Herwin Andrés Corzo Laverde, Sara Chaves Gómez, Juan David Jaramillo Manzano, Nathally Caicedo Ardila, Paula Cerón Arboleda
El presente texto surge como respuesta a la siguiente pregunta: ¿cuál es el papel de los conceptos jurídicos en relación con los debates éticos que cruzan el uso del derecho? Para ello, se tomará como caso de estudio el derecho a la muerte digna en el contexto jurídico colombiano. A través de un análisis textual de normas jurídicas y documentos con pretensiones teórico-jurídicas, se mostrará que los ejercicios de definición conceptual en el ámbito del derecho responden a la operacionalización desde valoraciones éticas hacia el instrumental jurídico; posteriormente, se ejemplificará este proceso a través del uso específico de este hecho por una postura ética, decididamente comprometida con el derecho a la muerte digna, en el contexto constitucional colombiano. Para esto, se propondrán ejemplos de autores y corporaciones que sostienen una mirada negativa sobre la eutanasia. Se mostrará, así, que es preciso asumir la mediación de los conceptos jurídicos respecto a los juicios valorativos y operacionalizar los contenidos jurídicos, para que correspondan con la ética de la autonomía y la muerte digna.
{"title":"Conceptualización jurídica en tanto mediación ética: el caso del derecho a la muerte digna en Colombia","authors":"Herwin Andrés Corzo Laverde, Sara Chaves Gómez, Juan David Jaramillo Manzano, Nathally Caicedo Ardila, Paula Cerón Arboleda","doi":"10.18046/prec.v23.6054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v23.6054","url":null,"abstract":"El presente texto surge como respuesta a la siguiente pregunta: ¿cuál es el papel de los conceptos jurídicos en relación con los debates éticos que cruzan el uso del derecho? Para ello, se tomará como caso de estudio el derecho a la muerte digna en el contexto jurídico colombiano. A través de un análisis textual de normas jurídicas y documentos con pretensiones teórico-jurídicas, se mostrará que los ejercicios de definición conceptual en el ámbito del derecho responden a la operacionalización desde valoraciones éticas hacia el instrumental jurídico; posteriormente, se ejemplificará este proceso a través del uso específico de este hecho por una postura ética, decididamente comprometida con el derecho a la muerte digna, en el contexto constitucional colombiano. Para esto, se propondrán ejemplos de autores y corporaciones que sostienen una mirada negativa sobre la eutanasia. Se mostrará, así, que es preciso asumir la mediación de los conceptos jurídicos respecto a los juicios valorativos y operacionalizar los contenidos jurídicos, para que correspondan con la ética de la autonomía y la muerte digna.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136283551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Vega, Diana Espino Pérez, Vanessa Rischmoller Vargas
Before 2014, Peru had never been a common destination country for migrants and refugees. However, the exodus of people coming from Venezuela would lead the country to become the second in the world to receive this population in absolute numbers, with 830 000 as of July 2020 (Bahar et al., 2020, p. 9). Although at the beginning the State decided to adopt an open-door policy regarding the entry and permanence of Venezuelans, since mid-2018 migration control has become more restrictive. This situation has become even more adverse for them since the beginning of the pandemic of COVID-19, as they have had to go through situations of discrimination, despite its condition of especial vulnerability. Given this scenario, this article will examine certain actions and omissions carried out by the State, which reveal violations of human rights of these people, fostered by a public opinion of rejection towards them. Finally, the importance of developing citizen awareness actions questioning these perceptions and encouraging social inclusion will also be analyzed.
{"title":"Población venezolana en Perú en tiempos de COVID-19: luchar contra la adversidad para lograr la inclusión social.","authors":"M. Vega, Diana Espino Pérez, Vanessa Rischmoller Vargas","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V19.4654","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V19.4654","url":null,"abstract":"Before 2014, Peru had never been a common destination country for migrants and refugees. However, the exodus of people coming from Venezuela would lead the country to become the second in the world to receive this population in absolute numbers, with 830 000 as of July 2020 (Bahar et al., 2020, p. 9). Although at the beginning the State decided to adopt an open-door policy regarding the entry and permanence of Venezuelans, since mid-2018 migration control has become more restrictive. This situation has become even more adverse for them since the beginning of the pandemic of COVID-19, as they have had to go through situations of discrimination, despite its condition of especial vulnerability. Given this scenario, this article will examine certain actions and omissions carried out by the State, which reveal violations of human rights of these people, fostered by a public opinion of rejection towards them. Finally, the importance of developing citizen awareness actions questioning these perceptions and encouraging social inclusion will also be analyzed.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"19 1","pages":"9-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42562079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
El constitucionalismo comparado ha surgido después de la Guerra Fría como una herramienta importante para las transiciones democráticas y la consolidación de la paz. Sin embargo, los enfoques tradicionales no proporcionan explicaciones plausibles para nuevos fenómenos como la globalización y el diálogo entre tribunales. A pesar del resurgimiento del campo, el constitucionalismo comparado enfrenta desafíos relacionados con la selección de casos y la ambivalencia hacia las ciencias sociales. Este artículo hace referencia al debate básico sobre los propósitos y desafíos del derecho constitucional comparado moderno. La idea principal es que el estudio del constitucionalismo debe estrechar lazos con las ciencias sociales para construir un derecho constitucional comparado pluralista.
{"title":"¿Por qué comparar? Propósitos y desafíos del derecho constitucional comparado en el siglo XXI","authors":"María Dolores Collazos","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V18.4568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V18.4568","url":null,"abstract":"El constitucionalismo comparado ha surgido después de la Guerra Fría como una herramienta importante para las transiciones democráticas y la consolidación de la paz. Sin embargo, los enfoques tradicionales no proporcionan explicaciones plausibles para nuevos fenómenos como la globalización y el diálogo entre tribunales. A pesar del resurgimiento del campo, el constitucionalismo comparado enfrenta desafíos relacionados con la selección de casos y la ambivalencia hacia las ciencias sociales. Este artículo hace referencia al debate básico sobre los propósitos y desafíos del derecho constitucional comparado moderno. La idea principal es que el estudio del constitucionalismo debe estrechar lazos con las ciencias sociales para construir un derecho constitucional comparado pluralista.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"18 1","pages":"11-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48174187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Niccolo Machiavelli is the father of modern constitutionalism. Constitutionalism began anew in the modern world with the study of the ancient republics and it was Machiavelli who inaugurated this revived science of politics. Five hundred years after the composition of Il principe and the Discorsi we are still working out the implications of applying reason to the structures of law and government in pursuit of justice and the common good. Modern constitutionalism and ancient republicanism share three central beliefs: first, that government should serve justice and the common good; second, that government should do so through known and stable laws; third, that these will best be secured through the checks and balances of a well-designed constitution. Machiavelli took the theories and experiences of republican Rome and applied them to his own era. This application of reason to constitutional design transformed the politics of emergent modernity and reconfigured government throughout the world.
{"title":"Nicolás Maquiavelo: padre del constitucionalismo moderno","authors":"Juan David Almeyda Sarmiento","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V18.4578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V18.4578","url":null,"abstract":"Niccolo Machiavelli is the father of modern constitutionalism. Constitutionalism began anew in the modern world with the study of the ancient republics and it was Machiavelli who inaugurated this revived science of politics. Five hundred years after the composition of Il principe and the Discorsi we are still working out the implications of applying reason to the structures of law and government in pursuit of justice and the common good. Modern constitutionalism and ancient republicanism share three central beliefs: first, that government should serve justice and the common good; second, that government should do so through known and stable laws; third, that these will best be secured through the checks and balances of a well-designed constitution. Machiavelli took the theories and experiences of republican Rome and applied them to his own era. This application of reason to constitutional design transformed the politics of emergent modernity and reconfigured government throughout the world.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"18 1","pages":"199-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44685806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Con la Ley 1819 de 2016 se introdujo a la legislación colombiana modificaciones al tratamiento tributario de los contratos de leasing financiero y operativo. En este documento se presentan problemas jurídicos derivados de la nueva configuración tributaria del leasing financiero en el impuesto sobre la renta e IVA, originados en la redacción e interpretación del artículo 127-1 del estatuto. El presente documento se desarrolla bajo la metodología de investigación dogmática, parte del análisis de la legislación colombiana y tiene como insumo importante la investigación de la doctrina emitida por la DIAN como fuente auxiliar, relevante para entender el alcance de esta norma.
{"title":"Análisis jurídico de la tributación de los contratos de leasing financiero en la legislación colombiana a partir de los cambios introducidos por la Ley 1819 de 2016","authors":"Max Sebastián Murillo Taborda","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V18.4575","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V18.4575","url":null,"abstract":"Con la Ley 1819 de 2016 se introdujo a la legislación colombiana modificaciones al tratamiento tributario de los contratos de leasing financiero y operativo. En este documento se presentan problemas jurídicos derivados de la nueva configuración tributaria del leasing financiero en el impuesto sobre la renta e IVA, originados en la redacción e interpretación del artículo 127-1 del estatuto. El presente documento se desarrolla bajo la metodología de investigación dogmática, parte del análisis de la legislación colombiana y tiene como insumo importante la investigación de la doctrina emitida por la DIAN como fuente auxiliar, relevante para entender el alcance de esta norma.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"18 1","pages":"93-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41912280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This document attempts to reflect critically on the function of alternative legal education as a pillar of the clinical method, from a broad contextual hindsight of the global phenomenon of COVID-19 and its nationwide impacts, and how it demonstrates the real disability of the rule of law to extend social justice around the whole popular corpus This argument affirms the need to decolonize the law as a reproducer of coloniality of being, of knowledge and power The working method is as follows First, it is proposed as a prelude to an invitation to overcome the legal-centric or traditionalist views of law that have not questioned the reproductive function of crisis on behalf of the modern/colonial/capitalist state The backbone category of hidden people allows to understand that the discrimination and social exclusion aggravated by COVID-19 are crossed by racism, as a result of coloniality These backbone categories (racism and coloniality) are built as explanatory pillars of the double exception state phenomena, that emerges in peripheral areas of the country In this scenario, our goal is trying to clarify the importance of the socio-legal, clinical method and the fundamental objects of its implementation from an integral, social and solidary point of view The objective is proposing as a horizon the necessity of rethinking the clinic method with the integration of other knowledge that enrich the juridic education in context and that allows the use of traditional tools of public interest law as inputs for a counter-hegemonic fight, capable of fracturing the structural matrix of coloniality
{"title":"Repensar la praxis sociojurídica a propósito de la emergencia sanitaria, social y económica por COVID-19","authors":"Laura Marcela Martínez Mejía, M. A. Ramírez","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V18.4570","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V18.4570","url":null,"abstract":"This document attempts to reflect critically on the function of alternative legal education as a pillar of the clinical method, from a broad contextual hindsight of the global phenomenon of COVID-19 and its nationwide impacts, and how it demonstrates the real disability of the rule of law to extend social justice around the whole popular corpus This argument affirms the need to decolonize the law as a reproducer of coloniality of being, of knowledge and power The working method is as follows First, it is proposed as a prelude to an invitation to overcome the legal-centric or traditionalist views of law that have not questioned the reproductive function of crisis on behalf of the modern/colonial/capitalist state The backbone category of hidden people allows to understand that the discrimination and social exclusion aggravated by COVID-19 are crossed by racism, as a result of coloniality These backbone categories (racism and coloniality) are built as explanatory pillars of the double exception state phenomena, that emerges in peripheral areas of the country In this scenario, our goal is trying to clarify the importance of the socio-legal, clinical method and the fundamental objects of its implementation from an integral, social and solidary point of view The objective is proposing as a horizon the necessity of rethinking the clinic method with the integration of other knowledge that enrich the juridic education in context and that allows the use of traditional tools of public interest law as inputs for a counter-hegemonic fight, capable of fracturing the structural matrix of coloniality","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"18 1","pages":"159-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45192106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This research analyzes the governance and administration of the Colombian district and national government, regarding the migratory and refugee crisis, within the framework of COVID-19. Based on clinical work and regulatory provisions, from the concept of invisibility, as well as the governance of migrations with a differential approach, it was examined the district and national government’s capacity to manage solutions facing COVID-19, towards population in need for international protection. Thus, in the face of late and inefficient responses, the absence of a differential approach that perpetuates the invisibility of the migratory crisis and of refugees in pandemic was evident.
{"title":"Nuevas invisibilizaciones estatales de un fenómeno conocido: gobernanza sin un enfoque diferencial en situaciones de emergencia","authors":"Andrea Galvis Malagón, Viviana Basto Vergara","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V18.4569","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V18.4569","url":null,"abstract":"This research analyzes the governance and administration of the Colombian district and national government, regarding the migratory and refugee crisis, within the framework of COVID-19. Based on clinical work and regulatory provisions, from the concept of invisibility, as well as the governance of migrations with a differential approach, it was examined the district and national government’s capacity to manage solutions facing COVID-19, towards population in need for international protection. Thus, in the face of late and inefficient responses, the absence of a differential approach that perpetuates the invisibility of the migratory crisis and of refugees in pandemic was evident.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"18 1","pages":"41-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41895967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paulina Rivera Ceballos, Santiago Rodríguez Chaves
A raíz de la pandemia causada por el COVID-19, ha surgido un fenómeno en materia de regularización de situaciones migratorias, específicamente en materia de expedición de los salvoconductos de permanencia (en adelante, salvoconducto SC2). Esto, debido a que con la expedición de la Resolución 1006 de 2020 se suspendió la emisión de salvoconductos SC2 por parte de la Unidad Administrativa Especial de Migración Colombia, lo que se convirtió en un impedimento parael acceso a la salud, puesto que en la legislación interna colombiana no está contemplada la afiliación al Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud con una constancia de salvoconducto SC2. De esta manera, por las decisiones tomadas por el Gobierno nacional, se ha generado una barrera administrativa para que la población solicitante de refugio pueda acceder a sus derechos fundamentales, puntualmente el derecho a la salud. Teniendo el cuenta lo mencionado, evidenciamos que a través de la figura administrativa del control inmediato de legalidad se puede lograr la protección de diversos derechos fundamentales de la población con necesidad de protección internacional que se encuentra en situación de vulnerabilidad por su contexto de movilización, como resultado del impedimento de la emisión de salvoconducto SC2, a raíz de la emergencia sanitaria, económica y social causada por el COVID-19. En este sentido, el control inmediato de legalidad es una herramienta de vigilancia ciudadana que permite considerar los efectos reales y materiales de una norma que es en principio legítima, pero que el Consejo de Estado no puede percibir a simple vista. Adicionalmente, es un límite a las funciones del Estado y de la Administración durante la vigencia del estado de excepción, que permite proteger poblaciones vulnerables, debido a que estos grupos históricamente se han visto relegados y perjudicados en la toma de decisiones, y más aun en la adopción de medidas durante los estados de excepción.
{"title":"La idoneidad del control inmediato de legalidad para la protección de poblaciones vulnerables en el marco de estados de excepción","authors":"Paulina Rivera Ceballos, Santiago Rodríguez Chaves","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V18.4576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V18.4576","url":null,"abstract":"A raíz de la pandemia causada por el COVID-19, ha surgido un fenómeno en materia de regularización de situaciones migratorias, específicamente en materia de expedición de los salvoconductos de permanencia (en adelante, salvoconducto SC2). Esto, debido a que con la expedición de la Resolución 1006 de 2020 se suspendió la emisión de salvoconductos SC2 por parte de la Unidad Administrativa Especial de Migración Colombia, lo que se convirtió en un impedimento parael acceso a la salud, puesto que en la legislación interna colombiana no está contemplada la afiliación al Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud con una constancia de salvoconducto SC2. De esta manera, por las decisiones tomadas por el Gobierno nacional, se ha generado una barrera administrativa para que la población solicitante de refugio pueda acceder a sus derechos fundamentales, puntualmente el derecho a la salud. \u0000Teniendo el cuenta lo mencionado, evidenciamos que a través de la figura administrativa del control inmediato de legalidad se puede lograr la protección de diversos derechos fundamentales de la población con necesidad de protección internacional que se encuentra en situación de vulnerabilidad por su contexto de movilización, como resultado del impedimento de la emisión de salvoconducto SC2, a raíz de la emergencia sanitaria, económica y social causada por el COVID-19. En este sentido, el control inmediato de legalidad es una herramienta de vigilancia ciudadana que permite considerar los efectos reales y materiales de una norma que es en principio legítima, pero que el Consejo de Estado no puede percibir a simple vista. Adicionalmente, es un límite a las funciones del Estado y de la Administración durante la vigencia del estado de excepción, que permite proteger poblaciones vulnerables, debido a que estos grupos históricamente se han visto relegados y perjudicados en la toma de decisiones, y más aun en la adopción de medidas durante los estados de excepción.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"18 1","pages":"67-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45767933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Governments of Colombia and the United States of America agreed that a specialized agency of the United States army would arrive in Colombia in June 2020, among other reasons, to join efforts in order to counter drug trafficking. However, the arrival of the American troops in Colombia is controversial for three main reasons: (i) the importance of the territory with regard to a state’s sovereignty; (ii) the fact that the Colombian Government did not fulfil a constitutional requirement concerning the mandatory Senate authorization regarding the transit of foreign troops; (iii) the belief that the American troops are in Colombia to carry out actions against the current Venezuelan Government led by president Nicolás Maduro. This article argues that military assistance is compatible with the UN Charter if requested by a state to cope with internal matters and is carried out according to the terms and conditions previously agreed upon. Even though there are several treaties that could justify 132 SOBERANÍA Y COOPERACIÓN INTERNACIONAL: ANÁLISIS CRÍTICO DE LA LLEGADA DE TROPAS ESTADOUNIDENSES A COLOMBIA DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA DEL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PRECEDENTE 2021 VOL. 18 / ENERO-JUNIO, 129-157. CALI – COLOMBIA the arrival of American troops in Colombia, the lack of consent expressed by the competent authority renders illegal their presence in Colombia. Nonetheless, based on the International Court of Justice jurisprudence, the article acknowledges that it is too soon to say the agreement between Colombia and the US is invalid according to international law, since the criteria established regarding the invalidity of treaties based on consent is very strict.
哥伦比亚和美利坚合众国政府同意，除其他原因外，美国军队的一个专门机构将于2020年6月抵达哥伦比亚，共同努力打击毒品贩运。然而，美国军队进入哥伦比亚是有争议的，主要有三个原因:(i)领土对国家主权的重要性;哥伦比亚政府没有履行关于参议院对外国部队过境的强制性授权的宪法规定;(iii)认为美国军队在哥伦比亚是为了对现任总统Nicolás马杜罗领导的委内瑞拉政府采取行动。本文认为，军事援助是符合联合国宪章的，如果一个国家要求处理内部事务，并根据事先商定的条款和条件进行。尽管有几项条约可以证明132 SOBERANÍA Y COOPERACIÓN国际:ANÁLISIS CRÍTICO哥伦比亚的国家法律体系，哥伦比亚的国家法律体系，国际先例，2021年第18卷/ ENERO-JUNIO, 129-157。CALI -哥伦比亚美国军队抵达哥伦比亚，未经主管当局表示同意，使得他们在哥伦比亚的存在是非法的。然而，根据国际法院的判例，这篇文章承认，根据国际法说哥伦比亚和美国之间的协议无效还为时过早，因为关于基于同意的条约无效的标准非常严格。
{"title":"Soberanía y cooperación internacional: análisis crítico de la llegada de tropas estadounidenses a Colombia desde la perspectiva del derecho internacional","authors":"Lina Marcela Tello Perlaza","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V18.4577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V18.4577","url":null,"abstract":"The Governments of Colombia and the United States of America agreed that a specialized agency of the United States army would arrive in Colombia in June 2020, among other reasons, to join efforts in order to counter drug trafficking. However, the arrival of the American troops in Colombia is controversial for three main reasons: (i) the importance of the territory with regard to a state’s sovereignty; (ii) the fact that the Colombian Government did not fulfil a constitutional requirement concerning the mandatory Senate authorization regarding the transit of foreign troops; (iii) the belief that the American troops are in Colombia to carry out actions against the current Venezuelan Government led by president Nicolás Maduro. This article argues that military assistance is compatible with the UN Charter if requested by a state to cope with internal matters and is carried out according to the terms and conditions previously agreed upon. Even though there are several treaties that could justify 132 SOBERANÍA Y COOPERACIÓN INTERNACIONAL: ANÁLISIS CRÍTICO DE LA LLEGADA DE TROPAS ESTADOUNIDENSES A COLOMBIA DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA DEL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PRECEDENTE 2021 VOL. 18 / ENERO-JUNIO, 129-157. CALI – COLOMBIA the arrival of American troops in Colombia, the lack of consent expressed by the competent authority renders illegal their presence in Colombia. Nonetheless, based on the International Court of Justice jurisprudence, the article acknowledges that it is too soon to say the agreement between Colombia and the US is invalid according to international law, since the criteria established regarding the invalidity of treaties based on consent is very strict.","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"18 1","pages":"129-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47617938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
En este artículo se hace un recuento del devenir de los derechos a la diferencia en México, desde una perspectiva jurídico-antropológica; se señalan las vicisitudes que las poblaciones indígenas han atravesado en su lucha por el reconocimiento a sus identidades y territorios; y, finalmente, se pone énfasis en el panorama multicultural actual, desarrollando los avances y retos del Estado mexicano en términos de protección y garantías de las poblaciones que han decidido conservar y transmitir formas de vida no occidentales.
{"title":"Indígenas, sujetos excluidos y marginados por la Constitución mexicana","authors":"J. Abreu","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V17.3805","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V17.3805","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000En este artículo se hace un recuento del devenir de los derechos a la diferencia en México, desde una perspectiva jurídico-antropológica; se señalan las vicisitudes que las poblaciones indígenas han atravesado en su lucha por el reconocimiento a sus identidades y territorios; y, finalmente, se pone énfasis en el panorama multicultural actual, desarrollando los avances y retos del Estado mexicano en términos de protección y garantías de las poblaciones que han decidido conservar y transmitir formas de vida no occidentales. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"17 1","pages":"41-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46087583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：