检察官希西家与古代正典形成理论

IF 0.6 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal of Biblical Literature Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.3
Eva Mroczek
{"title":"检察官希西家与古代正典形成理论","authors":"Eva Mroczek","doi":"10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article recovers a Jewish and Christian tradition about King Hezekiah as a censor and gatekeeper of scriptural texts. While modern scholarship often assumes that \"traditional\" interpreters had an ahistorical approach to the Bible, a thread of speculation about Hezekiah's role in canon formation reveals that ancient readers were aware that their texts had a history: theories about their transmission were themselves a kind of biblical interpretation. This cluster of traditions rests on two aspects of Hezekiah's portrayal in the Bible—the transmission of proverbs in his court (Prov 25:1) and Hezekiah as an anti-idolater (2 Kings)—which intertwine to refashion him as a curator of public knowledge who distinguishes between texts to be transmitted and texts to be suppressed. The motif has been overlooked because it exists largely in marginal references, but the data reveal a shared discourse about how the Bible emerged as a result of suppression and selection from a later body of revelation. Recovering this tradition challenges the sharp distinction between \"traditional\" and \"historical-critical\" approaches, which also speculate about Hezekiah's role in the Bible's origins. It also reveals a type of biblical interpretation that is unthreatened by the idea that Scripture developed over time—instead, speculation about the textual history of the Bible becomes another mode of animating biblical characters and episodes.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"140 1","pages":"481 - 502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hezekiah the Censor and Ancient Theories of Canon Formation\",\"authors\":\"Eva Mroczek\",\"doi\":\"10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article recovers a Jewish and Christian tradition about King Hezekiah as a censor and gatekeeper of scriptural texts. While modern scholarship often assumes that \\\"traditional\\\" interpreters had an ahistorical approach to the Bible, a thread of speculation about Hezekiah's role in canon formation reveals that ancient readers were aware that their texts had a history: theories about their transmission were themselves a kind of biblical interpretation. This cluster of traditions rests on two aspects of Hezekiah's portrayal in the Bible—the transmission of proverbs in his court (Prov 25:1) and Hezekiah as an anti-idolater (2 Kings)—which intertwine to refashion him as a curator of public knowledge who distinguishes between texts to be transmitted and texts to be suppressed. The motif has been overlooked because it exists largely in marginal references, but the data reveal a shared discourse about how the Bible emerged as a result of suppression and selection from a later body of revelation. Recovering this tradition challenges the sharp distinction between \\\"traditional\\\" and \\\"historical-critical\\\" approaches, which also speculate about Hezekiah's role in the Bible's origins. It also reveals a type of biblical interpretation that is unthreatened by the idea that Scripture developed over time—instead, speculation about the textual history of the Bible becomes another mode of animating biblical characters and episodes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"481 - 502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:这篇文章恢复了犹太和基督教关于希西家国王作为圣经文本审查和看门人的传统。虽然现代学术界经常认为“传统”口译员对《圣经》有一种非历史的解读方式,但对希西家在正典形成中的作用的一系列猜测表明,古代读者意识到他们的文本有一段历史:关于其传播的理论本身就是一种圣经解读。这一系列传统基于希西家在《圣经》中描绘的两个方面——在他的宫廷中传播谚语(Prov 25:1)和希西家作为一个反偶像崇拜者(列王记下)——这两个方面交织在一起,将他重塑为一个公共知识的策展人,区分要传播的文本和要压制的文本。这一主题一直被忽视,因为它主要存在于边缘参考文献中,但数据揭示了一个共同的论述,即《圣经》是如何从后来的启示中被压制和选择而出现的。恢复这一传统挑战了“传统”和“历史批判”方法之间的鲜明区别,这也推测了希西家在《圣经》起源中的作用。它还揭示了一种圣经解释,它不受圣经随时间发展的想法的威胁——相反,对圣经文本历史的猜测成为了另一种动画化圣经人物和情节的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hezekiah the Censor and Ancient Theories of Canon Formation
Abstract:This article recovers a Jewish and Christian tradition about King Hezekiah as a censor and gatekeeper of scriptural texts. While modern scholarship often assumes that "traditional" interpreters had an ahistorical approach to the Bible, a thread of speculation about Hezekiah's role in canon formation reveals that ancient readers were aware that their texts had a history: theories about their transmission were themselves a kind of biblical interpretation. This cluster of traditions rests on two aspects of Hezekiah's portrayal in the Bible—the transmission of proverbs in his court (Prov 25:1) and Hezekiah as an anti-idolater (2 Kings)—which intertwine to refashion him as a curator of public knowledge who distinguishes between texts to be transmitted and texts to be suppressed. The motif has been overlooked because it exists largely in marginal references, but the data reveal a shared discourse about how the Bible emerged as a result of suppression and selection from a later body of revelation. Recovering this tradition challenges the sharp distinction between "traditional" and "historical-critical" approaches, which also speculate about Hezekiah's role in the Bible's origins. It also reveals a type of biblical interpretation that is unthreatened by the idea that Scripture developed over time—instead, speculation about the textual history of the Bible becomes another mode of animating biblical characters and episodes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Getting Rigor Right: A Framework for Methodological Choice in Adaptive Monitoring and Evaluation. Love, Marriage, and a Delayed Harvest: Isaiah 61 as the Reversal of the Song of the Vineyard (5:1–7) Remembering God’s Beloved Son: Jeremiah 38:20 LXX and Mark 1:11 Exotica and the Ethiopian of Acts 8:26–40: Toward a Different Fabula John 21:15–19 as a Prophetic Succession: A Reading in Light of 2 Kings 2:1–18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1