城市调查的红线图是如何制作的:更深入地了解居屋的按揭人复原部

IF 0.5 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING Journal of Planning History Pub Date : 2021-05-07 DOI:10.1177/15385132211013361
Todd M. Michney
{"title":"城市调查的红线图是如何制作的:更深入地了解居屋的按揭人复原部","authors":"Todd M. Michney","doi":"10.1177/15385132211013361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The infamous “security maps” made in the 1930s by the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), rating supposed mortgage lending risk in urban neighborhoods across the United States, have long been considered the quintessential expression of racist redlining policy. However, a number of misunderstandings and unwarranted speculations about how these maps were made and used have proliferated. Using previously unexamined correspondence, this article establishes that HOLC could not have used the maps for loan denials, did share them with the Federal Housing Administration but not with private industry, and highly improvised their production with numerous methodological inconsistencies, including with regard to race.","PeriodicalId":44738,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Planning History","volume":"21 1","pages":"316 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15385132211013361","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the City Survey’s Redlining Maps Were Made: A Closer Look at HOLC’s Mortgagee Rehabilitation Division\",\"authors\":\"Todd M. Michney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15385132211013361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The infamous “security maps” made in the 1930s by the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), rating supposed mortgage lending risk in urban neighborhoods across the United States, have long been considered the quintessential expression of racist redlining policy. However, a number of misunderstandings and unwarranted speculations about how these maps were made and used have proliferated. Using previously unexamined correspondence, this article establishes that HOLC could not have used the maps for loan denials, did share them with the Federal Housing Administration but not with private industry, and highly improvised their production with numerous methodological inconsistencies, including with regard to race.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Planning History\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"316 - 344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15385132211013361\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Planning History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385132211013361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Planning History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385132211013361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

房主贷款公司(HOLC)在20世纪30年代制作了臭名昭著的“安全地图”,对美国城市社区的抵押贷款风险进行评级,长期以来一直被认为是种族主义红线政策的典型表现。然而,关于这些地图是如何制作和使用的许多误解和毫无根据的猜测已经激增。通过使用先前未经审查的通信,本文确定,HOLC不可能将这些地图用于拒绝贷款,确实与联邦住房管理局(Federal Housing Administration)共享了这些地图,但没有与私营企业共享,并且在制作过程中存在许多方法上的不一致,包括种族方面的不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How the City Survey’s Redlining Maps Were Made: A Closer Look at HOLC’s Mortgagee Rehabilitation Division
The infamous “security maps” made in the 1930s by the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), rating supposed mortgage lending risk in urban neighborhoods across the United States, have long been considered the quintessential expression of racist redlining policy. However, a number of misunderstandings and unwarranted speculations about how these maps were made and used have proliferated. Using previously unexamined correspondence, this article establishes that HOLC could not have used the maps for loan denials, did share them with the Federal Housing Administration but not with private industry, and highly improvised their production with numerous methodological inconsistencies, including with regard to race.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Planning History
Journal of Planning History REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Planning History publishes peer-reviewed articles, book, conference and exhibition reviews, commissioned essays, and updates on new publications on the history of city and regional planning, with particular emphasis on the Americas. JPH invites scholars and practitioners of planning to submit articles and features on the full range of topics embraced by city and regional planning history, including planning history in the Americas, transnational planning experiences, planning history pedagogy, planning history in planning practice, the intellectual roots of the planning processes, and planning history historiography.
期刊最新文献
Building a Social Contract: Modern Workers’ Houses in Early Twentieth-Century Detroit Paul Davidoff’s Life in Prospect: Building a Progressive Planning Research Agenda Through Engaged Scholarship Exposing Freeway Inequalities in the Suburbs: The Cases of Pasadena and Pacoima What Happened to Rural Community and Regional Development? The Evolution of a Planning Idea “‘A Period Favorable to Economic Imperialists’: Railroads and the Hidden History of Slum Clearance in Cleveland, 1910–1930”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1