常规蒽环类药物治疗转移性乳腺癌症患者高累积剂量聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素的心脏安全性

A. Refaat, Dalia O. Mohamed, E. M. Ali, S. Khallaf
{"title":"常规蒽环类药物治疗转移性乳腺癌症患者高累积剂量聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素的心脏安全性","authors":"A. Refaat, Dalia O. Mohamed, E. M. Ali, S. Khallaf","doi":"10.4236/abcr.2020.93005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still challenging. Many \nstudies documented the efficacy of pegylated \nliposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with MBC, but there is a limited data \nabout the cardiac safety with high cumulative dose (HCD) of PLD. Aim of the \nwork: We conducted this trial to outline the cardiac \nsafety of HCD of PLD in patients with \nMBC who previously received conventional anthracyclines. Methods: During the period of nine years (January 2011 to \nDecember 2019). We extracted the data of the patients with MBC receiving \nPLD at Medical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut \nUniversity. These included patients’ demographics and therapeutic data \nincluding the full data of PLD, prior conventional anthracyclines, prior \ntrastuzumab, and prior radiotherapy. Also, data about comorbidities as well as \ncardiac and other toxicities of PLD were obtained. The data was analysed using \nSPSS v. 21. Results: For all 81 eligible patients, the mean age was 43.9 \nyears (±standard deviation (SD) 13.2). The mean cumulative dose of PLD was \n378.4 mg/m2 (± SD of 250.2) and a range of 100 - 1200 \nmg/m2. About thirty-one (38.3%) patients received high cumulative dose (400 mg/m2 or more), \nwhile the remaining 50 patients did not. The decline in left \nventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was relatively rare; and of low grade. Grade 2 decline in LVEF occurred in only two patients who \nreceived high cumulative dose of PLD, and only one patient who did not reach \nHCD (p = 0.555). Grade 3 or 4 decline in LVEF did not occur in patients either with \nor without HCD. Regarding other toxicities, there was a significant increase in \nincidence of all grades palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) in patients who received HCD of PLD when compared to those who did not reach the HCD (38.7% versus 16% respectively; p = 0.021). Conclusion: Our study concluded that the use of \nPLD seems to be a justified agent in the treatment of MBC who previously \ntreated by conventional anthracyclines in the adjuvant, metastatic or both settings, \neven in patients reaching the cumulative dose of conventional anthracycline.","PeriodicalId":67095,"journal":{"name":"乳腺癌(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac Safety with High Cumulative Dose of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Conventional Anthracyclines\",\"authors\":\"A. Refaat, Dalia O. Mohamed, E. M. Ali, S. Khallaf\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/abcr.2020.93005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still challenging. Many \\nstudies documented the efficacy of pegylated \\nliposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with MBC, but there is a limited data \\nabout the cardiac safety with high cumulative dose (HCD) of PLD. Aim of the \\nwork: We conducted this trial to outline the cardiac \\nsafety of HCD of PLD in patients with \\nMBC who previously received conventional anthracyclines. Methods: During the period of nine years (January 2011 to \\nDecember 2019). We extracted the data of the patients with MBC receiving \\nPLD at Medical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut \\nUniversity. These included patients’ demographics and therapeutic data \\nincluding the full data of PLD, prior conventional anthracyclines, prior \\ntrastuzumab, and prior radiotherapy. Also, data about comorbidities as well as \\ncardiac and other toxicities of PLD were obtained. The data was analysed using \\nSPSS v. 21. Results: For all 81 eligible patients, the mean age was 43.9 \\nyears (±standard deviation (SD) 13.2). The mean cumulative dose of PLD was \\n378.4 mg/m2 (± SD of 250.2) and a range of 100 - 1200 \\nmg/m2. About thirty-one (38.3%) patients received high cumulative dose (400 mg/m2 or more), \\nwhile the remaining 50 patients did not. The decline in left \\nventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was relatively rare; and of low grade. Grade 2 decline in LVEF occurred in only two patients who \\nreceived high cumulative dose of PLD, and only one patient who did not reach \\nHCD (p = 0.555). Grade 3 or 4 decline in LVEF did not occur in patients either with \\nor without HCD. Regarding other toxicities, there was a significant increase in \\nincidence of all grades palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) in patients who received HCD of PLD when compared to those who did not reach the HCD (38.7% versus 16% respectively; p = 0.021). Conclusion: Our study concluded that the use of \\nPLD seems to be a justified agent in the treatment of MBC who previously \\ntreated by conventional anthracyclines in the adjuvant, metastatic or both settings, \\neven in patients reaching the cumulative dose of conventional anthracycline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":67095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"乳腺癌(英文)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"乳腺癌(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/abcr.2020.93005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"乳腺癌(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/abcr.2020.93005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:转移性癌症(MBC)的治疗仍然具有挑战性。许多研究记录了聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素(PLD)对MBC患者的疗效,但关于PLD高累积剂量(HCD)的心脏安全性的数据有限。工作目的:我们进行了这项试验,以概述PLD的HCD在既往接受常规蒽环类药物治疗的MBC患者中的心脏安全性。方法:在九年期间(2011年1月至2019年12月)。我们提取了在阿西乌大学南埃及癌症研究所肿瘤科接受PLD的MBC患者的数据。其中包括患者的人口统计和治疗数据,包括PLD、既往常规蒽环类药物、既往曲妥珠单抗和既往放疗的完整数据。此外,还获得了PLD的合并症以及心脏和其他毒性的数据。使用SPSS v.21对数据进行分析。结果:所有81名符合条件的患者的平均年龄为43.9岁(±标准差(SD)13.2)。PLD的平均累积剂量为378.4 mg/m2(±SD为250.2),范围为100-1200 mg/m2。大约三十一名(38.3%)患者接受了高累积剂量(400 mg/m2或以上),而其余50名患者没有接受。左心室射血分数(LVEF)下降相对罕见;并且等级低。只有两名接受高累积剂量PLD的患者和一名未达到HCD的患者的LVEF出现2级下降(p=0.555)。无论是否患有HCD,LVEF都没有出现3级或4级下降。关于其它毒性,与未达到HCD的患者相比,接受HCD或PLD的患者所有级别的掌跖红感觉障碍(PPE)的发生率显著增加(分别为38.7%和16%;p=0.021)佐剂、转移性或两者兼有,即使在达到常规蒽环类药物累积剂量的患者中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiac Safety with High Cumulative Dose of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Conventional Anthracyclines
Introduction: The treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still challenging. Many studies documented the efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with MBC, but there is a limited data about the cardiac safety with high cumulative dose (HCD) of PLD. Aim of the work: We conducted this trial to outline the cardiac safety of HCD of PLD in patients with MBC who previously received conventional anthracyclines. Methods: During the period of nine years (January 2011 to December 2019). We extracted the data of the patients with MBC receiving PLD at Medical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University. These included patients’ demographics and therapeutic data including the full data of PLD, prior conventional anthracyclines, prior trastuzumab, and prior radiotherapy. Also, data about comorbidities as well as cardiac and other toxicities of PLD were obtained. The data was analysed using SPSS v. 21. Results: For all 81 eligible patients, the mean age was 43.9 years (±standard deviation (SD) 13.2). The mean cumulative dose of PLD was 378.4 mg/m2 (± SD of 250.2) and a range of 100 - 1200 mg/m2. About thirty-one (38.3%) patients received high cumulative dose (400 mg/m2 or more), while the remaining 50 patients did not. The decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was relatively rare; and of low grade. Grade 2 decline in LVEF occurred in only two patients who received high cumulative dose of PLD, and only one patient who did not reach HCD (p = 0.555). Grade 3 or 4 decline in LVEF did not occur in patients either with or without HCD. Regarding other toxicities, there was a significant increase in incidence of all grades palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) in patients who received HCD of PLD when compared to those who did not reach the HCD (38.7% versus 16% respectively; p = 0.021). Conclusion: Our study concluded that the use of PLD seems to be a justified agent in the treatment of MBC who previously treated by conventional anthracyclines in the adjuvant, metastatic or both settings, even in patients reaching the cumulative dose of conventional anthracycline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
Pre-Operative MRI in HER-2 Receptor Positive and Her-2 Receptor Negative Breast Cancer: A Comparison Needs and Opportunities for Information in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Tanzania—A Qualitative Study Problems of Contraception in Commune IV of the District of Bamako about 109 Cases Epidemiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects of Breast Cancer in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the CHU Gabriel Touré from 2020 to 2022 Relation between Neurotransmitters and NK Cells in Adrenal and Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1