{"title":"宪法法院判例法对哥伦比亚立法进程的影响","authors":"Y. Caicedo","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V11.2481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Colombia, the substantive contents of statutes have started to feed on interpretations, recommendations and commandments given by the Constitutional Court in its decisions. However, this statement cannot be extended to procedural requirements in such a clear way. The purpose of this essay is to determine some precedents about the legislative process, and to begin a reflection about the reasons why the Colombian Constitutional Court’s rules have not been able to fully impact the procedural activity of the Colombian legislator, yet.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"11 1","pages":"53-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La influencia de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional en el proceso legislativo en Colombia\",\"authors\":\"Y. Caicedo\",\"doi\":\"10.18046/PREC.V11.2481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Colombia, the substantive contents of statutes have started to feed on interpretations, recommendations and commandments given by the Constitutional Court in its decisions. However, this statement cannot be extended to procedural requirements in such a clear way. The purpose of this essay is to determine some precedents about the legislative process, and to begin a reflection about the reasons why the Colombian Constitutional Court’s rules have not been able to fully impact the procedural activity of the Colombian legislator, yet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precedente\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"53-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precedente\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V11.2481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precedente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V11.2481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
La influencia de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional en el proceso legislativo en Colombia
In Colombia, the substantive contents of statutes have started to feed on interpretations, recommendations and commandments given by the Constitutional Court in its decisions. However, this statement cannot be extended to procedural requirements in such a clear way. The purpose of this essay is to determine some precedents about the legislative process, and to begin a reflection about the reasons why the Colombian Constitutional Court’s rules have not been able to fully impact the procedural activity of the Colombian legislator, yet.