七国集团(g7)国内生产总值(gdp)系列结构性断裂的有限混合分析

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS Research in Economics Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rie.2023.01.001
Alessandro Cremaschini , Antonello Maruotti
{"title":"七国集团(g7)国内生产总值(gdp)系列结构性断裂的有限混合分析","authors":"Alessandro Cremaschini ,&nbsp;Antonello Maruotti","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2023.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we apply a clustering procedure to detect trend changes in macroeconomic data, focusing on the GDP time series for the G-7 countries. A finite mixture of regression models is considered to show different patterns and changes in GDP slopes over time in the long-trend component. Two popular trend-cycle decompositions (i.e., Beveridge and Nelson Decomposition and Hodrick and Prescott filter) are considered in a preliminary step of the analysis to stress the differences between the two methods in terms of the inferred clustering, if any. This approach can be used also to detect structural breaks or change points and it is an alternative to existing approaches in a probabilistic framework. We also discuss international changes in the GDP distribution for the G-7 countries, highlighting similarities, e.g., in break dates, aiming at adding more insights on the economic integration among countries. Our findings suggest that by looking at changes in slope over time a mixture of regression models is able to detect change points, also compared with alternative procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"77 1","pages":"Pages 76-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A finite mixture analysis of structural breaks in the G-7 gross domestic product series\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Cremaschini ,&nbsp;Antonello Maruotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rie.2023.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper we apply a clustering procedure to detect trend changes in macroeconomic data, focusing on the GDP time series for the G-7 countries. A finite mixture of regression models is considered to show different patterns and changes in GDP slopes over time in the long-trend component. Two popular trend-cycle decompositions (i.e., Beveridge and Nelson Decomposition and Hodrick and Prescott filter) are considered in a preliminary step of the analysis to stress the differences between the two methods in terms of the inferred clustering, if any. This approach can be used also to detect structural breaks or change points and it is an alternative to existing approaches in a probabilistic framework. We also discuss international changes in the GDP distribution for the G-7 countries, highlighting similarities, e.g., in break dates, aiming at adding more insights on the economic integration among countries. Our findings suggest that by looking at changes in slope over time a mixture of regression models is able to detect change points, also compared with alternative procedures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Economics\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 76-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944323000017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944323000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们应用聚类程序来检测宏观经济数据的趋势变化,重点关注七国集团国家的GDP时间序列。一个有限的混合回归模型被认为显示不同的模式和变化的GDP斜率随时间的长期趋势成分。在分析的初步步骤中考虑了两种流行的趋势周期分解(即贝弗里奇和尼尔森分解和Hodrick和Prescott过滤器),以强调两种方法在推断聚类方面的差异,如果有的话。这种方法也可以用于检测结构中断或变化点,它是概率框架中现有方法的替代方法。我们还讨论了七国集团国家国内生产总值分布的国际变化,强调了相似性,例如,在休息日期,旨在增加对国家间经济一体化的更多见解。我们的研究结果表明,通过观察斜率随时间的变化,混合回归模型能够检测到变化点,也可以与其他方法进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A finite mixture analysis of structural breaks in the G-7 gross domestic product series

In this paper we apply a clustering procedure to detect trend changes in macroeconomic data, focusing on the GDP time series for the G-7 countries. A finite mixture of regression models is considered to show different patterns and changes in GDP slopes over time in the long-trend component. Two popular trend-cycle decompositions (i.e., Beveridge and Nelson Decomposition and Hodrick and Prescott filter) are considered in a preliminary step of the analysis to stress the differences between the two methods in terms of the inferred clustering, if any. This approach can be used also to detect structural breaks or change points and it is an alternative to existing approaches in a probabilistic framework. We also discuss international changes in the GDP distribution for the G-7 countries, highlighting similarities, e.g., in break dates, aiming at adding more insights on the economic integration among countries. Our findings suggest that by looking at changes in slope over time a mixture of regression models is able to detect change points, also compared with alternative procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
89 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Bulkiness of goods and the gravity of international trade: Differential impact of trade barriers Oil Price and Long-run Economic Growth in Oil-importing Developing Countries Foreign aid and inequality: Do conflicts matter? The macroeconomic effects of productivity shocks: Predictions of conventional business cycle models are not always incompatible with SSA economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1