用简单的写作观解释英语二语写作差异

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Reading Psychology Pub Date : 2022-09-24 DOI:10.1080/02702711.2022.2126573
Keith M. Graham, Zohreh R. Eslami
{"title":"用简单的写作观解释英语二语写作差异","authors":"Keith M. Graham, Zohreh R. Eslami","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2022.2126573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines the role of transcription and ideation, the dimensions in the Simple View of Writing, as predictors of narrative and expository writing of English language learners (ELLs). Data were collected from sixth-grade primary school ELL students (N = 56) in Taiwan. Two writing samples, a narrative and an expository, were collected and scored using Curriculum-Based Measures of Writing (CBM-W). In addition, spelling, as a measure of transcription, and oral language, as a measure of ideation, scores were collected. The findings show that both spelling and oral language were found to be independent predictors of L2 writing. Spelling independently accounted for 36% of the variation in both narrative and expository writing, and oral language independently accounted for 24% and 35% of the variation in narrative and expository writing, respectively. When examined together in a regression model, spelling was found to be statistically significant for both narrative and expository writing whereas oral language was not. In light of the findings, the Simple View of Writing may be adequate as a theory for developing L2 writers, but further research is needed on the ideation dimension, both in its conceptualization for L2 writers and its role in the writing process.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":"43 1","pages":"523 - 540"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the Simple View of Writing for Explaining English L2 Writing Variation\",\"authors\":\"Keith M. Graham, Zohreh R. Eslami\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02702711.2022.2126573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study examines the role of transcription and ideation, the dimensions in the Simple View of Writing, as predictors of narrative and expository writing of English language learners (ELLs). Data were collected from sixth-grade primary school ELL students (N = 56) in Taiwan. Two writing samples, a narrative and an expository, were collected and scored using Curriculum-Based Measures of Writing (CBM-W). In addition, spelling, as a measure of transcription, and oral language, as a measure of ideation, scores were collected. The findings show that both spelling and oral language were found to be independent predictors of L2 writing. Spelling independently accounted for 36% of the variation in both narrative and expository writing, and oral language independently accounted for 24% and 35% of the variation in narrative and expository writing, respectively. When examined together in a regression model, spelling was found to be statistically significant for both narrative and expository writing whereas oral language was not. In light of the findings, the Simple View of Writing may be adequate as a theory for developing L2 writers, but further research is needed on the ideation dimension, both in its conceptualization for L2 writers and its role in the writing process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading Psychology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"523 - 540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2126573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2126573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究考察了抄写和构思的作用,即简单写作观中的两个维度,作为英语学习者叙事性和说明性写作的预测因素。本研究以台湾地区六年级小学生为研究对象(N = 56)。收集了两个写作样本,一个是叙事性的,一个是说明性的,并使用基于课程的写作测量(CBM-W)进行评分。此外,还收集了作为抄写标准的拼写和作为思维标准的口头语言的分数。研究结果表明,拼写和口语都是二语写作的独立预测因素。拼写独立占叙事和说明文写作变化的36%,口语独立占叙事和说明文写作变化的24%和35%。当在回归模型中一起检查时,发现拼写在叙事和说明性写作中都具有统计学意义,而口头语言则没有。根据这些发现,简单写作观可能足以作为培养二语作家的理论,但需要进一步研究思维维度,包括其对二语作家的概念化及其在写作过程中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using the Simple View of Writing for Explaining English L2 Writing Variation
Abstract This study examines the role of transcription and ideation, the dimensions in the Simple View of Writing, as predictors of narrative and expository writing of English language learners (ELLs). Data were collected from sixth-grade primary school ELL students (N = 56) in Taiwan. Two writing samples, a narrative and an expository, were collected and scored using Curriculum-Based Measures of Writing (CBM-W). In addition, spelling, as a measure of transcription, and oral language, as a measure of ideation, scores were collected. The findings show that both spelling and oral language were found to be independent predictors of L2 writing. Spelling independently accounted for 36% of the variation in both narrative and expository writing, and oral language independently accounted for 24% and 35% of the variation in narrative and expository writing, respectively. When examined together in a regression model, spelling was found to be statistically significant for both narrative and expository writing whereas oral language was not. In light of the findings, the Simple View of Writing may be adequate as a theory for developing L2 writers, but further research is needed on the ideation dimension, both in its conceptualization for L2 writers and its role in the writing process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
期刊最新文献
Unhinged: Reading Comprehension Tests as Gatekeepers to Teaching The Regularity of High-Frequency Words (Sight Words): Teacher Phonetic Knowledge is Key Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Relations Between Academic Language and Reading Comprehension: The Role of Reading Self-Concept and Reading Enjoyment An Exploration of the Impact of Quality Illustrations in Children’s Picture Books on Preschool Student Narrative Ability Metalinguistic Effects on English Spelling: A Structural Equation Model for Early Literacy Instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1