红酒、常规红酒和常规白葡萄酒的平均碳足迹分别为1.02、1.25和1.62 CO2 /瓶(−1)。葡萄栽培、酿酒和包装阶段对碳足迹影响很大。葡萄栽培阶段的柴油消耗、葡萄栽培和酿酒阶段的电力消耗以及包装阶段的玻璃生产是碳足迹的最大贡献者。大多数研究忽略了葡萄酒消费阶段,尽管它可以增加5%的碳足迹。我们的研究结果表明,消费者应该选择(传统的或有机的)当地生产的红葡萄酒。
Selecting south European wine based on carbon footprint
The largest wine producers globally are located in Southern Europe and climate is a major factor in wine production. The European Union aims to complement the consumer’s choice for wine with information about environmental sustainability. The carbon footprint is a worldwide-standardized indicator that both wine producers and consumers perceive as the most important environmental indicator. So far, environmental life cycle assessment studies show variability in the system boundaries design and functional unit selection, and review papers do not include life cycle inventory data, and consider vineyards in various locations worldwide. This study aimed to investigate what are the key factors affecting the carbon footprint of red and white wine production in South European countries with the same climatic conditions, and benchmark both wine types. The results showed that the carbon footprints of white and red wines are comparable. The average carbon footprints were 1.02, 1.25, and 1.62 CO2 eq. bottle of wine −1 for organic red wine, conventional red wine, and conventional white wine, respectively. The viticulture, winemaking, and packaging stages affect greatly the carbon footprint. Diesel consumption at the viticulture stage, electricity consumption at the viticulture and winemaking stages, and glass production at the packaging stage are the largest contributors to the carbon footprint. Wine consumption stage was omitted from most studies, even though it can increase the carbon footprint by 5%. Our results suggest that consumers should choose (conventional or organic) red wine that is produced locally.