研究性疗法和患者自主权

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS Canadian Journal of Bioethics Pub Date : 2020-11-16 DOI:10.7202/1073786ar
Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, T. Kolettis
{"title":"研究性疗法和患者自主权","authors":"Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, T. Kolettis","doi":"10.7202/1073786ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing demand for novel therapies has raised new ethical dilemmas for society. Vigorous debates have been initiated, especially after the recent Right to Try Act in the US, which aims to facilitate access to new agents, even at an early stage of the investigation process. This article explores the concept of patient’s autonomy in accessing investigational treatments, and discusses the implications of autonomy for patients, researchers and regulatory authorities. We propose that, in cases of adequate understanding of the anticipated risks and benefits, society should accept patients’ autonomy in choosing to try new therapies, even in the absence of firm data. However, basic ethical principles should not be compromised, as the medical community and society as a whole retain the right to properly evaluate the accumulated experience from such cases. These thoughts may contribute to the ongoing discussions on ethical policies in clinical research.","PeriodicalId":37334,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigational Therapies and Patients’ Autonomy\",\"authors\":\"Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, T. Kolettis\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1073786ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The growing demand for novel therapies has raised new ethical dilemmas for society. Vigorous debates have been initiated, especially after the recent Right to Try Act in the US, which aims to facilitate access to new agents, even at an early stage of the investigation process. This article explores the concept of patient’s autonomy in accessing investigational treatments, and discusses the implications of autonomy for patients, researchers and regulatory authorities. We propose that, in cases of adequate understanding of the anticipated risks and benefits, society should accept patients’ autonomy in choosing to try new therapies, even in the absence of firm data. However, basic ethical principles should not be compromised, as the medical community and society as a whole retain the right to properly evaluate the accumulated experience from such cases. These thoughts may contribute to the ongoing discussions on ethical policies in clinical research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Bioethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1073786ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1073786ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对新疗法日益增长的需求给社会带来了新的伦理困境。激烈的辩论已经开始,尤其是在美国最近通过了《审判权法案》(Right to Try Act)之后,该法案旨在促进接触新的特工,即使是在调查过程的早期阶段。本文探讨了患者在获得研究性治疗方面的自主概念,并讨论了自主对患者、研究人员和监管机构的影响。我们建议,在充分了解预期风险和收益的情况下,社会应该接受患者在选择尝试新疗法时的自主权,即使在缺乏可靠数据的情况下。然而,基本的伦理原则不应受到损害,因为医学界和整个社会都有权正确评价从这些案例中积累的经验。这些想法可能有助于正在进行的关于临床研究伦理政策的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigational Therapies and Patients’ Autonomy
The growing demand for novel therapies has raised new ethical dilemmas for society. Vigorous debates have been initiated, especially after the recent Right to Try Act in the US, which aims to facilitate access to new agents, even at an early stage of the investigation process. This article explores the concept of patient’s autonomy in accessing investigational treatments, and discusses the implications of autonomy for patients, researchers and regulatory authorities. We propose that, in cases of adequate understanding of the anticipated risks and benefits, society should accept patients’ autonomy in choosing to try new therapies, even in the absence of firm data. However, basic ethical principles should not be compromised, as the medical community and society as a whole retain the right to properly evaluate the accumulated experience from such cases. These thoughts may contribute to the ongoing discussions on ethical policies in clinical research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Canadian Journal of Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Developing a New Clinical Ethics Framework for Rehab: A Pre-Implementation Evaluation from the Perspective of Future Users De la pudeur dans les soins Migrating Metaphors: Why We Should Be Concerned About a ‘War on Mental Illness’ in the Aftermath of COVID-19 Bioéthique globale : une question d’aménagement du paysage social et intellectuel An Ethics-informed, Policy-based Approach to the Management of Challenges Posed by Living-at-Risk, Frequent Users of Emergency Departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1