保罗对马可福音的影响

IF 0.6 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal of Biblical Literature Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.7
Heidi Wendt
{"title":"保罗对马可福音的影响","authors":"Heidi Wendt","doi":"10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article bridges two substantial but historically distinct bodies of scholarship on the Gospel of Mark: investigation of its multiple secrecy motifs, on the one hand, and its alleged \"Paulinism,\" on the other. Recent decades have seen renewed interest in exploring a possible relationship between Paul and the earliest gospel, whether attributed to its general conformity with \"Pauline Christianity\" or to the author's specific knowledge of Pauline letters. Despite being a prominent topic in other scholarship on Mark, however, secrecy has received little sustained attention with respect to the question of Pauline influence. I address this lacuna by amplifying the many theological affinities between the texts while also exploring Mark's secrecy as a narrative strategy whose elements cooperate to privilege Paul as the principal (or only) authority on Christ. I then broach the implications of my reading for the gospel's early reception, offering preliminary theorization of intellectual dynamics it fostered and in which settings these may have resonated.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"140 1","pages":"579 - 600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secrecy as Pauline Influence on the Gospel of Mark\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Wendt\",\"doi\":\"10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article bridges two substantial but historically distinct bodies of scholarship on the Gospel of Mark: investigation of its multiple secrecy motifs, on the one hand, and its alleged \\\"Paulinism,\\\" on the other. Recent decades have seen renewed interest in exploring a possible relationship between Paul and the earliest gospel, whether attributed to its general conformity with \\\"Pauline Christianity\\\" or to the author's specific knowledge of Pauline letters. Despite being a prominent topic in other scholarship on Mark, however, secrecy has received little sustained attention with respect to the question of Pauline influence. I address this lacuna by amplifying the many theological affinities between the texts while also exploring Mark's secrecy as a narrative strategy whose elements cooperate to privilege Paul as the principal (or only) authority on Christ. I then broach the implications of my reading for the gospel's early reception, offering preliminary theorization of intellectual dynamics it fostered and in which settings these may have resonated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"579 - 600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文连接了两个实质性的但历史上截然不同的马可福音学术机构:一方面是对其多重秘密主题的调查,另一方面是对其所谓的“保利主义”的调查。近几十年来,人们对探索保罗和最早的福音书之间可能存在的关系重新产生了兴趣,这是否归因于它与“保罗式基督教”的普遍一致,还是归功于作者对保罗书信的具体了解。尽管是一个突出的话题,在其他学术上的马克,然而,保密已经收到很少持续的关注,就保罗的影响问题。我通过放大文本之间的神学联系来解决这个空白,同时也探索了马可的秘密,作为一种叙事策略,其元素合作,使保罗成为基督的主要(或唯一)权威。然后,我提出了我的阅读对福音早期接受的影响,提供了它所培养的智力动态的初步理论,以及这些可能产生共鸣的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secrecy as Pauline Influence on the Gospel of Mark
Abstract:This article bridges two substantial but historically distinct bodies of scholarship on the Gospel of Mark: investigation of its multiple secrecy motifs, on the one hand, and its alleged "Paulinism," on the other. Recent decades have seen renewed interest in exploring a possible relationship between Paul and the earliest gospel, whether attributed to its general conformity with "Pauline Christianity" or to the author's specific knowledge of Pauline letters. Despite being a prominent topic in other scholarship on Mark, however, secrecy has received little sustained attention with respect to the question of Pauline influence. I address this lacuna by amplifying the many theological affinities between the texts while also exploring Mark's secrecy as a narrative strategy whose elements cooperate to privilege Paul as the principal (or only) authority on Christ. I then broach the implications of my reading for the gospel's early reception, offering preliminary theorization of intellectual dynamics it fostered and in which settings these may have resonated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Getting Rigor Right: A Framework for Methodological Choice in Adaptive Monitoring and Evaluation. Love, Marriage, and a Delayed Harvest: Isaiah 61 as the Reversal of the Song of the Vineyard (5:1–7) Remembering God’s Beloved Son: Jeremiah 38:20 LXX and Mark 1:11 Exotica and the Ethiopian of Acts 8:26–40: Toward a Different Fabula John 21:15–19 as a Prophetic Succession: A Reading in Light of 2 Kings 2:1–18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1