{"title":"欧盟反垄断法中的非竞争利益:Or Brook对第101条TFEU的实证研究。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2022,548页(120英镑精装本)ISBN: 978-1-108-83760-6","authors":"Emanuela Lecchi","doi":"10.1017/lst.2023.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every so often, a book can jolt us out of the way in which we have been used to thinking about our own discipline. As Or Brook herself recognises, an ‘impressive array of legal scholarship’ has debated the objectives of EU competition policy, the impact of the so-called ‘more economic approach’, and the role of sustainability and other non-market related factors, in the application of competition law generally and Article 101 TFEU specifically. However, starting from a relatively narrow (if ambitious) set of research questions, Brook prompts the reader to consider the very essence of administrative action. Especially after Regulation 1/2003 (the Modernisation Regulation), and the adoption of the so-called ‘more economic approach’ to competition law enforcement, competition enforcers have opted for administrative discretion (to set their priorities, or to open and close cases) over the transparent enforcement of the rules. This has serious consequences for predictability and legal certainty. As the title makes clear, the focus of the investigation is Article 101 TFEU (specifically Article 101 (1) and Article 101(3)). Chapter 1 sets the scene, laying out the research questions, the methodology and the definitions used. The research questions aim to assess the evolution of ‘the rationale, method and limits for balancing competition and non-competition interests in the enforcement of Article 101 TFEU’. Brook takes a narrow approach to the term ‘competition interests’, defined as the ‘core value protected by Article 101 TFEU, namely the promotion of competition process and structure’. This definition is in line with previous academic works, as well as the European Commission (the","PeriodicalId":46121,"journal":{"name":"Legal Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"562 - 566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Competition Interests in EU Antitrust Law: An Empirical Study of Article 101 TFEU by Or Brook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 548 pp (£120 hardback) ISBN: 978-1-108-83760-6\",\"authors\":\"Emanuela Lecchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/lst.2023.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Every so often, a book can jolt us out of the way in which we have been used to thinking about our own discipline. As Or Brook herself recognises, an ‘impressive array of legal scholarship’ has debated the objectives of EU competition policy, the impact of the so-called ‘more economic approach’, and the role of sustainability and other non-market related factors, in the application of competition law generally and Article 101 TFEU specifically. However, starting from a relatively narrow (if ambitious) set of research questions, Brook prompts the reader to consider the very essence of administrative action. Especially after Regulation 1/2003 (the Modernisation Regulation), and the adoption of the so-called ‘more economic approach’ to competition law enforcement, competition enforcers have opted for administrative discretion (to set their priorities, or to open and close cases) over the transparent enforcement of the rules. This has serious consequences for predictability and legal certainty. As the title makes clear, the focus of the investigation is Article 101 TFEU (specifically Article 101 (1) and Article 101(3)). Chapter 1 sets the scene, laying out the research questions, the methodology and the definitions used. The research questions aim to assess the evolution of ‘the rationale, method and limits for balancing competition and non-competition interests in the enforcement of Article 101 TFEU’. Brook takes a narrow approach to the term ‘competition interests’, defined as the ‘core value protected by Article 101 TFEU, namely the promotion of competition process and structure’. This definition is in line with previous academic works, as well as the European Commission (the\",\"PeriodicalId\":46121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"562 - 566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2023.16\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2023.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
每隔一段时间,一本书就能把我们从思考自己学科的习惯中惊醒。正如Or Brook自己所认识到的那样,“一系列令人印象深刻的法律学者”已经就欧盟竞争政策的目标、所谓“更经济的方法”的影响、可持续性和其他非市场相关因素的作用进行了辩论,这些都是在竞争法的一般应用中,特别是在第101条TFEU中。然而,布鲁克从一组相对狭窄(如果雄心勃勃)的研究问题开始,促使读者考虑行政行为的本质。特别是在第1/2003号条例(现代化条例)之后,以及对竞争执法采取所谓的“更经济的方法”,竞争执法者选择了行政自由裁量权(设定优先事项,或开放和关闭案件),而不是透明地执行规则。这对可预测性和法律确定性产生了严重后果。正如标题所示,调查的重点是第101条TFEU(特别是第101(1)条和第101(3)条)。第一章是背景介绍,阐述了研究问题、方法和使用的定义。研究问题旨在评估“在执行第101条TFEU时平衡竞争和非竞争利益的理由、方法和限制”的演变。布鲁克对“竞争利益”一词的定义较为狭隘,他将其定义为“TFEU第101条所保护的核心价值,即促进竞争过程和结构”。这一定义与以前的学术著作以及欧盟委员会(the European Commission)一致
Non-Competition Interests in EU Antitrust Law: An Empirical Study of Article 101 TFEU by Or Brook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 548 pp (£120 hardback) ISBN: 978-1-108-83760-6
Every so often, a book can jolt us out of the way in which we have been used to thinking about our own discipline. As Or Brook herself recognises, an ‘impressive array of legal scholarship’ has debated the objectives of EU competition policy, the impact of the so-called ‘more economic approach’, and the role of sustainability and other non-market related factors, in the application of competition law generally and Article 101 TFEU specifically. However, starting from a relatively narrow (if ambitious) set of research questions, Brook prompts the reader to consider the very essence of administrative action. Especially after Regulation 1/2003 (the Modernisation Regulation), and the adoption of the so-called ‘more economic approach’ to competition law enforcement, competition enforcers have opted for administrative discretion (to set their priorities, or to open and close cases) over the transparent enforcement of the rules. This has serious consequences for predictability and legal certainty. As the title makes clear, the focus of the investigation is Article 101 TFEU (specifically Article 101 (1) and Article 101(3)). Chapter 1 sets the scene, laying out the research questions, the methodology and the definitions used. The research questions aim to assess the evolution of ‘the rationale, method and limits for balancing competition and non-competition interests in the enforcement of Article 101 TFEU’. Brook takes a narrow approach to the term ‘competition interests’, defined as the ‘core value protected by Article 101 TFEU, namely the promotion of competition process and structure’. This definition is in line with previous academic works, as well as the European Commission (the