《女性主义与出生与重生政治》

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Australian Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-29 DOI:10.1080/08164649.2019.1570817
Maggie Tonkin
{"title":"《女性主义与出生与重生政治》","authors":"Maggie Tonkin","doi":"10.1080/08164649.2019.1570817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT RD Laing’s phenomenological approach to madness influenced early second wave feminism, since it buttressed the feminist critique of the nuclear family and exposed the abuses of institutional psychiatry in policing gender roles. However, feminist perceptions of Laing’s ‘gender blindness’, as exemplified by Elaine Showalter’s The Female Malady: Women, Madness and English Culture, and the feminist turn towards Freudian/Lacanian psychoanalysis, soon moderated enthusiasm for Laing. In the 1970s, Laing became increasingly incensed about the medicalisation of childbirth, writing an unpublished manuscript, The Politics of Birth, and promoting the practice of therapeutic ‘re-birthing’. The latter practice is relentlessly satirised in Emma Tennant’s speculative novel The Crack (1978). Drawing on Laing’s unpublished papers, I show that even as feminists were disavowing, critiquing and satirising Laing, he was embracing feminist ideas. I argue that Laing’s emergent feminist sympathies underpin his critique of contemporaneous birthing practices and that there is a common thread linking his critique of psychiatric and obstetric abuses as being premised on a denial of the value of ‘unscripted’ human experience. This article thus argues for a more nuanced understanding of feminism’s own intellectual history and a reappraisal of Laing vis-a-vis feminism, which would contribute to the broader re-evaluation of Laing’s work currently underway.","PeriodicalId":46443,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"248 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08164649.2019.1570817","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RD Laing, Feminism and the Politics of Birth and Re-birth\",\"authors\":\"Maggie Tonkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08164649.2019.1570817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT RD Laing’s phenomenological approach to madness influenced early second wave feminism, since it buttressed the feminist critique of the nuclear family and exposed the abuses of institutional psychiatry in policing gender roles. However, feminist perceptions of Laing’s ‘gender blindness’, as exemplified by Elaine Showalter’s The Female Malady: Women, Madness and English Culture, and the feminist turn towards Freudian/Lacanian psychoanalysis, soon moderated enthusiasm for Laing. In the 1970s, Laing became increasingly incensed about the medicalisation of childbirth, writing an unpublished manuscript, The Politics of Birth, and promoting the practice of therapeutic ‘re-birthing’. The latter practice is relentlessly satirised in Emma Tennant’s speculative novel The Crack (1978). Drawing on Laing’s unpublished papers, I show that even as feminists were disavowing, critiquing and satirising Laing, he was embracing feminist ideas. I argue that Laing’s emergent feminist sympathies underpin his critique of contemporaneous birthing practices and that there is a common thread linking his critique of psychiatric and obstetric abuses as being premised on a denial of the value of ‘unscripted’ human experience. This article thus argues for a more nuanced understanding of feminism’s own intellectual history and a reappraisal of Laing vis-a-vis feminism, which would contribute to the broader re-evaluation of Laing’s work currently underway.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Feminist Studies\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"248 - 262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08164649.2019.1570817\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Feminist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2019.1570817\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2019.1570817","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要RD Laing对疯狂的现象学方法影响了早期的第二波女权主义,因为它支持了对核心家庭的女权主义批判,并揭露了制度精神病学在监管性别角色方面的弊端。然而,女性主义者对莱恩“性别盲症”的看法,如伊莱恩·肖沃特的《女性病态:女性、疯狂和英国文化》,以及女性主义者转向弗洛伊德/拉康精神分析,很快就缓和了对莱恩的热情。20世纪70年代,莱恩对分娩的医学化越来越愤怒,他写了一份未发表的手稿《出生的政治》,并推广了治疗性的“再生育”实践。艾玛·坦南特(Emma Tennant)的推理小说《裂缝》(The Crack)(1978)对后一种做法进行了无情的讽刺。根据莱恩未发表的论文,我发现,即使女权主义者否认、批评和讽刺莱恩,他也在接受女权主义思想。我认为,莱恩突然出现的女权主义同情支持了他对同时代分娩实践的批评,并且有一条共同的线索将他对精神病和产科虐待的批评联系起来,认为这是以否认“无剧本”人类经验的价值为前提的。因此,本文主张对女权主义自身的思想史有一个更细致的理解,并重新评估莱恩与女权主义的关系,这将有助于对莱恩目前正在进行的工作进行更广泛的重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RD Laing, Feminism and the Politics of Birth and Re-birth
ABSTRACT RD Laing’s phenomenological approach to madness influenced early second wave feminism, since it buttressed the feminist critique of the nuclear family and exposed the abuses of institutional psychiatry in policing gender roles. However, feminist perceptions of Laing’s ‘gender blindness’, as exemplified by Elaine Showalter’s The Female Malady: Women, Madness and English Culture, and the feminist turn towards Freudian/Lacanian psychoanalysis, soon moderated enthusiasm for Laing. In the 1970s, Laing became increasingly incensed about the medicalisation of childbirth, writing an unpublished manuscript, The Politics of Birth, and promoting the practice of therapeutic ‘re-birthing’. The latter practice is relentlessly satirised in Emma Tennant’s speculative novel The Crack (1978). Drawing on Laing’s unpublished papers, I show that even as feminists were disavowing, critiquing and satirising Laing, he was embracing feminist ideas. I argue that Laing’s emergent feminist sympathies underpin his critique of contemporaneous birthing practices and that there is a common thread linking his critique of psychiatric and obstetric abuses as being premised on a denial of the value of ‘unscripted’ human experience. This article thus argues for a more nuanced understanding of feminism’s own intellectual history and a reappraisal of Laing vis-a-vis feminism, which would contribute to the broader re-evaluation of Laing’s work currently underway.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Feminist Studies
Australian Feminist Studies WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Australian Feminist Studies was launched in the summer of 1985 by the Research Centre for Women"s Studies at the University of Adelaide. During the subsequent two decades it has become a leading journal of feminist studies. As an international, peer-reviewed journal, Australian Feminist Studies is proud to sustain a clear political commitment to feminist teaching, research and scholarship. The journal publishes articles of the highest calibre from all around the world, that contribute to current developments and issues across a spectrum of feminisms.
期刊最新文献
Everything is Patchwork! A Conversation about Methodological Experimentation with Patchwork Ethnography. Doing Film Feminisms in the Age of Popular Feminism: A Roundtable Convened by Claire Perkins and Jodi Brooks Radioactive Spacetimes and the Quantum Cosmologies of Kathy Jetn̄il-Kijiner The History and Impact of Women in the Parliament of Western Australia: From Golden Age to Disappointment Sharing the Wealth: Tax, Justice, Gender and Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1