抗病毒RNAi介导的植物防御与病毒的抑制

D. Gupta, S. Mukherjee
{"title":"抗病毒RNAi介导的植物防御与病毒的抑制","authors":"D. Gupta, S. Mukherjee","doi":"10.29328/JOURNAL.JPSP.1001025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The age-old battle between plants and viruses has many twists and turns. Plants acquired the RNAi factors to checkmate the viruses and the viruses encode VSRs to defeat RNAi for their own survival. Plants designed mechanisms to neutralize the toxic effects of VSRs and the viruses, in their turn, use host microRNAs to strengthen their infection processes. The infi ghtings between these two entities will take different shapes with prolonged evolution and accordingly the researchers will dig these novel forms of duels not only to throw lights in the involved mechanisms but also to manipulate various antiviral strategies. Some of the research courses that might come up in the immediate future are discussed. Commentary Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses Dinesh Gupta1 and Sunil Kumar Mukherjee2* 1Translational Bioinformatics Group, ICGEB, New Delhi, India 2Division of Plant Pathology, IARI, New Delhi, India *Address for Correspondence: Sunil Kumar Mukherjee, Division of Plant Pathology, IARI, New Delhi, India, Tel: +91-9871995629; 011-2584-3588; Fax: 011-2584-0772; Email: sunilmukherjeeudsc@gmail.com Submitted: 27 December 2018 Approved: 24 January 2019 Published: 25 January 2019 Copyright: © 2019 Gupta D, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited How to cite this article: Gupta D, Mukherjee SK. Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses. J Plant Sci Phytopathol. 2019; 3: 001-008. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001025 The arms race between host and virus is a continually evolving process involving multiple layers of interactions. Most of all eukaryotic organisms are RNAi-competent and defend themselves against the intruding molecular parasites, namely Viruses and Transposons [1]. As a reaction to host-defense (or rather counterdefence), viruses have also generated multiple weapons in their armory. The hosts in turn tighten up their security by developing means of counter-counterdefence. Viruses also reciprocate and invent strategies to weaken the hosts in subsequent rounds. All plant viruses encode RNAi-suppressors (VSRs) and use them to battle the host RNA-factors to uphold their counter-defense [2]. The VSRs are deactivated by hosts by mechanisms known as counter-counter defense. Following viral invasion in plants, host-microRNA (miR) pro iles undergo a lot of changes [3]. A subset of these deregulated miRs likely works against viral invasion, multiplication and systemic propagation [4,5]. However, recent reports indicate that some of the virus-induced miRs are also used to sensitise the host for enhancing viral invasion. Of the latter category, we would like to choose only three miRs, namely miR168, miR6026 and miR319 here as the representative candidates for their ability to sustain viral growth. There are other miRs who also work in similar pathway but we have chosen the above three because of the preponderance of literature reports. Following entry of viruses in the plant cell, ds-RNA intermediates of viral genomes; viral transcripts etc. are generated due to various reasons like viral genome replication/ transcription, convergent transcriptions from viral genomes or hosts’ RNA dependent RNA Polymerases activities on the viral transcripts etc. These dsRNAs are diced by DCLs to produce small RNAs which are known as V-siRNAs [6]. The V-siRNAs are further ampli ied by host-dependent processes and are known as secondary V-siRNAs or Va-siRNAs [7]. These V-siRNAs, along with Va-siRNAs, either slice or translationally inhibit the viral mRNAs in RISC mediated processes and eventually reduce the virus titer [8]. Various host factors work in this host-defense pathway and are known as antiviral RNAi factors. The core defense factors include RDRs (mostly RDR6, RDR2, RDR1), DCLs (mostly DCL4, followed by DCL2), and AGO proteins (AGO1, AGO2, AGO3, AGO4, Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses Published: January 25, 2019 002 AGO5, AGO7, AGO10 etc.). A list of these factors in arabidopsis and rice are shown in table 1. Generally, DCL4 is the major producer of V-siRNA with DCL2 playing the second iddle. However, there are few instances where DCL2 plays the major role over DCL4, for example, the patho-system of Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV) and tomato [9]. DCL3 also participates in case of viruses with single-stranded DNA genomes, namely begomoviruses, to transcriptionally silence the viral DNA genome [10]. The v-siRNAs of three different sizes (21/22/24 bps) spread from the source of production to distant non-infected cells in systemic fashions and thus protect the distant cells against incoming viral invasion. This systemic activity is facilitated by DCL2 while DCL4 plays the antagonistic inhibitory role [11,12]. In addition to the core factors, a few other accessory antiviral factors have recently been screened genetically and are listed in table 2 [13,14]. Besides the V-siRNAs, the deregulated host miRs caused by viral invasions also play antiviral roles [5]. A set of plant miRs have been bioinformatically postulated that retain the ability to silence viral ORFs, and only a couple of them have been validated experimentally [4]. Plum pox virus (PPV) chimeras harbor plant miRNA target sequences and these are functional in Arabidopsis, and were also silenced by miRNA function in three different host plants [15]. Some tomato miRs are also known to produce phasiRNAs with antiviral activity [9]. The generations of the 21-nuclotide phasiRNAs are initiated by the action of DCL2-made 22-mer miRs on several diseaserelated genes; and factors like DCL4, together with AGO1, AGO4, AGO7, SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING3 (SGS3), RDR6, and DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA BINDING FACTOR 4 (DRB4) etc. are involved in different steps of phasiRNA synthesis [16]. Viruses have also evolved to defeat the antiviral RNAi pathways, mostly by encoding proteins from their genomes that are known as RNAi suppressors. These suppressors not only counteract host defense but also participate in other pathways necessary for the viral life cycle. These are very important for viral replication and Table 1: Core antiviral RNAi factors.","PeriodicalId":93470,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plant science and phytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses\",\"authors\":\"D. Gupta, S. Mukherjee\",\"doi\":\"10.29328/JOURNAL.JPSP.1001025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The age-old battle between plants and viruses has many twists and turns. Plants acquired the RNAi factors to checkmate the viruses and the viruses encode VSRs to defeat RNAi for their own survival. Plants designed mechanisms to neutralize the toxic effects of VSRs and the viruses, in their turn, use host microRNAs to strengthen their infection processes. The infi ghtings between these two entities will take different shapes with prolonged evolution and accordingly the researchers will dig these novel forms of duels not only to throw lights in the involved mechanisms but also to manipulate various antiviral strategies. Some of the research courses that might come up in the immediate future are discussed. Commentary Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses Dinesh Gupta1 and Sunil Kumar Mukherjee2* 1Translational Bioinformatics Group, ICGEB, New Delhi, India 2Division of Plant Pathology, IARI, New Delhi, India *Address for Correspondence: Sunil Kumar Mukherjee, Division of Plant Pathology, IARI, New Delhi, India, Tel: +91-9871995629; 011-2584-3588; Fax: 011-2584-0772; Email: sunilmukherjeeudsc@gmail.com Submitted: 27 December 2018 Approved: 24 January 2019 Published: 25 January 2019 Copyright: © 2019 Gupta D, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited How to cite this article: Gupta D, Mukherjee SK. Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses. J Plant Sci Phytopathol. 2019; 3: 001-008. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001025 The arms race between host and virus is a continually evolving process involving multiple layers of interactions. Most of all eukaryotic organisms are RNAi-competent and defend themselves against the intruding molecular parasites, namely Viruses and Transposons [1]. As a reaction to host-defense (or rather counterdefence), viruses have also generated multiple weapons in their armory. The hosts in turn tighten up their security by developing means of counter-counterdefence. Viruses also reciprocate and invent strategies to weaken the hosts in subsequent rounds. All plant viruses encode RNAi-suppressors (VSRs) and use them to battle the host RNA-factors to uphold their counter-defense [2]. The VSRs are deactivated by hosts by mechanisms known as counter-counter defense. Following viral invasion in plants, host-microRNA (miR) pro iles undergo a lot of changes [3]. A subset of these deregulated miRs likely works against viral invasion, multiplication and systemic propagation [4,5]. However, recent reports indicate that some of the virus-induced miRs are also used to sensitise the host for enhancing viral invasion. Of the latter category, we would like to choose only three miRs, namely miR168, miR6026 and miR319 here as the representative candidates for their ability to sustain viral growth. There are other miRs who also work in similar pathway but we have chosen the above three because of the preponderance of literature reports. Following entry of viruses in the plant cell, ds-RNA intermediates of viral genomes; viral transcripts etc. are generated due to various reasons like viral genome replication/ transcription, convergent transcriptions from viral genomes or hosts’ RNA dependent RNA Polymerases activities on the viral transcripts etc. These dsRNAs are diced by DCLs to produce small RNAs which are known as V-siRNAs [6]. The V-siRNAs are further ampli ied by host-dependent processes and are known as secondary V-siRNAs or Va-siRNAs [7]. These V-siRNAs, along with Va-siRNAs, either slice or translationally inhibit the viral mRNAs in RISC mediated processes and eventually reduce the virus titer [8]. Various host factors work in this host-defense pathway and are known as antiviral RNAi factors. The core defense factors include RDRs (mostly RDR6, RDR2, RDR1), DCLs (mostly DCL4, followed by DCL2), and AGO proteins (AGO1, AGO2, AGO3, AGO4, Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses Published: January 25, 2019 002 AGO5, AGO7, AGO10 etc.). A list of these factors in arabidopsis and rice are shown in table 1. Generally, DCL4 is the major producer of V-siRNA with DCL2 playing the second iddle. However, there are few instances where DCL2 plays the major role over DCL4, for example, the patho-system of Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV) and tomato [9]. DCL3 also participates in case of viruses with single-stranded DNA genomes, namely begomoviruses, to transcriptionally silence the viral DNA genome [10]. The v-siRNAs of three different sizes (21/22/24 bps) spread from the source of production to distant non-infected cells in systemic fashions and thus protect the distant cells against incoming viral invasion. This systemic activity is facilitated by DCL2 while DCL4 plays the antagonistic inhibitory role [11,12]. In addition to the core factors, a few other accessory antiviral factors have recently been screened genetically and are listed in table 2 [13,14]. Besides the V-siRNAs, the deregulated host miRs caused by viral invasions also play antiviral roles [5]. A set of plant miRs have been bioinformatically postulated that retain the ability to silence viral ORFs, and only a couple of them have been validated experimentally [4]. Plum pox virus (PPV) chimeras harbor plant miRNA target sequences and these are functional in Arabidopsis, and were also silenced by miRNA function in three different host plants [15]. Some tomato miRs are also known to produce phasiRNAs with antiviral activity [9]. The generations of the 21-nuclotide phasiRNAs are initiated by the action of DCL2-made 22-mer miRs on several diseaserelated genes; and factors like DCL4, together with AGO1, AGO4, AGO7, SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING3 (SGS3), RDR6, and DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA BINDING FACTOR 4 (DRB4) etc. are involved in different steps of phasiRNA synthesis [16]. Viruses have also evolved to defeat the antiviral RNAi pathways, mostly by encoding proteins from their genomes that are known as RNAi suppressors. These suppressors not only counteract host defense but also participate in other pathways necessary for the viral life cycle. These are very important for viral replication and Table 1: Core antiviral RNAi factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of plant science and phytopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of plant science and phytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29328/JOURNAL.JPSP.1001025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of plant science and phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/JOURNAL.JPSP.1001025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

植物和病毒之间由来已久的斗争有很多曲折。植物获得RNAi因子来检查病毒,病毒编码VSR来击败RNAi以获得自身生存。植物设计了中和VSRs毒性作用的机制,而病毒反过来利用宿主微小RNA来加强其感染过程。随着进化的延长,这两个实体之间的争斗将呈现不同的形式,因此研究人员将挖掘这些新形式的决斗,不仅是为了揭示相关机制,还为了操纵各种抗病毒策略。讨论了在不久的将来可能出现的一些研究课程。评论抗病毒RNAi介导的植物防御与病毒对其的抑制Dinesh Gupta1和Sunil Kumar Mukherjee 2*1翻译生物信息学小组,ICGEB,印度新德里2植物病理学部门,IARI,印度新德里*通讯地址:Sunil Kumar-Mukerjee,IARI植物病理学部,印度新德里,电话:+91-987195629;011-2584-3588;传真:011-2584-0772;电子邮件:sunilmukherjeeudsc@gmail.com提交:2018年12月27日批准:2019年1月24日发布:2019年01月25日版权所有:©2019 Gupta D等人。这是一篇根据知识共享署名许可证分发的开放获取文章,该许可证允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用了原作。如何引用本文:Gupta D.Mukherjee SK。抗病毒RNAi介导的植物防御与病毒对其的抑制。植物科学与植物病理学杂志。2019年;3:001-008。https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001025宿主和病毒之间的军备竞赛是一个不断演变的过程,涉及多层相互作用。大多数真核生物都具有RNAi能力,可以抵御入侵的分子寄生虫,即病毒和转座子[1]。作为对宿主防御(或者更确切地说是反防御)的反应,病毒在其军械库中也产生了多种武器。东道主反过来通过发展反防御手段来加强安全。病毒也会相互作用,并在随后的几轮中发明削弱宿主的策略。所有植物病毒都编码RNAi抑制剂(VSRs),并利用它们对抗宿主RNA因子以维持其防御[2]。VSR由主机通过称为反防御的机制停用。病毒入侵植物后,宿主微小RNA(miR)原代会发生很多变化[3]。这些失调的miR的一个子集可能对病毒入侵、增殖和系统传播有效[4,5]。然而,最近的报道表明,一些病毒诱导的miR也被用于使宿主敏感,以增强病毒入侵。在后一类中,我们只选择三种miR,即miR168、miR6026和miR319,作为它们维持病毒生长能力的代表性候选者。还有其他miR也在类似的途径中发挥作用,但由于文献报道的优势,我们选择了上述三种。病毒进入植物细胞后,病毒基因组的ds-RNA中间体;病毒转录物等是由于各种原因产生的,如病毒基因组复制/转录、来自病毒基因组的趋同转录或宿主对病毒转录物的RNA依赖性RNA聚合酶活性等。这些dsRNA被DCL切割以产生小RNA,称为V-siRNA[6]。V-siRNA通过宿主依赖性过程进一步扩增,被称为次级V-siRNA或Va-siRNA[7]。这些V-siRNA与Va-siRNA一起,在RISC介导的过程中切割或翻译抑制病毒mRNA,并最终降低病毒滴度[8]。各种宿主因子在这种宿主防御途径中发挥作用,被称为抗病毒RNAi因子。核心防御因子包括RDRs(主要是RDR6、RDR2、RDR1)、DCLs(主要是DCL4,其次是DCL2)和AGO蛋白(AGO1、AGO2、AGO3、AGO4,抗病毒RNAi介导的植物防御与病毒对其的抑制发表时间:2019年1月25日002 AGO5、AGO7、AGO10等)。拟南芥和水稻中这些因子的列表如表1所示。一般来说,DCL4是V-siRNA的主要生产商,DCL2是次要生产商。然而,很少有DCL2在DCL4上发挥主要作用的例子,例如番茄花叶病毒(ToMV)和番茄的病理系统[9]。DCL3也参与具有单链DNA基因组的病毒,即秋海棠病毒,以转录沉默病毒DNA基因组[10]。三种不同大小(21/22/24bps)的v-siRNA以系统方式从产生源传播到远处的未感染细胞,从而保护远处的细胞免受病毒入侵。DCL2促进了这种全身活性,而DCL4发挥拮抗抑制作用[11,12]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses
The age-old battle between plants and viruses has many twists and turns. Plants acquired the RNAi factors to checkmate the viruses and the viruses encode VSRs to defeat RNAi for their own survival. Plants designed mechanisms to neutralize the toxic effects of VSRs and the viruses, in their turn, use host microRNAs to strengthen their infection processes. The infi ghtings between these two entities will take different shapes with prolonged evolution and accordingly the researchers will dig these novel forms of duels not only to throw lights in the involved mechanisms but also to manipulate various antiviral strategies. Some of the research courses that might come up in the immediate future are discussed. Commentary Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses Dinesh Gupta1 and Sunil Kumar Mukherjee2* 1Translational Bioinformatics Group, ICGEB, New Delhi, India 2Division of Plant Pathology, IARI, New Delhi, India *Address for Correspondence: Sunil Kumar Mukherjee, Division of Plant Pathology, IARI, New Delhi, India, Tel: +91-9871995629; 011-2584-3588; Fax: 011-2584-0772; Email: sunilmukherjeeudsc@gmail.com Submitted: 27 December 2018 Approved: 24 January 2019 Published: 25 January 2019 Copyright: © 2019 Gupta D, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited How to cite this article: Gupta D, Mukherjee SK. Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses. J Plant Sci Phytopathol. 2019; 3: 001-008. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001025 The arms race between host and virus is a continually evolving process involving multiple layers of interactions. Most of all eukaryotic organisms are RNAi-competent and defend themselves against the intruding molecular parasites, namely Viruses and Transposons [1]. As a reaction to host-defense (or rather counterdefence), viruses have also generated multiple weapons in their armory. The hosts in turn tighten up their security by developing means of counter-counterdefence. Viruses also reciprocate and invent strategies to weaken the hosts in subsequent rounds. All plant viruses encode RNAi-suppressors (VSRs) and use them to battle the host RNA-factors to uphold their counter-defense [2]. The VSRs are deactivated by hosts by mechanisms known as counter-counter defense. Following viral invasion in plants, host-microRNA (miR) pro iles undergo a lot of changes [3]. A subset of these deregulated miRs likely works against viral invasion, multiplication and systemic propagation [4,5]. However, recent reports indicate that some of the virus-induced miRs are also used to sensitise the host for enhancing viral invasion. Of the latter category, we would like to choose only three miRs, namely miR168, miR6026 and miR319 here as the representative candidates for their ability to sustain viral growth. There are other miRs who also work in similar pathway but we have chosen the above three because of the preponderance of literature reports. Following entry of viruses in the plant cell, ds-RNA intermediates of viral genomes; viral transcripts etc. are generated due to various reasons like viral genome replication/ transcription, convergent transcriptions from viral genomes or hosts’ RNA dependent RNA Polymerases activities on the viral transcripts etc. These dsRNAs are diced by DCLs to produce small RNAs which are known as V-siRNAs [6]. The V-siRNAs are further ampli ied by host-dependent processes and are known as secondary V-siRNAs or Va-siRNAs [7]. These V-siRNAs, along with Va-siRNAs, either slice or translationally inhibit the viral mRNAs in RISC mediated processes and eventually reduce the virus titer [8]. Various host factors work in this host-defense pathway and are known as antiviral RNAi factors. The core defense factors include RDRs (mostly RDR6, RDR2, RDR1), DCLs (mostly DCL4, followed by DCL2), and AGO proteins (AGO1, AGO2, AGO3, AGO4, Antiviral RNAi mediated Plant defense versus its suppression by viruses Published: January 25, 2019 002 AGO5, AGO7, AGO10 etc.). A list of these factors in arabidopsis and rice are shown in table 1. Generally, DCL4 is the major producer of V-siRNA with DCL2 playing the second iddle. However, there are few instances where DCL2 plays the major role over DCL4, for example, the patho-system of Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV) and tomato [9]. DCL3 also participates in case of viruses with single-stranded DNA genomes, namely begomoviruses, to transcriptionally silence the viral DNA genome [10]. The v-siRNAs of three different sizes (21/22/24 bps) spread from the source of production to distant non-infected cells in systemic fashions and thus protect the distant cells against incoming viral invasion. This systemic activity is facilitated by DCL2 while DCL4 plays the antagonistic inhibitory role [11,12]. In addition to the core factors, a few other accessory antiviral factors have recently been screened genetically and are listed in table 2 [13,14]. Besides the V-siRNAs, the deregulated host miRs caused by viral invasions also play antiviral roles [5]. A set of plant miRs have been bioinformatically postulated that retain the ability to silence viral ORFs, and only a couple of them have been validated experimentally [4]. Plum pox virus (PPV) chimeras harbor plant miRNA target sequences and these are functional in Arabidopsis, and were also silenced by miRNA function in three different host plants [15]. Some tomato miRs are also known to produce phasiRNAs with antiviral activity [9]. The generations of the 21-nuclotide phasiRNAs are initiated by the action of DCL2-made 22-mer miRs on several diseaserelated genes; and factors like DCL4, together with AGO1, AGO4, AGO7, SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING3 (SGS3), RDR6, and DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA BINDING FACTOR 4 (DRB4) etc. are involved in different steps of phasiRNA synthesis [16]. Viruses have also evolved to defeat the antiviral RNAi pathways, mostly by encoding proteins from their genomes that are known as RNAi suppressors. These suppressors not only counteract host defense but also participate in other pathways necessary for the viral life cycle. These are very important for viral replication and Table 1: Core antiviral RNAi factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Melaleuca Essential Oil (Melaleuca alternifolia cheel) in the Control of Beans Diseases GS-MS Profile, Total Flavonoid and Phenolic Contents and Antioxidant Capacity of Leaves of Vitelleria paradoxa c.f. Gaertn Are Biofungicides a Means of Plant Protection for the Future? New Fungi Associated with Blackberry Root Rot (Rubus spp.), in Michoacán, Mexico Effect of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.) Infestation on the Growth Parameters of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) in Kebbi State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1