书评:《重塑政治:数字媒体如何塑造民主》,作者:Andreas Jungherr, Gonzalo Rivero和Daniel gyo - avello

IF 4.1 1区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION International Journal of Press-Politics Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI:10.1177/19401612221073994
R. Lawrence
{"title":"书评:《重塑政治:数字媒体如何塑造民主》,作者:Andreas Jungherr, Gonzalo Rivero和Daniel gyo - avello","authors":"R. Lawrence","doi":"10.1177/19401612221073994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this book is surprisingly simple: To adjust our perspective on the impacts of digital media on politics toward a more moderate and conventional view. Jungherr, Rivero and Gayo-Avello offer a model of digital politics that steers a middle course between the poles of “nothing has changed” and “everything has changed.” Their premise is that political actors’ underlying needs have not shifted with the advent of digital media—only their means of meeting those needs. Politicians still need, as they always have, to enter public discourse and reach people with their messages, to persuade and to mobilize, and to leverage the coordinating power of organizations. Digital media simply offer new and often more efficient ways of achieving some of those ends. But digital media have not fundamentally transformed the underlying motivations of politics nor permanently transformed institutional power relations. The book thus seeks to “transcend the false dichotomy between transformation and stasis” (p. 6). In place of that dichotomy, Retooling Politics argues that the actual influence of digital media on politics should be measured by “the degree to which digital media structure communicative environments in politics and allow actors and organizations to systematically improve their relative position” (p. 9). One real effect is the way that digital media have disrupted the business model, normative standards, and gatekeeping power of legacy media; another is the fundamental structure of many-to-many rather than one-to-many information flows enabled by the Internet. In contrast, they argue, digital media have not radically disrupted campaign communication—in contrast to popular notions about Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns—nor radically improved the efficacy of protest politics, as many initially believed in the wake of the Arab Spring. In campaign politics, they argue, rather than transformation we see adaptation to new tools. In protest politics, we see the persistence of age-old challenges: While digital media make far-flung coordination easier, they do not solve for fundamental power imbalances between institutionalized insiders and insurgent outsiders. A strength of Retooling Politics is how well and explicitly it combines theoretical perspectives and findings from across the fields of communication and political Book Review","PeriodicalId":47605,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Press-Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy by Andreas Jungherr, Gonzalo Rivero and Daniel Gayo-Avello\",\"authors\":\"R. Lawrence\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19401612221073994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this book is surprisingly simple: To adjust our perspective on the impacts of digital media on politics toward a more moderate and conventional view. Jungherr, Rivero and Gayo-Avello offer a model of digital politics that steers a middle course between the poles of “nothing has changed” and “everything has changed.” Their premise is that political actors’ underlying needs have not shifted with the advent of digital media—only their means of meeting those needs. Politicians still need, as they always have, to enter public discourse and reach people with their messages, to persuade and to mobilize, and to leverage the coordinating power of organizations. Digital media simply offer new and often more efficient ways of achieving some of those ends. But digital media have not fundamentally transformed the underlying motivations of politics nor permanently transformed institutional power relations. The book thus seeks to “transcend the false dichotomy between transformation and stasis” (p. 6). In place of that dichotomy, Retooling Politics argues that the actual influence of digital media on politics should be measured by “the degree to which digital media structure communicative environments in politics and allow actors and organizations to systematically improve their relative position” (p. 9). One real effect is the way that digital media have disrupted the business model, normative standards, and gatekeeping power of legacy media; another is the fundamental structure of many-to-many rather than one-to-many information flows enabled by the Internet. In contrast, they argue, digital media have not radically disrupted campaign communication—in contrast to popular notions about Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns—nor radically improved the efficacy of protest politics, as many initially believed in the wake of the Arab Spring. In campaign politics, they argue, rather than transformation we see adaptation to new tools. In protest politics, we see the persistence of age-old challenges: While digital media make far-flung coordination easier, they do not solve for fundamental power imbalances between institutionalized insiders and insurgent outsiders. A strength of Retooling Politics is how well and explicitly it combines theoretical perspectives and findings from across the fields of communication and political Book Review\",\"PeriodicalId\":47605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Press-Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Press-Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221073994\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Press-Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221073994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书的目的非常简单:将我们对数字媒体对政治影响的看法调整为更温和、更传统的观点。Jungher、Rivero和Gayo Avello提供了一种数字政治模式,在“什么都没有改变”和“一切都改变了”之间找到了一条中间路线。他们的前提是,政治行为者的基本需求并没有随着数字媒体的出现而改变,只是他们满足这些需求的手段。政客们仍然需要像往常一样,进入公共话语,用他们的信息接触人们,说服和动员,并利用组织的协调力量。数字媒体只是提供了新的、通常更有效的方式来实现其中的一些目的。但数字媒体并没有从根本上改变政治的根本动机,也没有永久性地改变制度权力关系。因此,这本书试图“超越转型和停滞之间的错误二分法”(第6页)。取代这种二分法,Retooling Politics认为,数字媒体对政治的实际影响应该通过“数字媒体在多大程度上构建政治中的沟通环境,并允许行为者和组织系统地提高其相对地位”来衡量(第9页)。一个真正的影响是数字媒体破坏了传统媒体的商业模式、规范标准和把关能力;另一个是由互联网实现的多对多而不是一对多信息流的基本结构。他们认为,相比之下,数字媒体并没有从根本上扰乱竞选沟通——与人们对巴拉克·奥巴马总统竞选的普遍看法形成鲜明对比——也没有像许多人在阿拉伯之春后最初认为的那样,从根本上提高抗议政治的效力。他们认为,在竞选政治中,我们看到的不是转型,而是对新工具的适应。在抗议政治中,我们看到了长期存在的挑战:虽然数字媒体使广泛的协调变得更容易,但它们并不能解决制度化的内部人和反叛的外部人之间的根本权力失衡。《政治反思》的一个优势是它很好地、明确地结合了传播和政治书评领域的理论观点和发现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy by Andreas Jungherr, Gonzalo Rivero and Daniel Gayo-Avello
The aim of this book is surprisingly simple: To adjust our perspective on the impacts of digital media on politics toward a more moderate and conventional view. Jungherr, Rivero and Gayo-Avello offer a model of digital politics that steers a middle course between the poles of “nothing has changed” and “everything has changed.” Their premise is that political actors’ underlying needs have not shifted with the advent of digital media—only their means of meeting those needs. Politicians still need, as they always have, to enter public discourse and reach people with their messages, to persuade and to mobilize, and to leverage the coordinating power of organizations. Digital media simply offer new and often more efficient ways of achieving some of those ends. But digital media have not fundamentally transformed the underlying motivations of politics nor permanently transformed institutional power relations. The book thus seeks to “transcend the false dichotomy between transformation and stasis” (p. 6). In place of that dichotomy, Retooling Politics argues that the actual influence of digital media on politics should be measured by “the degree to which digital media structure communicative environments in politics and allow actors and organizations to systematically improve their relative position” (p. 9). One real effect is the way that digital media have disrupted the business model, normative standards, and gatekeeping power of legacy media; another is the fundamental structure of many-to-many rather than one-to-many information flows enabled by the Internet. In contrast, they argue, digital media have not radically disrupted campaign communication—in contrast to popular notions about Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns—nor radically improved the efficacy of protest politics, as many initially believed in the wake of the Arab Spring. In campaign politics, they argue, rather than transformation we see adaptation to new tools. In protest politics, we see the persistence of age-old challenges: While digital media make far-flung coordination easier, they do not solve for fundamental power imbalances between institutionalized insiders and insurgent outsiders. A strength of Retooling Politics is how well and explicitly it combines theoretical perspectives and findings from across the fields of communication and political Book Review
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Press/Politics is an interdisciplinary journal for the analysis and discussion of the role of the press and politics in a globalized world. The Journal is interested in theoretical and empirical research on the linkages between the news media and political processes and actors. Special attention is given to the following subjects: the press and political institutions (e.g. the state, government, political parties, social movements, unions, interest groups, business), the politics of media coverage of social and cultural issues (e.g. race, language, health, environment, gender, nationhood, migration, labor), the dynamics and effects of political communication.
期刊最新文献
Rejoinder to the Review of Inside the Local Campaign: Constituency Elections in Canada Interpreters as Spin Doctors: The Interactional Role of Interpreters in China’s Political Press Conferences Do News Frames Really Have Some Influence in the Real World? A Computational Analysis of Cumulative Framing Effects on Emotions and Opinions About Immigration Political Viewpoint Diversity in the News: Market and Ownership Conditions for a Pluralistic Media System “Everything is Biased”: Populist Supporters’ Folk Theories of Journalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1