基于博弈论的乌克兰个人所得税管理

Q3 Social Sciences Public and Municipal Finance Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI:10.21511/PMF.07(1).2018.05
O. Tymchenko, Yuliia Sybirianska, Y. Polishchuk, N. Rudyk, V. Korotun
{"title":"基于博弈论的乌克兰个人所得税管理","authors":"O. Tymchenko, Yuliia Sybirianska, Y. Polishchuk, N. Rudyk, V. Korotun","doi":"10.21511/PMF.07(1).2018.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main problems of the fiscal decentralization in Ukraine is the substantiation of the optimal proportion of the personal income tax distribution among the state and different types of local budgets in order to insure the sufficient financial resources for the territorial communities. Since period of the Budget Code adoption, the percentage of the personal income tax paid from salaries to the different levels of budgets has changed three times. However, the methodic of such distribution is not clear. The authors suggest approach of analyzing the logic of the personal income tax distribution on the game theory basis. They consider different ways of making decisions and prove that in all of the analyzed cases the winner was the central government of Ukraine. Such behavior of the central government in making decisions does not meet the goals of the fiscal decentralization reform. The main reason of such situation is that the decisions are made by the state government, but not by the local communities or their representatives. Besides, it is difficult to distribute the expenditures among different types of budgets according to the Governments’ competences. The authors suggest some recommendation of the personal income tax distribution in order to ensure benefits for all participants of the game: communities, local governments and central government. But they conclude that the active influence of people on the behavior of the local governments is the basic premise for the scientific research of the PIT optimal distribution.","PeriodicalId":52837,"journal":{"name":"Public and Municipal Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal income tax management in Ukraine on the game theory basis\",\"authors\":\"O. Tymchenko, Yuliia Sybirianska, Y. Polishchuk, N. Rudyk, V. Korotun\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/PMF.07(1).2018.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the main problems of the fiscal decentralization in Ukraine is the substantiation of the optimal proportion of the personal income tax distribution among the state and different types of local budgets in order to insure the sufficient financial resources for the territorial communities. Since period of the Budget Code adoption, the percentage of the personal income tax paid from salaries to the different levels of budgets has changed three times. However, the methodic of such distribution is not clear. The authors suggest approach of analyzing the logic of the personal income tax distribution on the game theory basis. They consider different ways of making decisions and prove that in all of the analyzed cases the winner was the central government of Ukraine. Such behavior of the central government in making decisions does not meet the goals of the fiscal decentralization reform. The main reason of such situation is that the decisions are made by the state government, but not by the local communities or their representatives. Besides, it is difficult to distribute the expenditures among different types of budgets according to the Governments’ competences. The authors suggest some recommendation of the personal income tax distribution in order to ensure benefits for all participants of the game: communities, local governments and central government. But they conclude that the active influence of people on the behavior of the local governments is the basic premise for the scientific research of the PIT optimal distribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public and Municipal Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public and Municipal Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/PMF.07(1).2018.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public and Municipal Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/PMF.07(1).2018.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

乌克兰财政权力下放的主要问题之一是在国家和不同类型的地方预算之间确定个人所得税分配的最佳比例,以确保领土社区有足够的财政资源。自《预算法》通过以来,从工资中支付的个人所得税在不同预算水平中的比例发生了三次变化。然而,这种分配的方法尚不清楚。笔者提出了基于博弈论的个人所得税分配逻辑分析方法。他们考虑了不同的决策方式,并证明在所有分析的案例中,赢家是乌克兰中央政府。中央政府的这种决策行为不符合财政分权改革的目标。造成这种情况的主要原因是,这些决定是由州政府做出的,而不是由当地社区或其代表做出的。此外,很难根据政府的权限在不同类型的预算中分配支出。作者提出了一些个人所得税分配的建议,以确保游戏的所有参与者:社区、地方政府和中央政府的利益。但他们得出的结论是,人们对地方政府行为的积极影响是科学研究PIT最优分配的基本前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personal income tax management in Ukraine on the game theory basis
One of the main problems of the fiscal decentralization in Ukraine is the substantiation of the optimal proportion of the personal income tax distribution among the state and different types of local budgets in order to insure the sufficient financial resources for the territorial communities. Since period of the Budget Code adoption, the percentage of the personal income tax paid from salaries to the different levels of budgets has changed three times. However, the methodic of such distribution is not clear. The authors suggest approach of analyzing the logic of the personal income tax distribution on the game theory basis. They consider different ways of making decisions and prove that in all of the analyzed cases the winner was the central government of Ukraine. Such behavior of the central government in making decisions does not meet the goals of the fiscal decentralization reform. The main reason of such situation is that the decisions are made by the state government, but not by the local communities or their representatives. Besides, it is difficult to distribute the expenditures among different types of budgets according to the Governments’ competences. The authors suggest some recommendation of the personal income tax distribution in order to ensure benefits for all participants of the game: communities, local governments and central government. But they conclude that the active influence of people on the behavior of the local governments is the basic premise for the scientific research of the PIT optimal distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public and Municipal Finance
Public and Municipal Finance Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Financial security of Ukraine under martial law: Impact of macroeconomic determinants The complexity of tax regulations and principles of justice as determinants of taxpayer compliance: case of Indonesia The impact of attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and organizational commitment on whistleblowing intention: A moderating role of local culture Enhancing administrative service delivery practices of local government: Experiences from Nepal Macroeconomic factors and government bond yield in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1