HPLC-MS/MS测定尿肌酐的新方法:与Jaffè方法的比较研究

Lidia Caporossi, Enrico Paci, Silvia Capanna, Bruno Papaleo, Giovanna Tranfo, Daniela Pigini
{"title":"HPLC-MS/MS测定尿肌酐的新方法:与Jaffè方法的比较研究","authors":"Lidia Caporossi,&nbsp;Enrico Paci,&nbsp;Silvia Capanna,&nbsp;Bruno Papaleo,&nbsp;Giovanna Tranfo,&nbsp;Daniela Pigini","doi":"10.1016/j.urine.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urinary biomarkers are usually reported as a normalized ratio to creatinuria, a lack of correct creatinine determination lead to wrong final data. This study aimed to evaluate the Jaffè method accuracy, proposing a new HPLC-MS/MS method. The validation parameters were: run time of 4 ​min, LOD of 0.02 ​mg/L, CV% lower than 4%, recovery &gt;96.1%, no matrix effect.</p><p>The comparison between HPLC-MS/MS and Jaffè method showed an average bias, variable from high (1.5–3.00 ​g/L) to low concentrations (below than 0.7 ​g/L) of creatinine, ranging from +31% to −25%. The critical issue for the normalization of biomonitoring data was highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75287,"journal":{"name":"Urine (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new HPLC-MS/MS method for urinary creatinine determination: Comparison study with Jaffè’s method\",\"authors\":\"Lidia Caporossi,&nbsp;Enrico Paci,&nbsp;Silvia Capanna,&nbsp;Bruno Papaleo,&nbsp;Giovanna Tranfo,&nbsp;Daniela Pigini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urine.2023.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Urinary biomarkers are usually reported as a normalized ratio to creatinuria, a lack of correct creatinine determination lead to wrong final data. This study aimed to evaluate the Jaffè method accuracy, proposing a new HPLC-MS/MS method. The validation parameters were: run time of 4 ​min, LOD of 0.02 ​mg/L, CV% lower than 4%, recovery &gt;96.1%, no matrix effect.</p><p>The comparison between HPLC-MS/MS and Jaffè method showed an average bias, variable from high (1.5–3.00 ​g/L) to low concentrations (below than 0.7 ​g/L) of creatinine, ranging from +31% to −25%. The critical issue for the normalization of biomonitoring data was highlighted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urine (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 23-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urine (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590280623000037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urine (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590280623000037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尿液生物标志物通常报告为与肌酐的标准化比率,缺乏正确的肌酐测定导致错误的最终数据。本研究旨在评价Jaffè方法的准确性,提出一种新的HPLC-MS/MS方法。验证参数为:运行时间4 min,检出限0.02 mg/L, CV% < 4%,回收率96.1%,无基质效应。HPLC-MS/MS和Jaffè方法的比较显示平均偏差,从高(1.5-3.00 g/L)到低(低于0.7 g/L)的肌酐浓度变化,范围为+31%到- 25%。强调了生物监测数据规范化的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new HPLC-MS/MS method for urinary creatinine determination: Comparison study with Jaffè’s method

Urinary biomarkers are usually reported as a normalized ratio to creatinuria, a lack of correct creatinine determination lead to wrong final data. This study aimed to evaluate the Jaffè method accuracy, proposing a new HPLC-MS/MS method. The validation parameters were: run time of 4 ​min, LOD of 0.02 ​mg/L, CV% lower than 4%, recovery >96.1%, no matrix effect.

The comparison between HPLC-MS/MS and Jaffè method showed an average bias, variable from high (1.5–3.00 ​g/L) to low concentrations (below than 0.7 ​g/L) of creatinine, ranging from +31% to −25%. The critical issue for the normalization of biomonitoring data was highlighted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urine (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Urine (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Health Informatics, Pathology and Medical Technology, Urology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
99 days
期刊最新文献
In addition to early biomarkers, what else can be done with urine? CreCENT: Creatinine and Chloride based Electrochemical Non-faradaic renal health mapping Technology A facile strategy for comprehensive proteome analysis of urine using ultracentrifugation fractionation, solid-phase alkylation based sample preparation and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry A new HPLC-MS/MS method for urinary creatinine determination: Comparison study with Jaffè’s method A review on traditional natural compounds and conventional methods for the treatment of UTI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1