印度尼西亚证据法下法庭之友的地位

Fadil Aulia, Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin
{"title":"印度尼西亚证据法下法庭之友的地位","authors":"Fadil Aulia, Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin","doi":"10.18196/JMH.20200152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of amicus curiae has been common in Indonesia, especially in criminal courts. Although there is no clear regulation on amicus curiae, in practice, it has been submitted more than 24 times to the courts. Even there are some judges who consider amicus curiae in making their decisions. This paper aims to determine and examine the legal standing and the strength of amicus curiae under the Indonesian law of evidence. This normative legal research relies on the secondary data in the form of legal material. It is found that the opinion of an amicus curiae, which is usually submitted to the court in written form, could be used as a documentary evidence as intended in Article 187 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, it has no binding force. Therefore, the judges are free whether or not to consider the opinion submitted by the amicus curiae.","PeriodicalId":53118,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Media Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Position of Amicus Curiae under the Indonesian Law of Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Fadil Aulia, Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin\",\"doi\":\"10.18196/JMH.20200152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of amicus curiae has been common in Indonesia, especially in criminal courts. Although there is no clear regulation on amicus curiae, in practice, it has been submitted more than 24 times to the courts. Even there are some judges who consider amicus curiae in making their decisions. This paper aims to determine and examine the legal standing and the strength of amicus curiae under the Indonesian law of evidence. This normative legal research relies on the secondary data in the form of legal material. It is found that the opinion of an amicus curiae, which is usually submitted to the court in written form, could be used as a documentary evidence as intended in Article 187 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, it has no binding force. Therefore, the judges are free whether or not to consider the opinion submitted by the amicus curiae.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Media Hukum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Media Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18196/JMH.20200152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Media Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/JMH.20200152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

法庭之友的使用在印度尼西亚很常见,特别是在刑事法院。尽管没有关于法庭之友的明确规定,但在实践中,它已经向法院提交了24次以上。甚至还有一些法官在作出裁决时考虑法庭之友。本文旨在确定和审查印度尼西亚证据法下法庭之友的法律地位和效力。这种规范性的法律研究依赖于法律材料形式的次要数据。据发现,法庭之友的意见通常以书面形式提交给法院,可作为《刑事诉讼法》第187条规定的书面证据。然而,它没有约束力。因此,法官可以自由决定是否考虑法庭之友提交的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Position of Amicus Curiae under the Indonesian Law of Evidence
The use of amicus curiae has been common in Indonesia, especially in criminal courts. Although there is no clear regulation on amicus curiae, in practice, it has been submitted more than 24 times to the courts. Even there are some judges who consider amicus curiae in making their decisions. This paper aims to determine and examine the legal standing and the strength of amicus curiae under the Indonesian law of evidence. This normative legal research relies on the secondary data in the form of legal material. It is found that the opinion of an amicus curiae, which is usually submitted to the court in written form, could be used as a documentary evidence as intended in Article 187 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, it has no binding force. Therefore, the judges are free whether or not to consider the opinion submitted by the amicus curiae.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Reintegration after the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Indonesian Criminal Code Kerangka Penyusunan Produk Hukum Daerah Berbasis Pada Kekhususan Dan Keberagaman Daerah Kedudukan Wakil Kepala Daerah Menurut Undang-Undang No.23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah Revitalisasi Hukum Islam Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia Peran Mahasiswa Dalam Mencegah Politik Uang Dan Kecurangan Pemilu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1